New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

"Big Bang Theory" from Satan?

There is a move afoot now to have people in Broun's highly gerrymandered district write in Charles Darwin. There's no way Broun can lose this seat in deepest, darkest Georgia, but they hope to get enough votes for Darwin to shame the Republicans into at least relieving Broun of his science committee appointment.

AP Link
 
There is a move afoot now to have people in Broun's highly gerrymandered district write in Charles Darwin. There's no way Broun can lose this seat in deepest, darkest Georgia, but they hope to get enough votes for Darwin to shame the Republicans into at least relieving Broun of his science committee appointment.

AP Link

"God's word is true," Broun said in the video. "I've come to understand that. All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and Big Bang theory, all that is[sic] lies straight from the pit of hell. And it's lies to try to keep me and all the folks who are taught that from understanding that they need a savior."

....and the GOPpers appointed this guy to the House Science Committee!
 
Considering we still have no clue what the nature of the universe even is yet, do you think it wise to discount any theory without proof to the contrary?
 
"God's word is true," Broun said in the video. "I've come to understand that. All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and Big Bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of hell. And it's lies to try to keep me and all the folks who are taught that from understanding that they need a savior."

....and the GOPpers appointed this guy to the House Science Committee!

I'm struggling to decide which political view is loonier, Broun's anti-Darwinist creationism or Obama's anti-capitalist fair-shareism...
 
"God's word is true," Broun said in the video. "I've come to understand that. All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and Big Bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of hell. And it's lies to try to keep me and all the folks who are taught that from understanding that they need a savior."

....and the GOPpers appointed this guy to the House Science Committee!



It's difficult for me to grasp the concept that a major American political party has been reduced to such a state of irrationality. Surely the Republican Party is teetering on the verge of a great purge and rebirth? I simply can't comprehend the concept of any political party maintaining electoral viability while eschewing reality in exchange for a faith-based ideology that places belief in magic above logic.
 
The reality is that advanced concepts of the laws of physics are beyond the comprehension of the intellectually diminutive among us. Just chalk it all up to turtles. ;)

a2.bp.blogspot.com__l3TkP_oqsTw_TtIPbNBJa6I_AAAAAAAAEAc_C_f5pL4UpCQ_s400_turtlesallthewaydown.jpg
 
Considering we still have no clue what the nature of how the universe even is yet, do you think it wise to discount any theory without proof to the contrary?
I think my degree in physics, even though it's only a B.S., gives me a better idea of how the universe works than you.

Regarding evidence to the contrary, I refer you to the past 40 years of Journal of Theoretical Astrophysics.
 
The reality is that advanced concepts of the laws of physics are beyond the comprehension of the intellectually diminutive among us.
Which laws of physics? Those concurrent with classical universal theory or string theory? Was there a big bang? And if so, what was the impetus? Was it Aristotle's prime mover? If so, how do you resolve infinite regression?
For all we know, we could be riding on turtles.
 
Considering we still have no clue what the nature of the universe even is yet, do you think it wise to discount any theory without proof to the contrary?

The Encyclopedia Britannica: Evolution, or the common descent of all living organisms, is a fact as well-established as the facts that the Earth is round, rotates on its axis, and revolves around the Sun.

LeRoy: Perhaps you are under the impression that The Encyclopedia Britannica is a far-left Marxist piece of propaganda. But never mind that. Any day now, I expect to hear Representative Paul Broun attacking the heliocentric theory, and this crazy idea that the Earth is spinnin' around on its axis like a top. Another one of Satan's Lies, no doubt.
 
Do you? Great, then which theory of the universe do you ascribe to? Classical or String? Because your answer will determine which big bang theory you ascribe to. And do you ascribe to a prime mover? If not, then what created the big bang? If you do, then how do you resolve infinite regression?
 
Do you? Great, then which theory of the universe do you ascribe to? Classical or String? Because your answer will determine which big bang theory you ascribe to. And do you ascribe to a prime mover? If not, then what created the big bang? If you do, then how do you resolve infinite regression?

It certainly is amusing that you think there are two, and exactly two, and only two, versions of the Big Bang theory. Want to talk about the results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe [WMAP]?
 
Considering the number of "nutters" on your side, I wouldn't be gloating if I were you.

And how did he get to be "mine". I am neither a republican nor a Christian.
 
Then please enlighten us, what is the reality of the big bang?
My field of physics was acoustics, so I know little more about astrophysics than being able to follow a Scientific American article about it, but even that level, I fear it's beyond your capabilities, so I'll not waste my time with your silly challenge.
 
HAHAHAHA!!!! Great conversation Colfax, I have a lot more respect for your superior mind now. You definitely earned your "BS"
 
Back
Top