New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Attention Span

Arkady

President
Setting aside the fact that Trump is an ignorant rage monster with no relevant experience and clear fascistic tendencies, does he have the attention span to be president? There's a reason the man's catch-phrase is two words long and he prefers to communicate in 140 characters or less. Take a look at the second debate. This is a man whose mind clearly wandered repeatedly to the point where he completely lost track of the thread of the debate.

His "responses" frequently lacked even the usual obligatory awkward transition from what was asked to what the candidate would prefer to talk about. For example, at one point, the question was "what would you do about Syria and the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo?" Clinton responded on point, acknowledging the horrible humanitarian crisis in Aleppo, identifying the cause as Russia's focus on destroying the city because it's a stronghold of anti-Assad forces, and then explaining that although we can work with Russia when it comes to fighting ISIS in Syria, she supports going forward with war crimes investigations into what they've done in Aleppo, to hold them accountable. Then it's Trump's turn. He started with a lie about her being Secretary of State when Syria crossed the "line in the sand" (a misquotation, but we'll let that pass), transitioned immediately (and bizarrely) into alleging that Russia's nuclear forces are more up-to-date than ours, then began riffing about rebels in Iraq and Libya, and randomly threw in a reference to the Iran nuclear deal. At that point, the moderator had to remind him the question was about what he'd do about the crisis in Aleppo, since none of the train wreck of disjointed phrases that he spent two minutes vomiting up had anything to do with the topic.

That wasn't even the weirdest of the many examples of him having lost track of the discussion. Directly after Trump took the extraordinary step of saying Hillary Clinton would be in jail if he were in charge of law in this country (a kind of threat we've never seen in modern political history), the moderators asked Clinton about her emails. The moderator recounted the 110 classified emails found on her system and asked incredulously how she could deny that was careless. The candidates and moderators went back and forth about her emails for four minutes, making it one of the more discussed questions of the night, not even counting the time Trump spent discussing emails earlier in the debate, a propos of nothing, when the audience question was actually about modeling good behavior in the debate. Yet, shortly after that, when the question at hand involved healthcare, Trump demanded to know why the moderators weren't bringing up the emails.... which they'd just brought up. Cooper, of course, said "we brought up the e-mails," to which Trump responded "no, it hasn’t." That was probably the first moment in this campaign where I've actually felt sorry for the guy. He seems to be suffering from some sort of dementia, and he's got the indignity of declining that way in the full glare of the public eye.

Whether or not you feel sorry for Trump in his increasingly confused state, he's clearly not someone up to the challenge of the presidency.
 
Feel sorry for Trump?...This Ass Hole can go to hell.....Nov 8th this idiot he gets his ass beat by Hillary Clinton
He's horrible, to be sure. But I watched my grandma descend into Alzheimer's and this is a bit too familiar.
 
Setting aside the fact that Trump is an ignorant rage monster with no relevant experience and clear fascistic tendencies, does he have the attention span to be president? There's a reason the man's catch-phrase is two words long and he prefers to communicate in 140 characters or less. Take a look at the second debate. This is a man whose mind clearly wandered repeatedly to the point where he completely lost track of the thread of the debate.

His "responses" frequently lacked even the usual obligatory awkward transition from what was asked to what the candidate would prefer to talk about. For example, at one point, the question was "what would you do about Syria and the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo?" Clinton responded on point, acknowledging the horrible humanitarian crisis in Aleppo, identifying the cause as Russia's focus on destroying the city because it's a stronghold of anti-Assad forces, and then explaining that although we can work with Russia when it comes to fighting ISIS in Syria, she supports going forward with war crimes investigations into what they've done in Aleppo, to hold them accountable. Then it's Trump's turn. He started with a lie about her being Secretary of State when Syria crossed the "line in the sand" (a misquotation, but we'll let that pass), transitioned immediately (and bizarrely) into alleging that Russia's nuclear forces are more up-to-date than ours, then began riffing about rebels in Iraq and Libya, and randomly threw in a reference to the Iran nuclear deal. At that point, the moderator had to remind him the question was about what he'd do about the crisis in Aleppo, since none of the train wreck of disjointed phrases that he spent two minutes vomiting up had anything to do with the topic.

