Airing the DNC's dirty laundry certainly benefited the GOP. It was nice to see under the hood at how corrupt and cynical the DNC is of the populace. However, that isn't evidence of GOP action. It's speculation.
Meanwhile, there's no credible evidence that it was even Russia, so you really have to stop strutting around here claiming it as some sort of fact.
The source of the claim that Russian agents had hacked the DNC server was cyber security company CrowdStrike, hired by the Democratic Party to investigate its data breach. But, when interviewed by the HIC in December 2017, CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry admitted they had no good evidence that data was even hacked from the DNC’s server, let alone that Russian hackers had done so
The “Russian connection” was baldly asserted by the Democratic Party, US intelligence officials and the corporate media
www.wsws.org
But, let's not stop here...
The Democrats stood to gain from Flynn's name being leaked to the media. Does that mean that, in your eyes, they did it? Because that's very illegal.
The Democrats stood to gain by abusing power to keep open an investigation that had no evidence and was about to be shut down. Does that mean, in your eyes, they did it? Because that's illegal.
The list could go on. Either hold the consistent standard and condemn the Democrats, or just expose yourself as hack, it's your choice.