New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

A repost of 2000 Mules

Halo

Mayor
Use your own brains. Watch around the 23 min mark the talk over geolocation criteria used to determine at least 224 mules in the Atlanta area. Nothing @middleview says really debunks what is said when taken at face value.

 
Last edited:
With cellular triangulation the protagonists were able to get a murder solved. It is criteria that isolates the ballot stuffing.
 
Screen cap for you @middleview

Apparently this is in response to a request for video surveillance of Fulton Co. (Atlanta). Is this a lie too? Steve Rosenberg might have a lawsuit given how lawsuit happy Dems are. ha ha

1732915039715.png
 
User your own brains. Watch around the 23 min mark the talk over geolocation criteria used to determine at least 224 mules in the Atlanta area. Nothing @middleview says really debunks what is said when taken at face value.

That garbage was debunked six ways to Sunday. Even the creators backed away for their own BS.
 
As I watch this again @middleview you don't address a fraction of what is alleged by the protagonists. People just have to watch it on their own and take your critique and decide for themselves.
 
According to protagonists in 2000 Mules Wisconsin did not have surveillance video on drop boxes. Are they lying @middleview ?
Already, Engelbrecht has filed a public records request with the Dane County Clerk’s Office for “copies of video recordings from security cameras used to surveil all exterior and interior ballot drop boxes in Dane County for the November 2024 Election.” The county, whose seat is Madison, does not have access to camera footage, which is kept by municipalities, the county clerk told ProPublica.

Battle Over Ballot Drop Boxes Rages On in Wisconsin — ProPublica


Washington County Board approves funding of video surveillance of election drop boxes
The Washington County Board of Supervisors Oct. 9 unanimously approved to transfer $3,000 from the budget's general fund to the clerk's budget to provide security surveillance for its absentee ballot drop boxes. Each municipality in the county can decide if it wants to use these funds. County Clerk Ashley Reichart said that if a municipality already has video surveillance, it can get reimbursed for some of its costs.
Washington County approves funds for video surveillance of drop boxes
 
With cellular triangulation the protagonists were able to get a murder solved. It is criteria that isolates the ballot stuffing.
In an isolated area they showed the accused following the dead man as he collected money from several locations, including the spot where he was killed....if you are talking about the two sex offenders wearing gps monitors.
 
Screen cap for you @middleview

Apparently this is in response to a request for video surveillance of Fulton Co. (Atlanta). Is this a lie too? Steve Rosenberg might have a lawsuit given how lawsuit happy Dems are. ha ha

View attachment 80324
This out of context screen grab does not show video surveillance doesn't exist, since it doesn't even mention video....got a link to where you got this?

Drop boxes became a political target
Forty-three states used drop boxes during the 2020 election. But in the months following, ballot drop boxes became a stand-in for more sweeping debates around voting rights and election integrity in Georgia and around the country, though they were used by voters of all political parties and in many states like Georgia they were under round-the-clock surveillance. They became a target of conspiracy theories about widespread election fraud promoted by Trump and his allies.

Voting drop box restrictions in certain Georgia counties make it harder to vote : NPR
 
User your own brains. Watch around the 23 min mark the talk over geolocation criteria used to determine at least 224 mules in the Atlanta area. Nothing @middleview says really debunks what is said when taken at face value.

Evidence Gaps in ‘2000 Mules’
Gregg Phillips of True the Vote says that in Atlanta, the group identified 242 “mules” who went to an average of 24 drop boxes and made an average of eight stops at one of the nonprofits during a two-week period. The group says it proves “coordinated, systematic fraud in all key states where the election was decided” and that the number of alleged illegal votes was enough to swing the 2020 presidential election in Biden’s favor.

But generally, he said, GPS data from apps on cellphones are only accurate to around 40 feet. Research published by the University of Georgia in 2019 concluded that iPhone GPS was only accurate in a range of 7 to 13 meters (23 to 43 feet).

“That’s not accurate enough to tell if someone stopped at a ballot box, or if someone simply walked near the box,” Quintin said. “If it is a high-traffic area, I can think of any number of legitimate reasons why someone would be in the vicinity of a ballot box.”


