New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Crackers, indeed

trapdoor

Governor
In the NYT story here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/business/animal-crackers-barnums-nabisco-mondelez.html

We find that the PETA has prevailed to have the cage-bars removed from the animal cracker's box. This, I presume is to allow the illustrations to roam free where the zebra, elephant, giraffe and gorilla must immediately free the lion (which despite PETA's pleading remains profoundly non-vegan in the wild).

It's a small thing, but how can the left prevail in the long term when it keeps assailing such iconic, and harmless, images as the "circus rail car" that has adorned the animal cracker's box since before almost anyone alive can remember?

Of course, the recipe for animal crackers is itself exploitive of animals, containing eggs, and milk. So PETA's desires, of course, are not merely that the bars be removed but that you not eat animal crackers at all.

Personally, I never much cared for animal crackers, but this sort of pedantry on the part of animal rights nuts is sufficient to replace animal crackers in my life -- I'm fully able to see that there are plenty of people in society who have GONE crackers.
 
In the NYT story here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/business/animal-crackers-barnums-nabisco-mondelez.html

We find that the PETA has prevailed to have the cage-bars removed from the animal cracker's box. This, I presume is to allow the illustrations to roam free where the zebra, elephant, giraffe and gorilla must immediately free the lion (which despite PETA's pleading remains profoundly non-vegan in the wild).

It's a small thing, but how can the left prevail in the long term when it keeps assailing such iconic, and harmless, images as the "circus rail car" that has adorned the animal cracker's box since before almost anyone alive can remember?

Of course, the recipe for animal crackers is itself exploitive of animals, containing eggs, and milk. So PETA's desires, of course, are not merely that the bars be removed but that you not eat animal crackers at all.

Personally, I never much cared for animal crackers, but this sort of pedantry on the part of animal rights nuts is sufficient to replace animal crackers in my life -- I'm fully able to see that there are plenty of people in society who have GONE crackers.

I'm all for protecting animals, and heavily penalize cruelty to any of them. I actually walk around earth worms or crickets, so as not to kill them LOL. That said...

PETA’s 2010 donations totaled $33 million ($35 million if you add on merchandise sales and other revenue). So where did your money go last year? According to PETA’s 2010 annual report:

  • “A vegans make better lovers” campaign where PETA campaigners publicly made out on a bed on the streets of Nashville, TN.
  • Disruption of the Westminster dog show (Because animal lovers deserve to be targeted?)
  • A campaign comparing pregnant women to fattened sows to protest farmed meat
  • Dressing as a giant vanilla condom promote animal birth control in Beirut (Because Beirut has few other controversies to deal with currently)
  • PETA also says it has given over $843 thousand in grants to researchers looking at animal alternatives. Sounds good right? But one should do the math here. The amount is 2 percent of the money PETA spent last year. In comparison, they spent 17 percent of their money (your money) on fundraising to raise more money. In addition, research is expensive (sad but true)… An $800,000 split among several researchers as PETA has done…will not go far at all.

PETA’s questionable anti-farmed meat stunt
Other notable PETA investments in the past:

https://speakingofresearch.com/2011/01/18/where-do-petas-donation-dollars-go/
 
1) According to government documents, PETA employees have killed more than 19,200 dogs, cats, puppies, and kittens since 1998. This behavior continues despite PETA’s moralizing about the “unethical” treatment of animals by farmers, scientists, restaurant owners, circuses, hunters, fishermen, zookeepers, and countless other Americans. PETA puts to death over 90 percent of the animals it accepts from members of the public who expect the group to make a reasonable attempt to find them adoptive homes. PETA holds absolutely no open-adoption shelter hours at its Norfolk, VA headquarters, choosing instead to spend part of its $32 million annual income on a contract with a crematory service to periodically empty hundreds of animal bodies from its large walk-in freezer.

2) PETA president and co-founder Ingrid Newkirk has described her group’s overall goal as “total animal liberation.” This means the complete abolition of meat, milk, cheese, eggs, honey, zoos, aquariums, circuses, wool, leather, fur, silk, hunting, fishing, and pet ownership. In a 2003 profile of Newkirk in The New Yorker, author Michael Specter wrote that Newkirk has had at least one seeing-eye dog taken away from its blind owner. PETA is also against all medical research that requires the use of animals, including research aimed at curing AIDS and cancer.

3) PETA has given tens of thousands of dollars to convicted arsonists and other violent criminals. This includes a 2001 donation of $1,500 to the North American Earth Liberation Front (ELF), an FBI-certified “domestic terrorist” group responsible for dozens of firebombs and death threats. During the 1990s, PETA paid $70,200 to Rodney Coronado, an Animal Liberation Front (ALF) serial arsonist convicted of burning down a Michigan State University research laboratory. In his sentencing memorandum, a federal prosecutor implicated PETA president Ingrid Newkirk in that crime. PETA vegetarian campaign coordinator Bruce Friedrich has also told an animal rights convention that “blowing stuff up and smashing windows” is “a great way to bring about animal liberation,” adding, “Hallelujah to the people who are willing to do it.”

