Clapper Testifies

[Zam-Zam]

Same old same old:

James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Monday that he still has not seen any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals.


Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said on NBC that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. When asked if that is still accurate, Clapper said Monday, "it is."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/j...collusion-with-trump-campaign/article/2622452

So, there's that.......

 

[Sickofleft]

"it is."

Huh...go figure...

 

[Zam-Zam]

Huh...go figure...

Obviously, we must investigate further.......:>)

 

[Dawg]

Lindsey said she wants to see Trumps business deals..............she can't get over the fact Americans didn't want her to be nom

 

[Jen]

Same old same old:

James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Monday that he still has not seen any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals.


Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said on NBC that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. When asked if that is still accurate, Clapper said Monday, "it is."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/j...collusion-with-trump-campaign/article/2622452

So, there's that.......

Unfortunately Clapper doesn't mind lying under oath. Hey, if Bubba Clinton could do it, so can he.

 

[Spamature]

Same old same old:

James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Monday that he still has not seen any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals.


Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said on NBC that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. When asked if that is still accurate, Clapper said Monday, "it is."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/j...collusion-with-trump-campaign/article/2622452

So, there's that.......

And when they asked Sally Yates she said, that would require her to reveal classified information. Now the question you need to ask yourself is why didn't she say she had seen no evidence of collusion like Clapper ?

 

[Jen]

And when they asked Sally Yates she said, that would require her to reveal classified information. Now the question you need to ask yourself is why didn't she say she had seen no evidence of collusion like Clapper ?

Her goal was to imply that there had been collusion. With that answer she was able to do just that without a lie that may have come around to bite her.

 

[Dawg]

And when they asked Sally Yates she said, that would require her to reveal classified information. Now the question you need to ask yourself is why didn't she say she had seen no evidence of collusion like Clapper ?

is their a reason you're thread jacking? Yates is not the topic!

 

[Zam-Zam]

And when they asked Sally Yates she said, that would require her to reveal classified information. Now the question you need to ask yourself is why didn't she say she had seen no evidence of collusion like Clapper ?

She said was she couldn't answer. You are free to interpret that anyway you wish, but all we know for certain is she didn't answer. Clapper did.

 

[Spamature]

Her goal was to imply that there had been collusion. With that answer she was able to do just that without a lie that may have come around to bite her.

She was telling the senator that she's seen the FBI counterintelligence investigation evidence.

 

[Sickofleft]

And when they asked Sally Yates she said, that would require her to reveal classified information. Now the question you need to ask yourself is why didn't she say she had seen no evidence of collusion like Clapper ?

Politics.

Clapper is never going to run for office. Yates will eventually and will need to raise money and will do well with Democrats who love 1) Kept this ridiculous narrative alive for as long as possible 2) Was fired by Trump

 

[Spamature]

She said was she couldn't answer. You are free to interpret that anyway you wish, but all we know for certain is she didn't answer. Clapper did.

If she had not seen anything the answer would have been no like Clappers then.

Here you are accusing her of lying under oath.

 

[Sickofleft]

is their a reason you're thread jacking? Yates is not the topic!

Do you have to ask? Clappers testimony, Diane Fisenstein on CNN stating the same thing that she seen no evidence of collusion, all of them destroying the narrative.

 

[Spamature]

Politics.

Clapper is never going to run for office. Yates will eventually and will need to raise money and will do well with Democrats who love 1) Kept this ridiculous narrative alive for as long as possible 2) Was fired by Trump

And you think having told a lie told under oath hanging around her neck would help her with being elected to any office in the future ?

Everyone on Earth knew she her appointment was temporary and that she was not going to keep that position.

 

[as seen on tv]

this just in:

the new York times is preparing a front page story on how clapper once rented a porno from blockbuster. his credibility is shot!

 

[Spamature]

She said was she couldn't answer. You are free to interpret that anyway you wish, but all we know for certain is she didn't answer. Clapper did.

And you are free to ignore she could not just say no.

 

[Sickofleft]

And you think having told a lie told under oath hanging around her neck would help her with being elected to any office in the future ?

Everyone on Earth knew she her appointment was temporary and that she was not going to keep that position.

She is a smart political opportunist who chose essentially not to comment on a ongoing investigation. Lying would have been "Yes I have seen evidence of Russian collusion in the Trump campaign...." Which is exactly your problem because it does not exist because there was none.

 

[Sickofleft]

this just in:

the new York times is preparing a front page story on how clapper once rented a porno from blockbuster. his credibility is shot!

and returned it without rewinding!!!!!! BASTARD SHOULD HANG!!

 

[Spamature]

this just in:

the new York times is preparing a front page story on how clapper once rented a porno from blockbuster. his credibility is shot!

Jonathan Banks from Breaking Bad will play Clapper in the movie.

 

[Spamature]

She is a smart political opportunist who chose essentially not to comment on a ongoing investigation. Lying would have been "Yes I have seen evidence of Russian collusion in the Trump campaign...." Which is exactly your problem because it does not exist because there was none.

No that would have been talking about Classified intelligence. NO would have been the honest answer had she not seen anything.