Update, Feb. 16, 2024: In July 2023, the State Election Board in Georgia sued True the Vote and eventually got a court order in November compelling the group to provide its evidence of a massive ballot-stuffing scheme, including the identity and contact information of people TTV claimed had knowledge of such a scheme.

In a December response first reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Feb. 14, True the Vote failed to provide any information on those individuals. The group’s lawyers for True the Vote stated, “TTV does not have in its possession, custody, or control such identity and contact information.” Neither was True the Vote able to produce confidentiality agreements it had “previously said existed,” the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported.

“True the Vote made wild and false allegations as a fundraising grift that undermined public confidence in the integrity of Georgia’s elections,” Mike Hassinger, a spokesman for the Georgia secretary of state, told us via email. “Now that they’ve admitted to their con in court, they owe the voters of Georgia an apology.”

Evidence Gaps in '2000 Mules' - FactCheck.org
 
Evidence Gaps in ‘2000 Mules’
Gregg Phillips of True the Vote says that in Atlanta, the group identified 242 “mules” who went to an average of 24 drop boxes and made an average of eight stops at one of the nonprofits during a two-week period. The group says it proves “coordinated, systematic fraud in all key states where the election was decided” and that the number of alleged illegal votes was enough to swing the 2020 presidential election in Biden’s favor.

But generally, he said, GPS data from apps on cellphones are only accurate to around 40 feet. Research published by the University of Georgia in 2019 concluded that iPhone GPS was only accurate in a range of 7 to 13 meters (23 to 43 feet).

“That’s not accurate enough to tell if someone stopped at a ballot box, or if someone simply walked near the box,” Quintin said. “If it is a high-traffic area, I can think of any number of legitimate reasons why someone would be in the vicinity of a ballot box.”


Update, Feb. 16, 2024: In July 2023, the State Election Board in Georgia sued True the Vote and eventually got a court order in November compelling the group to provide its evidence of a massive ballot-stuffing scheme, including the identity and contact information of people TTV claimed had knowledge of such a scheme.

In a December response first reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Feb. 14, True the Vote failed to provide any information on those individuals. The group’s lawyers for True the Vote stated, “TTV does not have in its possession, custody, or control such identity and contact information.” Neither was True the Vote able to produce confidentiality agreements it had “previously said existed,” the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported.

“True the Vote made wild and false allegations as a fundraising grift that undermined public confidence in the integrity of Georgia’s elections,” Mike Hassinger, a spokesman for the Georgia secretary of state, told us via email. “Now that they’ve admitted to their con in court, they owe the voters of Georgia an apology.”

Evidence Gaps in '2000 Mules' - FactCheck.org
Anybody watching 2000 Mules will see that the criiteria set up was beyond the false depiction in this post. The greater propensity was indeed that certain cell phones belonged to those who were involved in muling.
 
In an isolated area they showed the accused following the dead man as he collected money from several locations, including the spot where he was killed....if you are talking about the two sex offenders wearing gps monitors.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Last edited:
As I watch this again @middleview you don't address a fraction of what is alleged by the protagonists. People just have to watch it on their own and take your critique and decide for themselves.
1. The allegation that D'Souza showed anyone being paid to harvest ballots is completley lacking in evidence. No non-profit was identified. Why not.
2. The gps accuracy was shown to be inadequate to show anyone actually got within 40 or 50 feet of a ballot box.
3. In a number of cases, where the GBI could identify people from 2000 Mules they found the ballots had been for family members. Perfectly legal in Georgia.
4. In no case did 2000 Mules show any of the deposited ballots were not cast by legal voters or that they were cast for Biden and not Trump....

2000 Mules showed zero evidence of fraud.
 
Anybody watching 2000 Mules will see that the criiteria set up was beyond the false depiction in this post. The greater propensity was indeed that certain cell phones belonged to those who were involved in muling.

What is lacking is the evidence that they were paid mules and not delivering ballots for family....which is what the GBI found.
 
I have not idea what you're talking about.
You brought up GPS data used to convict murderers. I offered facts related to one such case...it was not cell phone data and they were wearing ankle monitors and were found to have followed the dead man to where he was killed.

Got a link to the case you wrote about?
 
Back
Top