That wasn't even the weirdest of the many examples of him having lost track of the discussion. Directly after Trump took the extraordinary step of saying Hillary Clinton would be in jail if he were in charge of law in this country (a kind of threat we've never seen in modern political history), the moderators asked Clinton about her emails. The moderator recounted the 110 classified emails found on her system and asked incredulously how she could deny that was careless. The candidates and moderators went back and forth about her emails for four minutes, making it one of the more discussed questions of the night, not even counting the time Trump spent discussing emails earlier in the debate, a propos of nothing, when the audience question was actually about modeling good behavior in the debate. Yet, shortly after that, when the question at hand involved healthcare, Trump demanded to know why the moderators weren't bringing up the emails.... which they'd just brought up. Cooper, of course, said "we brought up the e-mails," to which Trump responded "no, it hasn’t." That was probably the first moment in this campaign where I've actually felt sorry for the guy. He seems to be suffering from some sort of dementia, and he's got the indignity of declining that way in the full glare of the public eye.

Whether or not you feel sorry for Trump in his increasingly confused state, he's clearly not someone up to the challenge of the presidency.
The format of the debate allowed Trump to be all over the place with his answers. If it had been a true townhall where all the questions come from audience members,it would've been a lot harder for him to pull that off.
 
The format of the debate allowed Trump to be all over the place with his answers. If it had been a true townhall where all the questions come from audience members,it would've been a lot harder for him to pull that off.

I think the person who asked the question should be asked if the candidate answered the question.....
 
The format of the debate allowed Trump to be all over the place with his answers. If it had been a true townhall where all the questions come from audience members,it would've been a lot harder for him to pull that off.
It was pretty weird that they mimicked the town hall format for something where only a few questions actually came from the audience.
 
Setting aside the fact that Trump is an ignorant rage monster with no relevant experience and clear fascistic tendencies, does he have the attention span to be president? There's a reason the man's catch-phrase is two words long and he prefers to communicate in 140 characters or less. Take a look at the second debate. This is a man whose mind clearly wandered repeatedly to the point where he completely lost track of the thread of the debate.

His "responses" frequently lacked even the usual obligatory awkward transition from what was asked to what the candidate would prefer to talk about. For example, at one point, the question was "what would you do about Syria and the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo?" Clinton responded on point, acknowledging the horrible humanitarian crisis in Aleppo, identifying the cause as Russia's focus on destroying the city because it's a stronghold of anti-Assad forces, and then explaining that although we can work with Russia when it comes to fighting ISIS in Syria, she supports going forward with war crimes investigations into what they've done in Aleppo, to hold them accountable. Then it's Trump's turn. He started with a lie about her being Secretary of State when Syria crossed the "line in the sand" (a misquotation, but we'll let that pass), transitioned immediately (and bizarrely) into alleging that Russia's nuclear forces are more up-to-date than ours, then began riffing about rebels in Iraq and Libya, and randomly threw in a reference to the Iran nuclear deal. At that point, the moderator had to remind him the question was about what he'd do about the crisis in Aleppo, since none of the train wreck of disjointed phrases that he spent two minutes vomiting up had anything to do with the topic.

That wasn't even the weirdest of the many examples of him having lost track of the discussion. Directly after Trump took the extraordinary step of saying Hillary Clinton would be in jail if he were in charge of law in this country (a kind of threat we've never seen in modern political history), the moderators asked Clinton about her emails. The moderator recounted the 110 classified emails found on her system and asked incredulously how she could deny that was careless. The candidates and moderators went back and forth about her emails for four minutes, making it one of the more discussed questions of the night, not even counting the time Trump spent discussing emails earlier in the debate, a propos of nothing, when the audience question was actually about modeling good behavior in the debate. Yet, shortly after that, when the question at hand involved healthcare, Trump demanded to know why the moderators weren't bringing up the emails.... which they'd just brought up. Cooper, of course, said "we brought up the e-mails," to which Trump responded "no, it hasn’t." That was probably the first moment in this campaign where I've actually felt sorry for the guy. He seems to be suffering from some sort of dementia, and he's got the indignity of declining that way in the full glare of the public eye.

