Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Who voted for it....Oops no impeachment. Some one is a little:
TIPSY...Trump Impeachment Pretend Syndrome Yearnings.
Bombshell !
- Thread starter Spamature
- Start date
TIPSY...Trump Impeachment Pretend Syndrome Yearnings.
Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
What was the vote? Oops that's where we are.
Nostra
Governor
So?
There is no requirement to release tax returns. If Congress thinks that is a big deal they are free to pass a law requiring it.
All this Democratic bedwetting over Trump's tax returns means nothing.
Nostra
Governor
I am.
I do.
What I said is a fact.
Instead of implying something that doesnt exist why not prove me wrong with the law or rule requiring it?
Why not?
Because you cant. There is no such rule or law.
The vote is required at the end, not the beginning.
Just like I said.
Right.
And there is no requirement to have a vote to open an impeachment hearing.
If congress thinks this is a big deal they are free to pass a law requiring it.
Now do you finally get my point?
"All this Trumpwinger bedwetting over pelosi not holding a vote to open impeachment hearings means nothing."
.
You are so bad at this!
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
The House acts by voting. It has never voted to conduct an inquiry into whether President Trump should be impeached.
Consequently, there is no House impeachment inquiry or hearing going on.
Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
What was the vote?
Ah but there is an impeachment inquiry.
OBVIOUSLY.
There is no law or rule requiring a vote to open an impeachment inquiry. If there was you all would have proved me wrong a month ago by quoting the rule or law.
You didn't because you can't.
No such rule or law exists
The constitution does require a vote on articles of impeachment at the END of the ivestigation. Not at the beginning.
There is no law or rule requiring a vote to open an impeachment inquiry. If there was you all would have proved me wrong a month ago by quoting the rule or law.
You didn't because you can't.
No such rule or law exists
The constitution does require a vote on articles of impeachment at the END of the ivestigation. Not at the beginning.
Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Where can I get these facts? Raw Story? The Daily Kos? Wonkette? CNN? NPR? How about you give a real source and I will do what you can't...Search for the truth.
Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
What was the vote?
Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
So basically it all talk and meaningless...That's fair.
Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
So three years later, you still have only the rhetoric. You still lost and are still mad...Err TIPSY.
Article 1, section 2, of the US constitution.
And the House rules.
If I am wrong why does every single one of you continually fail to cite the rule or law that requires a vote to open an impeachment hearing?
If I am wrong prove it.
It should be simple.
cite the rule or law that requires a vote to open an impeachment hearing.
You can't because no such rule or law exists.
Education is a good thing. It is not to late to start. Do it for your country.
This is a good place to start.
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Impeachment_Role.htm
No.
It is a formal impeachment inquiry as per the constitution of the United States of America.
just the facts mam.
Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Quick...Divert because I can't answer how the impeachment vote went.
