New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

...cowards and their "right" to "open carry"...

Figjam

Mayor
...yes, cowards - in the US there is no need to "open carry" around town, at the mall or theater - period. Of course they know this which is why they feel so "manly" carrying an unloaded weapon. If one feels such an attachment to a gun and really wants to carry one where it's needed, please, man-up and take the first flight to Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Yemen - there you can carry your gun and will probably get the opportunity to use it.
 
Why the anti-civil rights stance? Do you believe people who exercise the other nine articles in the Bill of Rights to be "cowards" as well, or just this one?
 
...yes, cowards - in the US there is no need to "open carry" around town, at the mall or theater - period. Of course they know this which is why they feel so "manly" carrying an unloaded weapon. If one feels such an attachment to a gun and really wants to carry one where it's needed, please, man-up and take the first flight to Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Yemen - there you can carry your gun and will probably get the opportunity to use it.
That's a pretty shitty attitude Figjam; I expected better of you.
 
...no, carrying around an unloaded gun in a civil society is childish - there is no need for it and to say it is part of the second amendment is absurd.

Why the anti-civil rights stance? Do you believe people who exercise the other nine articles in the Bill of Rights to be "cowards" as well, or just this one?
 
...yes, cowards - in the US there is no need to "open carry" around town, at the mall or theater - period. Of course they know this which is why they feel so "manly" carrying an unloaded weapon. If one feels such an attachment to a gun and really wants to carry one where it's needed, please, man-up and take the first flight to Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Yemen - there you can carry your gun and will probably get the opportunity to use it.

Answer my question, please:

Let's pretend you're sitting in a restaurant with your spouse and children, enjoying your dinner. Suddenly, a maniac carrying a gun bursts in and starts shooting indiscriminately.

FORTUNATELY FOR YOU, another patron happens to be armed and kills the shooter before he has a chance to turn his attention to YOUR table, in effect saving your life and the life of your spouse and children.

Should you THANK him? Or will you CURSE him for carrying a gun?
 
...yes, cowards - in the US there is no need to "open carry" around town, at the mall or theater - period. Of course they know this which is why they feel so "manly" carrying an unloaded weapon. If one feels such an attachment to a gun and really wants to carry one where it's needed, please, man-up and take the first flight to Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Yemen - there you can carry your gun and will probably get the opportunity to use it.

BOO!








Ha, ha, ha.......

You DO amuse me, sport, I gotta give you that.....
 
...yes, cowards - in the US there is no need to "open carry" around town, at the mall or theater - period. Of course they know this which is why they feel so "manly" carrying an unloaded weapon. If one feels such an attachment to a gun and really wants to carry one where it's needed, please, man-up and take the first flight to Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Yemen - there you can carry your gun and will probably get the opportunity to use it.
You're a coward.

It is brave to go outside with an UNLOADED gun in this day and age and use it as a protest sign against an agenda to erase the second amendment from history. You're very likely to get beat and shot by law enforcement if not an armed and loaded liberal idiot.
 
...in an unlikely event such as you describe, one would hope that if an armed parton were able to act s/he would not inadvertently kill me or member of my family during the confusion that would ensue.

...in the "open carry" scenario what good does it do to have people hanging around with unloaded weapons? How does this help?

...IF - there were a restaurant full of patrons with loaded guns and someone tried what you describe - imagine all the collateral damage - do you really believe people would remain "calm" in this situation?

Answer my question, please:

Let's pretend you're sitting in a restaurant with your spouse and children, enjoying your dinner. Suddenly, a maniac carrying a gun bursts in and starts shooting indiscriminately.

FORTUNATELY FOR YOU, another patron happens to be armed and kills the shooter before he has a chance to turn his attention to YOUR table, in effect saving your life and the life of your spouse and children.

Should you THANK him? Or will you CURSE him for carrying a gun?
 
...brave? It's stupid - when I was a kid I would play "Combat" - there is no need for adults to parade around with unloaded guns. As I said, you want to be a real man - go where they have guns - loaded guns...

You're a coward.

It is brave to go outside with an UNLOADED gun in this day and age and use it as a protest sign against an agenda to erase the second amendment from history. You're very likely to get beat and shot by law enforcement if not an armed and loaded liberal idiot.
 
...in the Middle East, there are no shortages of guns - it seems that would be your nirvana...

Your ethos are what brings us to the Middle East. The Middle East (the rest of the World) does not have a second amendment and look how the majority of them have turned out.
 
...brave? It's stupid - when I was a kid I would play "Combat" - there is no need for adults to parade around with unloaded guns. As I said, you want to be a real man - go where they have guns - loaded guns...
I never thought I'd meet a man afraid of protest signs.
 
...in an unlikely event such as you describe, one would hope that if an armed parton were able to act s/he would not inadvertently kill me or member of my family during the confusion that would ensue.

...in the "open carry" scenario what good does it do to have people hanging around with unloaded weapons? How does this help?

...IF - there were a restaurant full of patrons with loaded guns and someone tried what you describe - imagine all the collateral damage - do you really believe people would remain "calm" in this situation?

So you think it would be better to just let the shooter carry on, and kill as many as possible, until, 10 long minutes later, the police arrive?

Ok then...

Oh, and PS: If the scenario I describe is soooo "unlikely", what's all this screeching about gun laws and gun nuts and open carry etc? I mean, if it hardly ever happens, why are we having this conversation, ad nauseum?
 
Answer my question, please:

Let's pretend you're sitting in a restaurant with your spouse and children, enjoying your dinner. Suddenly, a maniac carrying a gun bursts in and starts shooting indiscriminately.

FORTUNATELY FOR YOU, another patron happens to be armed and kills the shooter before he has a chance to turn his attention to YOUR table, in effect saving your life and the life of your spouse and children.

Should you THANK him? Or will you CURSE him for carrying a gun?
I would rather the maniac wouldn't have so easily gotten the gun.
 
...in an unlikely event such as you describe, one would hope that if an armed parton were able to act s/he would not inadvertently kill me or member of my family during the confusion that would ensue.

...in the "open carry" scenario what good does it do to have people hanging around with unloaded weapons? How does this help?

...IF - there were a restaurant full of patrons with loaded guns and someone tried what you describe - imagine all the collateral damage - do you really believe people would remain "calm" in this situation?
How can a few folks shooting back possibly be any worse than everyone being systematically slaughtered? Are you serious? o_O
 
Back
Top