New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Kamala Harris engaged in insurrection in 2020 (BLM riots) and must be removed.

The 3rd paragraph of the 14A says anyone who has engaged in insurrection against the govt cannot be a govt official.

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability"

In 2020 Kammy called for more rioting. Even super-liberal snopes says she said it.


""""In a June 2020 interview, U.S. Democratic vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris said of the nationwide anti-police brutality protests: “Everyone beware. They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they're not gonna stop after election day ... They’re not gonna let up, and they should not.”""""

The left wants trump banned from running for office merely because on jan 6 2021 he encouraged his people to ''fight like hell". They call that insurrection!!! The case against kammy for insurrection is far stronger.
 
Protests are not insurrection or rebellion. Trump encouraged people to join his supporters whom he knew had come armed and with a terrorist plan of action. Harris encouraged peaceful protests so people would blow off steam and not riot.

J6 was a peaceful protest. The BLM riots were not. They were full blown riots with shootings and widespread arson and caused billions of dollars of damage.
 
J6 was a peaceful protest. The BLM riots were not. They were full blown riots with shootings and widespread arson and caused billions of dollars of damage.
The January 6 attacks had 15,000 times as much property damage per participant per hour and about 350,000 times as many killed per participant per hour. Anyone who engaged in shooting and arson was blatantly ignoring BLM leadership’s instructions while the most violent on January 6 took their cues directly from the Trump campaign. A peaceful protest against the peaceful transfer of power to the election winner is a contradiction in terms.
 
Protests are not insurrection or rebellion. Trump encouraged people to join his supporters whom he knew had come armed and with a terrorist plan of action. Harris encouraged peaceful protests so people would blow off steam and not riot.

"peaceful" like burning down black neighborhoods or destroying downtown stores and taxpayers cop cars!
 
The January 6 attacks had 15,000 times as much property damage per participant per hour and about 350,000 times as many killed per participant per hour. Anyone who engaged in shooting and arson was blatantly ignoring BLM leadership’s instructions while the most violent on January 6 took their cues directly from the Trump campaign. A peaceful protest against the peaceful transfer of power to the election winner is a contradiction in terms.

Link to the 15,000 times claim________________go
 
"peaceful" like burning down black neighborhoods or destroying downtown stores and taxpayers cop cars!
There were peaceful protests during the day. Rioters showed up after dark. Different people.
They were not encouraged by any elected people or dem leaders.
 
The issue is not saying an election is stolen. It is taking up arms to stop the constitutionally recognized winner from taking office.

No, the issue at hand per the top post is Kamala Harris cheer leading for violent mobs and later using her position to beg for money to bail out those who were arrested. It's called abetting.

i.e encourage or assist (someone) to do something wrong, in particular, to commit a crime or other offense:

And it had nothing whatsoever to do with the January 6 riot.
 
Last edited:
No, the issue at hand per the top post is Kamala Harris cheer leading for violent mobs and later using her position to beg for money to bail out those who were arrested. It's called abetting.

i.e encourage or assist (someone) to do something wrong, in particular, to commit a crime or other offense:

And it had nothing whatsoever to do with the January 6 riot.
It also didn’t happen. You can pretend all the BLM protesters were “violent mobs” but the world knows you’re lying.
 
No, the issue at hand per the top post is Kamala Harris cheer leading for violent mobs and later using her position to beg for money to bail out those who were arrested. It's called abetting.

i.e encourage or assist (someone) to do something wrong, in particular, to commit a crime or other offense:

And it had nothing whatsoever to do with the January 6 riot.
1. She spoke about protests...not the rioters.
2. So judges set bail. Your complaint is with them if they set bail for anyone charged with arson or violence.
 
Back
Top