4) PETA activists regularly target children as young as six years old with anti-meat and anti-milk propaganda, even waiting outside their schools to intercept them without notifying their parents. One piece of kid-targeted PETA literature tells small children: “Your Mommy Kills Animals!” PETA brags that its messages reach over 1.2 million minor children, including 30,000 kids between the ages of 6 and 12, all contacted by e-mail without parental supervision. One PETA vice president told the Fox News Channel’s audience: “Our campaigns are always geared towards children, and they always will be.”

5) PETA’s president has said that “even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, we would be against it.” And PETA has repeatedly attacked research foundations like the March of Dimes, the Pediatric AIDS Foundation, and the American Cancer Society, solely because they support animal-based research aimed at curing life-threatening diseases and birth defects. And PETA helped to start and manage a quasi-medical front group, the misnamed Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, to attack medical research head-on.

6) PETA has compared Jewish victims of the Nazi Holocaust to farm animals and Jesus Christ to pigs. PETA’s religious campaigns include a website that claims—despite ample evidence to the contrary—that Jesus Christ was a vegetarian. PETA holds protests at houses of worship, even suing one church that tried to protect its members from Sunday-morning harassment. Its billboards taunt Christians with the message that hogs “died for their sins.” PETA insists, contrary to centuries of rabbinical teaching, that the Jewish ritual of kosher slaughter shouldn’t be allowed. And its infamous “Holocaust on Your Plate” campaign crassly compared the Jewish victims of Nazi genocide to farm animals.

7) PETA frequently looks the other way when its celebrity spokespersons don’t practice what it preaches. As gossip bloggers and Hollywood journalists have noted, Pamela Anderson’s Dodge Viper (auctioned to benefit PETA) had a “luxurious leather interior”; Jenna Jameson was photographed fishing, slurping oysters, and wearing a leather jacket just weeks after launching an anti-leather campaign for PETA; Morrissey got an official “okay” from PETA after eating at a steakhouse; Dita von Teese has written about her love of furs and foie gras; Steve-O built a career out of abusing small animals on film; the officially “anti-fur” Eva Mendes often wears fur anyway; and Charlize Theron’s celebrated October 2007 Vogue cover shoot featured several suede garments. In 2008, “Baby Phat” designer Kimora Lee Simmons became a PETA spokesmodel despite working with fur and leather, after making a $20,000 donation to the animal rights group.

https://www.consumerfreedom.com/articles/134-7-things-you-didnt-know-about-peta/
 
By yapping about the box design for Animal Crackers?

That’s the best you people can do?

;-)

Give 'em a break. It is really hard to change the subject from Trump's circle of friends going to jail for corruption to something to criticize someone else for that really falls under the category of free speech.
 
I see you’re focused on the really important stories of the day. Like the box design for Animal Crackers.

;-)

I should have focused on the illegal immigrant who killed Mollie Tibbetts? The Manafort conviction (doesn't touch Trump)? The Cohen plea bargain (touches Trump, but won't take him out of office)? I tend to focus on stupidity, but I suppose I should let you discuss that as your more of an expert.
 
I should have focused on the illegal immigrant who killed Mollie Tibbetts? The Manafort conviction (doesn't touch Trump)? The Cohen plea bargain (touches Trump, but won't take him out of office)? I tend to focus on stupidity, but I suppose I should let you discuss that as your more of an expert.

I did surf through Fox Noise and, while legit media were covering yesterday’s blockbuster convictions of Trump’s toadies, they were blathering on about the Tibbets case. The perfect diversion story for the Fox Noise crowd.

May I suggest to you that the Tibbets matter is a better diversion story than the Animal Crackers box design?

Have some pride, man!

;-)
 
I did surf through Fox Noise and, while legit media were covering yesterday’s blockbuster convictions of Trump’s toadies, they were blathering on about the Tibbets case. The perfect diversion story for the Fox Noise crowd.

May I suggest to you that the Tibbets matter is a better diversion story than the Animal Crackers box design?

Have some pride, man!

;-)

I honestly have almost no idea what Fox has on its coverage. I only know about it from two sources: 1) Slate magazine had coverage of the Tibbetts murder, but devoted its last three grafs to the fact that Fox covered the murder above the Manfort and Cohen sentences; and 2) That great commentator known to the world as "Bugsy McGurk."

Personally I don't watch Fox. But I find PETA annoying and found that piece interesting enough to comment about.
 
Back
Top