New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

BOOBSHELL!!! DNC sued by democrats over Sanders!

C

Capitalist

Guest
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...suit-alleging-sanders-was-robbed-in-2016.html

Look at the protest signs. DEMexit! Noodle that one for a bit.

Remember this issue? Well, it ain't going away. It just hasn't been reported on in a long time but the lawsuit continues.

Here are some notable quotables from the DNC side:


1495464570795.jpg



Bruce Spiva, a lawyer for the DNC, argued in its motion to dismiss that the party holds the right to select its candidate any way it chooses and is not bound by pledges of fairness.


“We could have voluntarily decided that, ‘Look, we’re gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way.’ That's not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right,” Spiva argued.


Although the Article 5, Section 4 of the Democratic Party charter stipulates that it will function with total neutrality during Democratic primaries, the DNC lawyer argued the promise was non-binding.


“And there's no right to not have your candidate disadvantaged or have another candidate advantaged. There's no contractual obligation here,” he said.


Well, howdoya like that, libs? Your vote in the primary really doesn't count! You could have voted overwhelmingly for Bernie Sanders and you'd still have the DNC's choice shoved down your throat. I guess you don't care because you've accepted your current marching orders and are whining about Hillary forgetting entirely about your disenfranchisement in the primary.

Now, before you go off with a clever retort of, "Republicans do it too," let me remind you: To the RNC establishment, Donald Trump was the LEAST palatable candidate of the 16 or so running. Hell, even I didn't vote for him in the general election. But the fact that he won the primary in spite of his intolerable nature instead of somebody more palatable like Cruz or Rubio tells you that republican primary votes actually count.

Sanders was simply shut out. Barred. Your democratic primary votes are nothing more than play votes. You might as well be first graders play voting and writing names on slips of paper and passing them to the front. Your votes end up in the trash just like theirs.

And clearly it ain't gonna change. So why do you even bother?
 
No, that's some quack suing in Sanders stead not Sanders himself...

Dem primaries are over, kkkonservatives attempts to deflect from Red Don's Nixon wanna be actions aren't going to work.

Look KKKons, love America more than Russia and everything will be just fine k?

thx
 
No, that's some quack suing in Sanders stead not Sanders himself...
Dem primaries are over, kkkonservatives attempts to deflect from Red Don's Nixon wanna be actions aren't going to work.

Look KKKons, love America more than Russia and everything will be just fine k?

I didn't say Sanders was suing the DNC. Can you read, like, the title?

And heads up. Your "k" button is sticky. You're welcome.

And your vote still doesn't count.
 
No, that's some quack suing in Sanders stead not Sanders himself...

Dem primaries are over, kkkonservatives attempts to deflect from Red Don's Nixon wanna be actions aren't going to work.

Look KKKons, love America more than Russia and everything will be just fine k?

thx

He never said it was Sanders suing. Please learn to read. Let me guess: you went to public schools and are against school choice. And who are these kkkonservatives you keep ranting and raving about anyway?
 
I didn't say Sanders was suing the DNC. Can you read, like, the title?

And heads up. Your "k" button is sticky. You're welcome.

And your vote still doesn't count.

DNC HQ: Our voters are too dumb to decide who the nominee should be!

Democrat troll: I'm OK with that!
 
A nothing news lawsuit about nothing ... only kkkonservatives care



You voted for this guy ... k? thx

donald-trump-truck-afp_650x400_41490320339.jpg

You're babbling again. Conservatives have nothing to do with this lawsuit.

PS: I didn't vote for Trump. I just enjoy watching anti-Trump neanderthals engage in their insanity. Check yours out some time, it's a hoot!
 
at the time of the original revelations in 2016, the DNC got some "legal expert" to write an opinion piece asserting that the DNC could ignore, rewrite, or break their own election rules at will, because there was no law against cheating voters in primaries.
 
No, that's some quack suing in Sanders stead not Sanders himself...

Dem primaries are over, kkkonservatives attempts to deflect from Red Don's Nixon wanna be actions aren't going to work.

Look KKKons, love America more than Russia and everything will be just fine k?

thx

when you try to appear smart and look stupidly

perfect example of the liberal public education on display for all to see!
 
Democrats are suing the Democratic National Committee for disenfranchising their vote.

Keep whistling past the graveyard.

I guess to him, rigging a primary and suppressing the will of the voters is no big deal. What other conclusion can we draw?
 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...suit-alleging-sanders-was-robbed-in-2016.html

Look at the protest signs. DEMexit! Noodle that one for a bit.

Remember this issue? Well, it ain't going away. It just hasn't been reported on in a long time but the lawsuit continues.

Here are some notable quotables from the DNC side:


1495464570795.jpg



Bruce Spiva, a lawyer for the DNC, argued in its motion to dismiss that the party holds the right to select its candidate any way it chooses and is not bound by pledges of fairness.


“We could have voluntarily decided that, ‘Look, we’re gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way.’ That's not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right,” Spiva argued.


Although the Article 5, Section 4 of the Democratic Party charter stipulates that it will function with total neutrality during Democratic primaries, the DNC lawyer argued the promise was non-binding.


“And there's no right to not have your candidate disadvantaged or have another candidate advantaged. There's no contractual obligation here,” he said.


Well, howdoya like that, libs? Your vote in the primary really doesn't count! You could have voted overwhelmingly for Bernie Sanders and you'd still have the DNC's choice shoved down your throat. I guess you don't care because you've accepted your current marching orders and are whining about Hillary forgetting entirely about your disenfranchisement in the primary.

Now, before you go off with a clever retort of, "Republicans do it too," let me remind you: To the RNC establishment, Donald Trump was the LEAST palatable candidate of the 16 or so running. Hell, even I didn't vote for him in the general election. But the fact that he won the primary in spite of his intolerable nature instead of somebody more palatable like Cruz or Rubio tells you that republican primary votes actually count.

Sanders was simply shut out. Barred. Your democratic primary votes are nothing more than play votes. You might as well be first graders play voting and writing names on slips of paper and passing them to the front. Your votes end up in the trash just like theirs.

And clearly it ain't gonna change. So why do you even bother?


Sanders got fewer votes than Clinton. That is the bottom line. None of the emails show that the DNC did anything to cause that to happen. Now there is a lawyer who stands to make a few million bucks if he can persuade a judge that the DNC "misappropriated" money donated to Sanders. Good luck with that.
 
Sanders got fewer votes than Clinton. That is the bottom line. None of the emails show that the DNC did anything to cause that to happen. Now there is a lawyer who stands to make a few million bucks if he can persuade a judge that the DNC "misappropriated" money donated to Sanders. Good luck with that.


Sanders and his supporters were ripped off by the SuperDelegate scam, plus proven collusion within the DNC in their desperation to nominate an establishment/Russian owned candidate (Hillary).
 
I guess to him, rigging a primary and suppressing the will of the voters is no big deal. What other conclusion can we draw?

"Rigging a primary"? How exactly was the primary rigged? Sanders didn't get as many votes....he lost. Since Clinton got more votes it was the will of the people that she be the candidate...as opposed to the general election where the will of the people was ignored in favor of letting the electoral college decide.
 
Back
Top