New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

10% For The Big Guy Update #2

Zam-Zam

Zam-Zam

Senator
There has been a development:

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss a special counsel in the Hunter Biden probe, as well as any other matters that arose or may arise from that investigation.

"I'm here today to announce the appointment of David Weiss as a special counsel consistent with the Department of Justice regulations governing such matters. In keeping with those regulations, I have today notified the designated members of each House of Congress of the appointment," Garland said at a press conference in Washington, D.C.

Weiss is the federal prosecutor who has investigated the business dealings of Hunter Biden and brought charges against him in Delaware. His appointment as special counsel indicates that, contrary to Hunter's defense lawyers' claims, the Justice Department investigation into President Biden's son is not over.

Garland said Tuesday that Weiss told him that "in his judgment, his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work as a special counsel, and he asked to be appointed."


Complete text: AG Garland appoints Hunter Biden investigator David Weiss special counsel | Fox News


That last sentence caught my eye.

What it all means, only time will tell.


It's all good.
 
Zam-Zam said:
There has been a development:

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss a special counsel in the Hunter Biden probe, as well as any other matters that arose or may arise from that investigation.

"I'm here today to announce the appointment of David Weiss as a special counsel consistent with the Department of Justice regulations governing such matters. In keeping with those regulations, I have today notified the designated members of each House of Congress of the appointment," Garland said at a press conference in Washington, D.C.

Weiss is the federal prosecutor who has investigated the business dealings of Hunter Biden and brought charges against him in Delaware. His appointment as special counsel indicates that, contrary to Hunter's defense lawyers' claims, the Justice Department investigation into President Biden's son is not over.

Garland said Tuesday that Weiss told him that "in his judgment, his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work as a special counsel, and he asked to be appointed."


Complete text: AG Garland appoints Hunter Biden investigator David Weiss special counsel | Fox News


That last sentence caught my eye.

What it all means, only time will tell.


It's all good.
Click to expand...

It could really work to Hunters advantage in the long run. Not being in the clear yet will make him less likely to revert back to drug use which is the real issue regarding all these investigations. By the time these prosecutors decide to charge him the statutes could run out. My prediction is that before Hunter goes to trial, if ever, Trump will have lost the election badly, taking out the GOP Congress with him and be out on bail under home arrest awaiting sentencing for dozens of felony charges. Things look pretty good from where I sit. As far as 10% for the big guy, so far that sure hasn’t gone anywhere except in the imaginations of Comer, Grassley, Jordan and Johnson and the Trump faithful.
 
Zam-Zam said:
There has been a development:

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss a special counsel in the Hunter Biden probe, as well as any other matters that arose or may arise from that investigation.

"I'm here today to announce the appointment of David Weiss as a special counsel consistent with the Department of Justice regulations governing such matters. In keeping with those regulations, I have today notified the designated members of each House of Congress of the appointment," Garland said at a press conference in Washington, D.C.

Weiss is the federal prosecutor who has investigated the business dealings of Hunter Biden and brought charges against him in Delaware. His appointment as special counsel indicates that, contrary to Hunter's defense lawyers' claims, the Justice Department investigation into President Biden's son is not over.

Garland said Tuesday that Weiss told him that "in his judgment, his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work as a special counsel, and he asked to be appointed."


Complete text: AG Garland appoints Hunter Biden investigator David Weiss special counsel | Fox News


That last sentence caught my eye.

What it all means, only time will tell.


It's all good.
Click to expand...
This is simple transparent tactic to apply veil of “I can’t comment or discuss because this is under active investigation”. Now, the GOP House doofuses are effectively stymied in their Hunter-Joe-Influence Peddling-mania. Very simple political checkmate.

We get the pols we deserve…and we’ve been doing a LOT of deserving lately. :-(
 
RickWA said:
This is simple transparent tactic to apply veil of “I can’t comment or discuss because this is under active investigation”. Now, the GOP House doofuses are effectively stymied in their Hunter-Joe-Influence Peddling-mania. Very simple political checkmate.

We get the pols we deserve…and we’ve been doing a LOT of deserving lately. :-(
Click to expand...

What would really be a hoot is if the Biden’s get sick of this shit and decide to pack it in and the Dems run a younger, smarter, more effective candidate with less baggage. Like the proverbial idiot car chasing dog, they will then be left bleeding on the side of the road. The whole congress would be left with their dicks in their hands and a fat old ass hole with a whole freight car full of bad baggage. That’s the direction I see this heading. Best case for GOP is if Trump craps out and they get to run another candidate.
 
Jack4freedom said:
What would really be a hoot is if the Biden’s get sick of this shit and decide to pack it in and the Dems run a younger, smarter, more effective candidate with less baggage. Like the proverbial idiot car chasing dog, they will then be left bleeding on the side of the road. The whole congress would be left with their dicks in their hands and a fat old ass hole with a whole freight car full of bad baggage. That’s the direction I see this heading. Best case for GOP is if Trump craps out and they get to run another candidate.
Click to expand...
Yep. I honestly do not care. There is no high ground between Trump and Biden, GOP and DNC. I know you and I don’t agree on this - and that’s ok.
My view is that there is NOTHING to salvage of Republican and Democrat inventories. Their respective adherents are simple ideologues.

That’s life. That’s where we stand.
 
RickWA said:
Yep. I honestly do not care. There is no high ground between Trump and Biden, GOP and DNC. I know you and I don’t agree on this - and that’s ok.
My view is that there is NOTHING to salvage of Republican and Democrat inventories. Their respective adherents are simple ideologues.

That’s life. That’s where we stand.
Click to expand...

It would be nice to have two or three younger, more intelligent candidates running next year. If that were the case, I could see myself voting for a Republican, an Independent or a Democrat depending who they are and what they stand for.
 
