New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Bombshell !

FakeName said:
You realize right that the Precedent has also been set that president's make public at least 20 years of tax returns.

Not the law. Not a rule. Just precedent.

Trump refused.

You have no problem with that.

Why the selective outrage?

want it both ways?
Click to expand...
So?

There is no requirement to release tax returns. If Congress thinks that is a big deal they are free to pass a law requiring it.

All this Democratic bedwetting over Trump's tax returns means nothing.
 
Drumcollie said:
If that were true...You would have some.
Click to expand...
I do.

What I said is a fact.

Instead of implying something that doesnt exist why not prove me wrong with the law or rule requiring it?

Why not?

Because you cant. There is no such rule or law.

The vote is required at the end, not the beginning.

Just like I said.
 
Nostra said:
So?

There is no requirement to release tax returns. If Congress thinks that is a big deal they are free to pass a law requiring it.

All this Dimwinger bedwetting over Trump's tax returns means nothing.
Click to expand...
Right.

And there is no requirement to have a vote to open an impeachment hearing.

If congress thinks this is a big deal they are free to pass a law requiring it.

Now do you finally get my point?

"All this Trumpwinger bedwetting over pelosi not holding a vote to open impeachment hearings means nothing."
.

You are so bad at this!
 
FakeName said:
Right.

And there is no requirement to have a vote to open an impeachment hearing.

If congress thinks this is a big deal they are free to pass a law requiring it.

Now do you finally get my point?

"All this Trumpwinger bedwetting over pelosi not holding a vote to open impeachment hearings means nothing."
.

You are so bad at this!
Click to expand...

The House acts by voting. It has never voted to conduct an inquiry into whether President Trump should be impeached.
Consequently, there is no House impeachment inquiry or hearing going on.
 
Nutty Cortez said:
The House acts by voting. It has never voted to conduct an inquiry into whether President Trump should be impeached.
Consequently, there is no House impeachment inquiry or hearing going on.
Click to expand...
Ah but there is an impeachment inquiry.

OBVIOUSLY.

There is no law or rule requiring a vote to open an impeachment inquiry. If there was you all would have proved me wrong a month ago by quoting the rule or law.

You didn't because you can't.

No such rule or law exists

The constitution does require a vote on articles of impeachment at the END of the ivestigation. Not at the beginning.
 
Drumcollie said:
What was the vote?
Click to expand...
There is no law or rule requiring a vote to open an impeachment inquiry. If there was you all would have proved me wrong a month ago by quoting the rule or law.

You didn't because you can't.

No such rule or law exists

The constitution does require a vote on articles of impeachment at the END of the ivestigation. Not at the beginning.
 
FakeName said:
I do.

What I said is a fact.

Instead of implying something that doesnt exist why not prove me wrong with the law or rule requiring it?

Why not?

Because you cant. There is no such rule or law.

The vote is required at the end, not the beginning.

Just like I said.
Click to expand...
Where can I get these facts? Raw Story? The Daily Kos? Wonkette? CNN? NPR? How about you give a real source and I will do what you can't...Search for the truth.
 
FakeName said:
Ah but there is an impeachment inquiry.

OBVIOUSLY.

There is no law or rule requiring a vote to open an impeachment inquiry. If there was you all would have proved me wrong a month ago by quoting the rule or law.

You didn't because you can't.

No such rule or law exists

The constitution does require a vote on articles of impeachment at the END of the ivestigation. Not at the beginning.
Click to expand...
What was the vote?
 
FakeName said:
There is no law or rule requiring a vote to open an impeachment inquiry. If there was you all would have proved me wrong a month ago by quoting the rule or law.

You didn't because you can't.

No such rule or law exists

The constitution does require a vote on articles of impeachment at the END of the ivestigation. Not at the beginning.
Click to expand...

So basically it all talk and meaningless...That's fair.
 
FakeName said:
.
The constitution does require a vote on articles of impeachment at the END of the ivestigation. Not at the beginning
Click to expand...
So three years later, you still have only the rhetoric. You still lost and are still mad...Err TIPSY.
 
Drumcollie said:
Where can I get these facts? Raw Story? The Daily Kos? Wonkette? CNN? NPR? How about you give a real source and I will do what you can't...Search for the truth.
Click to expand...
Article 1, section 2, of the US constitution.

And the House rules.

If I am wrong why does every single one of you continually fail to cite the rule or law that requires a vote to open an impeachment hearing?

If I am wrong prove it.

It should be simple.

cite the rule or law that requires a vote to open an impeachment hearing.

You can't because no such rule or law exists.

Education is a good thing. It is not to late to start. Do it for your country.

This is a good place to start.

https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Impeachment_Role.htm
 
FakeName said:
You realize right that the Precedent has also been set that president's make public at least 20 years of tax returns.

Not the law. Not a rule. Just precedent.

Trump refused.

You have no problem with that.

Why the selective outrage?

want it both ways?
Click to expand...

Quick...Divert because I can't answer how the impeachment vote went.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top