Boca
Governor
Is this Troll Tuesday?Ok, Adolph. Whatever you say...
Do you, by any chance, have a link to any of the CRT course material that you think qualifies as Nazi indoctrination?
Is this Troll Tuesday?Ok, Adolph. Whatever you say...
Do you, by any chance, have a link to any of the CRT course material that you think qualifies as Nazi indoctrination?
You're here...so yes.Is this Troll Tuesday?
Also education benefits.Was there racist intent in the GI bill? I'm not aware of that and I went to school using those benefits.
I did some research and I believe what you are talking about is the benefit for low down or no down payments on homes...the problem being that while they were entitled to the benefit, many areas would not allow black families to buy homes there.
It was not racism in the bill.
Appears MV gets away with name callingIs this Troll Tuesday?
Hmmm, didn't you just call me a name?Appears MV gets away with name calling
Your nick is middleview=MVHmmm, didn't you just call me a name?
Same answerI can't imagine why any white person would object.
Post #39Your nick is middleview=MV
Need tissues
Buddy it's the sobsdd with them, why waste your time on trolls?Your nick is middleview=MV
Need tissues
Put his ass back in ignoreBuddy it's the sobsdd with them, why waste your time on trolls?
That's not the GI bill.Don't know about racist, but there is this important fact about the guy who signed the GI bill...
Truman signed Executive Order 9981 on July 26, 1948, calling for the desegregation of the U.S. Armed Forces, he repudiated 170 years of officially sanctioned discrimination. ... It became a crucial step toward inspiring other parts of American society to accept desegregation
I was mocking you, Julie. The GI bill did NOT discriminate against minorities. It was assistance for education and buying property, and any GI was eligible. Blacks were under-represented in its beneficiaries because they have traditionally lagged in education and (not coincidentally) occupational achievement. If you couldn't pass the admissions test, you didn't get into college (at least not back then when admissions were merit based) and you didn't get GI educational benefits. Same with a home loan - if you couldn't pass the solvency test to qualify for a mortgage, you didn't get GI Bill mortgage assistance. This is simply CRT radical Marxists revising history - "unequal outcomes is evidence of (systemic) racism." That is, of course, complete rat sh*t...Ah, you admit there was racism in the GI bill. That's a start.
It offers one example of why whites were able to accumulate more wealth than blacks. Whites were given a leg up.
None of us were taught that......which is why I want our kids taught an accurate history of race, and not the whitewashed version we were taught.
For chrissakes...here is what I posted.That's not the GI bill.
What you're describing is the systemic racism that made black vets unable to use the GI bill benefits.I was mocking you, Julie. The GI bill did NOT discriminate against minorities. It was assistance for education and buying property, and any GI was eligible. Blacks were under-represented in its beneficiaries because they have traditionally lagged in education and (not coincidentally) occupational achievement. If you couldn't pass the admissions test, you didn't get into college (at least not back then when admissions were merit based) and you didn't get GI educational benefits. Same with a home loan - if you couldn't pass the solvency test to qualify for a mortgage, you didn't get GI Bill mortgage assistance. This is simply CRT radical Marxists revising history - "unequal outcomes is evidence of (systemic) racism." That is, of course, complete rat sh*t...
I agree. It should be taught in K-12 grades. The history being taught now is false."Critical race theory is an academic concept that is more than 40 years old. The core idea is that racism is a social construct, and that it is not merely the product of individual bias or prejudice, but also something embedded in legal systems and policies."
It should be taught in school. I can't imagine why anyone would object.
Thank you.What you're describing is the systemic racism that made black vets unable to use the GI bill benefits.
Unequal schooling -> black vets being unprepared to use GI bill for college.
Black vets were unable to use the GI bill for home loans. They were stopped by banks, by redlining, by systemic racism in the system. Home ownership was the main way whites were able to accumulate wealth. That was denied blacks leading to the inequity we see to this day.
They could barely handle Black History Month. I believe they felt oppressed by it. LOLI agree. It should be taught in K-12 grades. The history being taught now is false.
Truman didn't sign the GI bill.For chrissakes...here is what I posted.
Don't know about racist, but there is this important fact about the guy who signed the GI bill...
Truman signed Executive Order 9981 on July 26, 1948, calling for the desegregation of the U.S. Armed Forces, he repudiated 170 years of officially sanctioned discrimination. ... It became a crucial step toward inspiring other parts of American society to accept desegregation
Where did I say it was the GI bill?