Zam-Zam said:
There has been a development:

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss a special counsel in the Hunter Biden probe, as well as any other matters that arose or may arise from that investigation.

"I'm here today to announce the appointment of David Weiss as a special counsel consistent with the Department of Justice regulations governing such matters. In keeping with those regulations, I have today notified the designated members of each House of Congress of the appointment," Garland said at a press conference in Washington, D.C.

Weiss is the federal prosecutor who has investigated the business dealings of Hunter Biden and brought charges against him in Delaware. His appointment as special counsel indicates that, contrary to Hunter's defense lawyers' claims, the Justice Department investigation into President Biden's son is not over.

Garland said Tuesday that Weiss told him that "in his judgment, his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work as a special counsel, and he asked to be appointed."


Complete text: AG Garland appoints Hunter Biden investigator David Weiss special counsel | Fox News


That last sentence caught my eye.

What it all means, only time will tell.


It's all good.
Click to expand...
good post. Weiss "ASKED to be appointed"? . . . . WTH. Alarm bells should go off right there.
 
Zam-Zam said:
There has been a development:

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss a special counsel in the Hunter Biden probe, as well as any other matters that arose or may arise from that investigation.

"I'm here today to announce the appointment of David Weiss as a special counsel consistent with the Department of Justice regulations governing such matters. In keeping with those regulations, I have today notified the designated members of each House of Congress of the appointment," Garland said at a press conference in Washington, D.C.

Weiss is the federal prosecutor who has investigated the business dealings of Hunter Biden and brought charges against him in Delaware. His appointment as special counsel indicates that, contrary to Hunter's defense lawyers' claims, the Justice Department investigation into President Biden's son is not over.

Garland said Tuesday that Weiss told him that "in his judgment, his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work as a special counsel, and he asked to be appointed."


Complete text: AG Garland appoints Hunter Biden investigator David Weiss special counsel | Fox News


That last sentence caught my eye.

What it all means, only time will tell.


It's all good.
Click to expand...
The email suggesting 10% for "the big guy" was from 2017. What job did Joe have at the time that would have made that suggestion an indication of corruption?

Bobulinski, in an October 2020 interview with Tucker Carlson, was referencing a May 13, 2017, email he received from James Gilliar, a former British special forces officer who also was a partner in the deal.

Writer of '10%' email confirms 'big guy' is Joe Biden (wnd.com)

The very next day the articles of incorporation were filed and Joe is not listed as a stock holder...
 
Last edited:
RickWA said:
This is simple transparent tactic to apply veil of “I can’t comment or discuss because this is under active investigation”. Now, the GOP House doofuses are effectively stymied in their Hunter-Joe-Influence Peddling-mania. Very simple political checkmate.

We get the pols we deserve…and we’ve been doing a LOT of deserving lately. :-(
Click to expand...

Could be. I expect a dog-and-pony show that Washington excels at.

A real investigation? Not in the best interests of the Party Bosses, so, that seems unlikely.

Still, no President likes the words "Special Counsel" affiliated with their administration. That makes any scandal official.
 
middleview said:
The email suggesting 10% for "the big guy" was from 2017. What job did Joe have at the time that would have made that suggestion an indication of corruption?

Bobulinski, in an October 2020 interview with Tucker Carlson, was referencing a May 13, 2017, email he received from James Gilliar, a former British special forces officer who also was a partner in the deal.

Writer of '10%' email confirms 'big guy' is Joe Biden (wnd.com)

The very next day the articles of incorporation were filed and Joe is not listed as a stock holder...
Click to expand...

This thread is about Merrick Garland's decision to appoint a special counsel. I refer you to the top post for clarification.
 
middleview said:
The thread is titled "10% for the Big Guy"? Did you forget?
Click to expand...

No. That phrase does appear on that dreaded Hunter Biden laptop. You are free to make of it whatever you will...Whatever you choose to make of it, however, is your business. The same holds true for everyone.]

Thank you for continually bumping that top post, however.

It's all good.
 
Zam-Zam said:
No. That phrase does appear on that dreaded Hunter Biden laptop. You are free to make of it whatever you will...Whatever you choose to make of it, however, is your business. The same holds true for everyone.]

Thank you for continually bumping that top post, however.

It's all good.
Click to expand...
That made it part of the topic of the thread. If you didn't want that to be discussed, think more carefully about the title of your threads.
 
middleview said:
That made it part of the topic of the thread. If you didn't want that to be discussed, think more carefully about the title of your threads.
Click to expand...

I find it entirely appropriate. It hints at the possibility of a corrupt bargain, which open-minded people must acknowledge is a distinct possibility.

The more you refer to it, the more I find myself becoming increasingly satisfied with it. You'll likely be seeing more of it.

Again, thank you.
 
Zam-Zam said:
I find it entirely appropriate. It hints at the possibility of a corrupt bargain, which open-minded people must acknowledge is a distinct possibility.

The more you refer to it, the more I find myself becoming increasingly satisfied with it. You'll likely be seeing more of it.

Again, thank you.
Click to expand...

Really? "Hints at the possibility of a corrupt bargain"?

Please explain. Joe Biden was not in office at the time of that email or of the incorporation that the email suggested he be part of. The fact is that the articles of incorporation were filed the next day and Joe was not listed as a stock holder.
 
middleview said:
Really? "Hints at the possibility of a corrupt bargain"?

Please explain. Joe Biden was not in office at the time of that email or of the incorporation that the email suggested he be part of. The fact is that the articles of incorporation were filed the next day and Joe was not listed as a stock holder.
Click to expand...

Yes, really.

Why does it bother you so?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top