Whether or not you feel sorry for Trump in his increasingly confused state, he's clearly not someone up to the challenge of the presidency.

Paid for by Hillary Clinton for President 2016.
 
Setting aside the fact that Trump is an ignorant rage monster with no relevant experience and clear fascistic tendencies, does he have the attention span to be president? There's a reason the man's catch-phrase is two words long and he prefers to communicate in 140 characters or less. Take a look at the second debate. This is a man whose mind clearly wandered repeatedly to the point where he completely lost track of the thread of the debate.

His "responses" frequently lacked even the usual obligatory awkward transition from what was asked to what the candidate would prefer to talk about. For example, at one point, the question was "what would you do about Syria and the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo?" Clinton responded on point, acknowledging the horrible humanitarian crisis in Aleppo, identifying the cause as Russia's focus on destroying the city because it's a stronghold of anti-Assad forces, and then explaining that although we can work with Russia when it comes to fighting ISIS in Syria, she supports going forward with war crimes investigations into what they've done in Aleppo, to hold them accountable. Then it's Trump's turn. He started with a lie about her being Secretary of State when Syria crossed the "line in the sand" (a misquotation, but we'll let that pass), transitioned immediately (and bizarrely) into alleging that Russia's nuclear forces are more up-to-date than ours, then began riffing about rebels in Iraq and Libya, and randomly threw in a reference to the Iran nuclear deal. At that point, the moderator had to remind him the question was about what he'd do about the crisis in Aleppo, since none of the train wreck of disjointed phrases that he spent two minutes vomiting up had anything to do with the topic.

That wasn't even the weirdest of the many examples of him having lost track of the discussion. Directly after Trump took the extraordinary step of saying Hillary Clinton would be in jail if he were in charge of law in this country (a kind of threat we've never seen in modern political history), the moderators asked Clinton about her emails. The moderator recounted the 110 classified emails found on her system and asked incredulously how she could deny that was careless. The candidates and moderators went back and forth about her emails for four minutes, making it one of the more discussed questions of the night, not even counting the time Trump spent discussing emails earlier in the debate, a propos of nothing, when the audience question was actually about modeling good behavior in the debate. Yet, shortly after that, when the question at hand involved healthcare, Trump demanded to know why the moderators weren't bringing up the emails.... which they'd just brought up. Cooper, of course, said "we brought up the e-mails," to which Trump responded "no, it hasn’t." That was probably the first moment in this campaign where I've actually felt sorry for the guy. He seems to be suffering from some sort of dementia, and he's got the indignity of declining that way in the full glare of the public eye.

Whether or not you feel sorry for Trump in his increasingly confused state, he's clearly not someone up to the challenge of the presidency.

I think this campaign has completely exhausted Trump both physically and mentally.
 
Paid for by Hillary Clinton for President 2016.
What did you think about his weird demand to know why they hadn't brought up the emails shortly after they asked a question about the emails and there was a four-minute segment of the debate dealing with those emails? Did he forget? Did he hope the audience had forgotten? Did his brain mis-fire and he just went for a canned line from his debate prep that had been rendered moot?
 
Setting aside the fact that Trump is an ignorant rage monster with no relevant experience and clear fascistic tendencies, does he have the attention span to be president? There's a reason the man's catch-phrase is two words long and he prefers to communicate in 140 characters or less. Take a look at the second debate. This is a man whose mind clearly wandered repeatedly to the point where he completely lost track of the thread of the debate.

His "responses" frequently lacked even the usual obligatory awkward transition from what was asked to what the candidate would prefer to talk about. For example, at one point, the question was "what would you do about Syria and the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo?" Clinton responded on point, acknowledging the horrible humanitarian crisis in Aleppo, identifying the cause as Russia's focus on destroying the city because it's a stronghold of anti-Assad forces, and then explaining that although we can work with Russia when it comes to fighting ISIS in Syria, she supports going forward with war crimes investigations into what they've done in Aleppo, to hold them accountable. Then it's Trump's turn. He started with a lie about her being Secretary of State when Syria crossed the "line in the sand" (a misquotation, but we'll let that pass), transitioned immediately (and bizarrely) into alleging that Russia's nuclear forces are more up-to-date than ours, then began riffing about rebels in Iraq and Libya, and randomly threw in a reference to the Iran nuclear deal. At that point, the moderator had to remind him the question was about what he'd do about the crisis in Aleppo, since none of the train wreck of disjointed phrases that he spent two minutes vomiting up had anything to do with the topic.

