New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Dammit!

Can't wait to hear what the stinking NRA has to say on this. Maybe they'll blame liberals too as that is about the most vacant excuse one can use.

Somebody could blow up a classroom with a rocket-propelled grenade and the NRA would say "If the teacher or kids had had a bazooka, maybe this wouldn't have happened!"
 
Jack it is about the mental breakdown of a segment of gun toting society that gives excuses like you just did. I don't have an answer I am just waiting for the tears to stop. I don't really care that guns don't kill, people do nor do I care that it is the other side. I am just caring right now for a classroom filled with kindergarten children nearing Christmas in their first year in school so you see, I don't give a crap what anyone thinks. This one won't be washed away with cliche.
 
Sick to think anybody, would "thank their lucky stars" over this.....

Yeah, well watch the Lib Media jump on this like ugly on an ape; and make a gun control case out of it. Rahm Emanuel said, never let a good crisis go to waste. Libs won't let this tragedy go to waste.
 
Sick to think anybody, would "thank their lucky stars" over this.....

Well it wasnt HIS grandson and obviously that's all that matters. When I just logged on here after watching this on TV for a long time, I had hoped that there wouldn't be anyone defnding the RIGHT TO KILL. Sick bastards.
 
While displaying an avatar of himself with HIS grandson, he's obviously WORRIED about the fricken GUNS.
He makes me sick to my stomach.

I'm not worried about law-abiding citizens having guns. Nutcases like this shooter obviously should not have had them. We'll have to wait and see if he acquired them legally or not. I'll be surprised if he did.
 
Seriously....can this be voted Hypocrisy of the Year here?


Jack claims "liberals" will use this for political purposes....when IN HIS OWN TOP POST he tries to use it for political purpsoes against liberals?!?!?!?!?
 
Huh?! It is the Republicans who celebrate radical individualism and have elevated it to the status of a religious belief. Ayn Rand, for example. You guys certainly are funny: You've spent most of the past year accusing Democrats of being 'collectivists', and now you turn around and accuse of us being in favor of 'individualism'. Make up your minds!!

JD's contradictory comment there just left me amazed.


I mean...really???

the individual is of ultimate importance; that no one is responsible for his actions. Responsibility and self-control is ridiculed and mocked and the moral failings of an individual are
...


Does this even begin to make sense?
 
More than likely they were High powered legally acquired weapons....Weapons that should never have been made legal...The shooter was insane...Laxed gun laws made his insanity all the more deadly....now dozens are killed
 
I'm not worried about law-abiding citizens having guns. Nutcases like this shooter obviously should not have had them. We'll have to wait and see if he acquired them legally or not. I'll be surprised if he did.

Most mass shooters obtain their guns legally Jack. Nobody wants to outlaw guns. The waiting period needs to be longer with more thorough background checks (criminal AND mental histories).

And expanded clips/ assault weapons with no hunting or self-defense application have GOT to go.
 
Somebody could blow up a classroom with a rocket-propelled grenade and the NRA would say "If the teacher or kids had had a bazooka, maybe this wouldn't have happened!"

Wayne LaPierre will start an initiative for all kindergartners to carry bazookas and/or shoulder launched rockets.
 
Those who favor tougher background checks and banning guns which have no hunting or self defense applications are responsible for gun violence???

How you figure?

"self defense applications"


All guns, by definition, have self defense applications.
 
Wayne LaPierre will start an initiative for all kindergartners to carry bazookas and/or shoulder launched rockets.

That's the logical response....given their previous apologia, isn't it? It's always somebody shoots up a bunch of people with a semi-automatic rifle and the NRA says it could have been "prevented" or "not as bad" if the victims had been similarly armed....

take it to the next logical step. Somebody uses a flame-thrower to kill 30 people in a restaurant, the NRA would HAVE to say "It could have been stopped if EVERYBODY was carrying a flame-thrower".

((BTW, before our NRA fans say something about the legality of owning a flame-thrower....look it up....it's LEGAL.))
 
"self defense applications"


All guns, by definition, have self defense applications.

Semantical quibbling my friend. Shoulder fired rockets might have self defense application as well, but it is overkill.

Extended magazines such as this have no REASONABLE self defense application, and he had two pistols likely very much like this one and probably a few extra clips.

awww.glockforum.com_images_1_0_8_9_6_thumb2_extended_32.jpg
 
BTW, go to the Wikipedia article on School Shootings....and see how the HISTORY matchs up with Jack's theory on "liberals destroying moral fibre".

More b.s.
 
Back
Top