New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Claer & Concise

Zam-Zam

Senator
Solid analysis:

As usual, the national press has essentially misreported a very important story: the nation’s reaction to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Utah authorities are providing the best factual accounting. Here are the most important points:

- The alleged killer, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, is not cooperating in the investigation.

- However, Robinson’s parents are giving information.

- Robinson’s live-in roommate, a person transitioning from male to female, is also speaking to investigators.

- Tyler Robinson apparently spent a lot of time on radical left social media hate sites. The Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox, calls them “dark corners of the internet.”

- Robinson will appear in court on Tuesday. He will most likely plead not guilty, although the evidence against him is overwhelming. His lawyers will probably go for the insanity defense.

As for a wider analysis, it breaks down along ideological lines. A number of far-left Americans are happy that Charlie Kirk was murdered. These are emotionally troubled people, some of whom are losing their jobs.

After Matthew Dowd was fired by MSNBC, the ardent left in the media quickly retreated. Paychecks usually trump ideology. On Fox News, Howard Kurtz said that Mr. Kirk “was not a saint.” That is a flat-out dumb statement. None of us are saints. Charlie Kirk’s personal beliefs have absolutely no validity in analyzing his unspeakable murder.

On the political front, President Trump believes dark money outfits are fueling violence. George Soros was named. Mr. Trump will direct the Justice Department to investigate these groups, which are extremely well-funded.

Finally, ever since the George Floyd riots, the Democratic Party and the leftist media that supports it have had a perception problem among Americans who are not ideological, which is most of the population.

That situation has now reached critical mass in America, with the far left very likely to be significantly marginalized.

So, that’s where we are.




 
Solid analysis:

As usual, the national press has essentially misreported a very important story: the nation’s reaction to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Utah authorities are providing the best factual accounting. Here are the most important points:

- The alleged killer, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, is not cooperating in the investigation.

- However, Robinson’s parents are giving information.

- Robinson’s live-in roommate, a person transitioning from male to female, is also speaking to investigators.

- Tyler Robinson apparently spent a lot of time on radical left social media hate sites. The Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox, calls them “dark corners of the internet.”

- Robinson will appear in court on Tuesday. He will most likely plead not guilty, although the evidence against him is overwhelming. His lawyers will probably go for the insanity defense.

As for a wider analysis, it breaks down along ideological lines. A number of far-left Americans are happy that Charlie Kirk was murdered. These are emotionally troubled people, some of whom are losing their jobs.

After Matthew Dowd was fired by MSNBC, the ardent left in the media quickly retreated. Paychecks usually trump ideology. On Fox News, Howard Kurtz said that Mr. Kirk “was not a saint.” That is a flat-out dumb statement. None of us are saints. Charlie Kirk’s personal beliefs have absolutely no validity in analyzing his unspeakable murder.

On the political front, President Trump believes dark money outfits are fueling violence. George Soros was named. Mr. Trump will direct the Justice Department to investigate these groups, which are extremely well-funded.

Finally, ever since the George Floyd riots, the Democratic Party and the leftist media that supports it have had a perception problem among Americans who are not ideological, which is most of the population.

That situation has now reached critical mass in America, with the far left very likely to be significantly marginalized.

So, that’s where we are.



What was misrepresented in the media?
 
As a true conservative I blame it on poor parenting. Parents these days fill their kids heads with total nonsense. With a family like his is it really any wonder how he turned out?


Tyler Robinson’s grandmother says their entire family are Republicans: ‘I don’t know a single Democrat’​

 
As a true conservative I blame it on poor parenting. Parents these days fill their kids heads with total nonsense. With a family like his is it really any wonder how he turned out?


Tyler Robinson’s grandmother says their entire family are Republicans: ‘I don’t know a single Democrat’​

I assume you have proof of his parent’s “poor parenting” and that they “filled their kids head with total nonsense”?
A family “like his”? Can you be more specific?
 
Are you comparing that to Kilmeand's call for euthanasia

Just asking
I see you are struggling yet again with my post. Address mine instead of your feeble attempt at deflection. By the way…you still are avoiding answer my question that I have asked many times.
Do you condone this political assassination, YES OR NO?
 
I see you are struggling yet again with my post. Address mine instead of your feeble attempt at deflection. By the way…you still are avoiding answer my question that I have asked many times.
Do you condone this political assassination, YES OR NO?
Like I said, I don't answer loaded questions that can be easily misconstrued by the experts of the right wing propaganda brigade.
 
I assume you have proof of his parent’s “poor parenting” and that they “filled their kids head with total nonsense”?
A family “like his”? Can you be more specific?

Clearly filling a kid's head with the kind of hateful and bigoted rhetoric that passes as republican intellectual truth these days is going to warp a young mind.

Growing up surrounded by this much hate directed towards your fellow Americans certainly had to desensitize the kid to violence against his fellow Americans.

Frankly I'm surprised that anyone did NAZI this coming.
 
Like I said, I don't answer loaded questions that can be easily misconstrued by the experts of the right wing propaganda brigade.
It isn’t a loaded question. You either condone the political assassination of Charlie Kirk or you don’t. Now if you are too afraid to step up and answer, that is totally on YOU.
But stop making excuses.
 
It isn’t a loaded question. You either condone the political assassination of Charlie Kirk or you don’t. Now if you are too afraid to step up and answer, that is totally on YOU.
But stop making excuses.
What do you think I condone?
 
Clearly filling a kid's head with the kind of hateful and bigoted rhetoric that passes as republican intellectual truth these days is going to warp a young mind.

Growing up surrounded by this much hate directed towards your fellow Americans certainly had to desensitize the kid to violence against his fellow Americans.

Frankly I'm surprised that anyone did NAZI this coming.
His parents did that? How? When?
Show me. I am open to you providing any evidence to back up your claim.
 
His parents did that? How? When?
Show me. I am open to you providing any evidence to back up your claim.

I don't provide you with any evidence that water is wet either. Some things are just self-evident. According to the grandmother there isn't a single Democrats in that kid's family. Of course he grew up surrounded by a bunch of hateful republican rhetoric. Growing up like that would warp to anyone. Do you NAZI that?
 
I don't provide you with any evidence that water is wet either. Some things are just self-evident. According to the grandmother there isn't a single Democrats in that kid's family. Of course he grew up surrounded by a bunch of hateful republican rhetoric. Growing up like that would warp to anyone. Do you NAZI that?
Wonderful! Thank you for sharing that you don’t have any actual proof to back up your claim.
Do I “nazi” that? Odd question. Can you be more specific as to what you are asking me?
 
Back
Top