New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Bombshell !

SoccerMom said:
Oh please. "Was told" is second hand information at best. Not admissible in a trial.
Two, turns out this guy sat on the board of Burissma too. Whoopsie. And he met with Schiff's aids before he testified. Not exactly an impartial witness, is he?
Finally, diplomatic quid pro quo is how things get done, is used by virtually every government entity, and above all: ISN'T A CRIME. Anywhere. And you don't want it to be.
This is another nothing burger.
Click to expand...
I think it would be illegal for him to hold that job and be the ambassador to that country at the same time.

So do you have a link where that attests to him holding this job ?
 
JuliefromOhio said:
Since the Republicans on the committees that are deposing Bill Taylor and several other witnesses have leaked NOTHING, it's evident that Republicans have heard NOTHING that would make Trump look not guilty.
Click to expand...
Schiff is withholding the transcripts from Republicans' possession. They have nothing in their possession to leak. Yet, somehow, the transcript of Taylor's opening statement found it's way to the media. That's left wing corruption top to bottom.
 
Spamature said:
GOP congress went POOP in their pants after hearing about Taylor's testimony, and then stormed the the secure area in the House.

Apparently they were trying to find a place to clean up after the shock.
Click to expand...

Then they need to release his testimony to the public. All of it. Why continue to leak his opening statement without the accompanying grilling? Got any explanation for it other than he was blown up? Seems as if it's disingenuous
 
Mick said:
Then they need to release his testimony to the public. All of it. Why continue to leak his opening statement without the accompanying grilling? Got any explanation for it other than he was blown up? Seems as if it's disingenuous
Click to expand...
Because they do not want future witnesses to be able to change their stories or details based upon the testimony of previous witnesses.

You know like how the cops question suspects separately to see if their stories match up.
 
Spamature said:
Because they do not want future witnesses to be able to change their stories or details based upon the testimony of previous witnesses.

You know like how the cops question suspects separately to see if their stories match up.
Click to expand...
Lol. Except the Democrats leaked his opening statement, dunce. Try thinking for once.
 
Mick said:
Lol. Except the Democrats leaked his opening statement, dunce. Try thinking for once.
Click to expand...
The cops release selected details of investigations all the time. It helps with getting more witnesses to come forward. Clinton's impeachment leaked like a sieve under Republicans.
 
Spamature said:
The cops release selected details of investigations all the time. It helps with getting more witnesses to come forward. Clinton's impeachment leaked like a sieve under Republicans.
Click to expand...

So cops selective release damaging testimony on people they claim to be investigating while simultaneously withholding exculpatory facts is "due process"? Christ, now I know why there are such human rights abuses in left wing banana republics. Insanity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top