New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Cashing in and low standards

TomFitz

Mayor
She had her 15 minutes of fame and no fortune, another poor Democratic slob thrown under the bus by the Liberal Overlords fo the DemonicRat Party.

I thought I would share this unfortunate post. Ostensibly it's about Sandra Fluke. It is the usual rude and vulgar attack. But what's more, it reflects the very low standards that the hard right sets for leaders and for people in public life.

Consider the meat of the attack.

How was Sandra Fluke "thrown under the bus" by liberals? It seems as if she testified about an issue she was active in before Congress. There is no evidence that she had any other motive. Fame and fortune did not enter into it. She is not meeting with ghost writers, negotiating a contract to be a "Guest commentator" on a partisan public relations TV network, and she's not doing the rounds of the talk shows.

But for many conservatives , getting involved in government and public policy apparently must involve the ulterior motive of "fame and fortune".

I wonder why that is?

Perhaps it's because they're conditioned to it.

After all, the conservative movement over the past few years has been populated with people who gained notoriety and cashed in. Sarah Palin is exhibit one. Joe the Plumber is another. Both were actively promoted by the conservative noise machine, and both have cashed in. Public service doesn't really seem to mean much to either one of them.

Then there are opportunists who used their connections to use the political process to cash in for themselves, while trying to pass themselves off as champions of the cause. Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich fit this mold. Here again, self aggrandizement is far more important to both of these men than is serving the country. Newt Gingrich serves so many of the people that his various organizations occupy several floors of a building on K Street. Herman Cain has a shorter list; RJ Reynolds and Koch Industries.

And finally there's Donald Trump, who used political grandstanding to promote the flagging ratings of his television show. Again, public service was talked about, but it was apparent that the "candidate" had little real interest in it.

The sad thing is that many conservatives, particularly of the talk radio/Fox New variety, take this sort of tabloid politics for granted. They seem to think that politics is a big game show played on the radio every afternoon. Of course, the media feeds that for ratings. (that is bi partisan).

But the modern conservative movement is so shot through with the "I've got mine, now screw you" mentality, that much of the audience for people like Cain, Palin, Limbaugh etc actually expect this as a norm.

And they wonder why they get the leaders they have.
 
I will take my "Low Standards" over the Left's "NO Standards...."
 
geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezus, all that just trying to say NO she wasn't thrown under the bus by liberals..

well, Pelosi delivered Fluke unto the altar, got what she wanted and BAM............she was gone.
 
No, what it is is that she wants her views codified into law. So she trots herself out in front of Congress and (basically) lobbies for her pet issue (subsidies for the feminist agenda). The fact that she is arguably gay and would have no legitimate use for (non-medical) "contraception" only makes her lobbying efforts more crass. She is trying to make us pay for her pet cause. She's (frankly) no different from the farmer lobbying for ethanol or the defense contractor lobbying for weapons purchases. I don't see how she's all that different from those Republican hucksters you decry.
 
Interesting isn't it, Tom....how they'll attack somebody for COMPLETELY CONTRADICTORY things.

Fluke gets a book deal...they'll claim she's "See? See? She's cashing in...it was all about money"

Fluke doesnt' get a book deal....they'll claim "See? See? Liberals probably promised Fluke a book deal...now they're throwing her under the bus!"

They even contradict their OWN earlier spin....first it was "Fluke is just a co-conspirattor with the Dems to make Rush and the Right look bad".....now it's "Fluke was USED by the Dems to make Rush and the Right look bad!"

And as Orwell showed us in "1984"....they can believe the newer version is "true" and the older one never existed...or even that BOTH are "true".
 
amazing how you always know what others will say and think before they say/think ti and then you claim others do what you always do......

hypocrite much
 
well said tom

if anything, she represents as noted from the beginning, a Joan of Arc like figure who survived the onslaught of the enemy

what that comment by that poster really represents more than anything else imo, is the all too common hollow declaration representitive of nothing but their hollow heads. The dems have "abandoned her/thrown her under the bus" how I'd like to know. It's a false and therefore pointless point/effort that is all too common from that crew. Most of them don't even know what the essential elements of an argument are, starting with the requirement that falsehoods are taboo, unless of course you want faulty conclusions and your ass stomped like you did his.
 
The ones who also bought gold on my advice likely are. By the way, thanks for always bringing this up so I can keep showing off:

I'm taking about your "analysis" of the Stock Market in 2010.....which you DON'T like always being brought up.
 
One problem with that bunch. The old Farts are dying off, just like Rush's fans! :eek:) They still slobber after Saran,but that is just wishful thinking.

Any rightwinger who denies that "sex appeal" isn't a major factor in the love and adoration of Palin.....could try explaining why they never went all "doe eyed" over conservative women like Jeanne Kirkpatrick or Kate O'Beirne.
 
she trots herself out in front of Congress and (basically) lobbies for her pet issue

Why do you think people testify before Congress?????

I think that it's very interesting that last week, you and the rest of them were all yelling that "Fluke had so much sex that she needed contractptives by the ton". and now you're claiming that she's "arguably gay"

That's really amazing. Even for you.
 
Back
Top