That wasn't even the weirdest of the many examples of him having lost track of the discussion. Directly after Trump took the extraordinary step of saying Hillary Clinton would be in jail if he were in charge of law in this country (a kind of threat we've never seen in modern political history), the moderators asked Clinton about her emails. The moderator recounted the 110 classified emails found on her system and asked incredulously how she could deny that was careless. The candidates and moderators went back and forth about her emails for four minutes, making it one of the more discussed questions of the night, not even counting the time Trump spent discussing emails earlier in the debate, a propos of nothing, when the audience question was actually about modeling good behavior in the debate. Yet, shortly after that, when the question at hand involved healthcare, Trump demanded to know why the moderators weren't bringing up the emails.... which they'd just brought up. Cooper, of course, said "we brought up the e-mails," to which Trump responded "no, it hasn’t." That was probably the first moment in this campaign where I've actually felt sorry for the guy. He seems to be suffering from some sort of dementia, and he's got the indignity of declining that way in the full glare of the public eye.

Whether or not you feel sorry for Trump in his increasingly confused state, he's clearly not someone up to the challenge of the presidency.
Trump is clearly a toad.
 
What did you think about his weird demand to know why they hadn't brought up the emails shortly after they asked a question about the emails and there was a four-minute segment of the debate dealing with those emails? Did he forget? Did he hope the audience had forgotten? Did his brain mis-fire and he just went for a canned line from his debate prep that had been rendered moot?

You seem to think I'm actually reading your (re)posts.
 
I think this campaign has completely exhausted Trump both physically and mentally.
Yes. He does seem pretty low energy, at this point. He lacks stamina -- sometimes he comes out of the gate in an almost manic state, sniffing and barking thought fragments, but well before the hour has run, he is trudging along looking like a man who hopes someone will take mercy and prop him up. I suppose nothing in his life prepared him for this. He never had to hustle, because life was handed to him on a silver platter by his obscenely wealthy father. And he's spent much of the last decade or so as little more than a B-list celeb -- sitting around gossiping with giggling sycophants. The slog of a campaign is nothing like having the brainless Billy Bush squealing "The Donald has scored." It's real work, where he is challenged in a way that daddy's money always protected him from in the past. He never learned to be tough, and it's showing.
 
I'm simply calling everyone's attention to the fact that you know you're not up to that task.

I think "everyone's attention" is likely directed at the fact that you regard a semi-literate troglodyte like @Saladin2 as "smart" when he can't even spell basic words or form a single coherent sentence. That, and your propensity to (re)post Clinton campaign propaganda, display your massive personal insecurities, and voice support for anti-American, anti-Semitic terrorist organizations puts you very low on the totem pole around here. Believe me.
 
as I've asserted endlessly, I'm not voting either from trump or Hillary.

but if you're concerned about Trump's health, let's conduct a little thought experiment,okay?

imagine the distance between the US Capitol, and the White House. It's a little under 3 miles, I believe.

which candidate would be able to complete this walk unassisted? Without getting lost, fainting, needing an aide with an injector, losing attention?

Don't over think this. It isn't a trick question.

Aerial_view_from_above_the_U.S._Capitol_17223v-mall.jpg
 
I think "everyone's attention" is likely directed at the fact that you regard a semi-literate troglodyte like @Saladin2 as "smart" when he can't even spell basic words or form a single coherent sentence.

Saladin clearly doesn't bother proofing before he posts, but I'm in no position to judge him for that, since I don't either. My posts are full of misspellings and occasional sentences that have been turned into gibberish by an error. So it goes. But, he's someone who actually comments meaningfully on the substance of posts, rather than just, say, copying and pasting the same inane one-liner over and over, to troll people.
 
Back
Top