December 8, 1941 – Honolulu Mayor says “Don’t be alarmed at increased police activity”

[as seen on tv]

http://www.snopes.com/2017/06/04/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-no-reason-to-be-alarmed-trump/


Oops, my bad. THAT never happened. Here’s what actually took place: the (non) wrath of Khan, London's muslim mayor.

Hot on the heels of the latest ISIS slaughter in London, Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan issued a press release to residents, telling them there’s “No reason to be alarmed at the increased police presence”.

Stop laughing. He really did say that. And it's not funny, despite what Bugsy and others have posted on this board.

What else did Khan have to say? I searched in vain for the following, but found zilch. Perhaps you’ll have better luck?

• There was no call for London moques to cooperate with police when their members exhibit radicalized/jihadist behavior or social media postings
  
  
• No advice for residents or tourists to exercise caution when attending concerns, walking on public streets, or gathering in a public place.
  
  
• No blanket condemnation of terrorism in general, or ISIS in particular

• Just this: "Don't be afraid of the police"

Perhaps thegovernment of PM Theresa May offered better advice, or took more helpful action? Um . .. no.

May's government did not launch any retaliatory air attacks against the target rich environment of ISIS training camps in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. This would be like the Mayor of Honolulu and FDR urging Pearl Harbor survivors to be patient, and not bristle at any short term "stop and frisk" tactics while they try to figure out the politically correct, poll driven response.

Radical muslims must be totally convinced that Allah is invincible, and the west will soon be defeated, no? Moderate ones too, probably. No wonder "moderate muslims" don't denounce ISIS. They're afraid of appearing on a kill list after ISIS wins . ..

Last year, when the Brexit vote turned out to be “yes”, there were dire predictions (by leftists) that London would soon lose its place as the pre-eminent financial capital of Europe. That didn't happen, of course.

However, a terrorist bombing at the Lloyds building, in the heart of London’s financial district, could have a “disparate impact” on major banks’ decision to stay or go.

Perhaps that’s where Mayor Khan is planning to deploy his additional squads of unarmed bobbies? Its clear that he - and other authorities - have done an awful job of protecting concert goers, tourists, and sightseers.

 

[Sickofleft]

http://www.snopes.com/2017/06/04/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-no-reason-to-be-alarmed-trump/


Oops, my bad. THAT never happened. Here’s what actually took place: the (non) wrath of Khan, London's muslim mayor.

Hot on the heels of the latest ISIS slaughter in London, Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan issued a press release to residents, telling them there’s “No reason to be alarmed at the increased police presence”.

Stop laughing. He really did say that. And it's not funny, despite what Bugsy and others have posted on this board.

What else did Khan have to say? I searched in vain for the following, but found zilch. Perhaps you’ll have better luck?

• There was no call for London moques to cooperate with police when their members exhibit radicalized/jihadist behavior or social media postings
  
  
• No advice for residents or tourists to exercise caution when attending concerns, walking on public streets, or gathering in a public place.
  
  
• No blanket condemnation of terrorism in general, or ISIS in particular

• Just this: "Don't be afraid of the police"

Perhaps thegovernment of PM Theresa May offered better advice, or took more helpful action? Um . .. no.

May's government did not launch any retaliatory air attacks against the target rich environment of ISIS training camps in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. This would be like the Mayor of Honolulu and FDR urging Pearl Harbor survivors to be patient, and not bristle at any short term "stop and frisk" tactics while they try to figure out the politically correct, poll driven response.

Radical muslims must be totally convinced that Allah is invincible, and the west will soon be defeated, no? Moderate ones too, probably. No wonder "moderate muslims" don't denounce ISIS. They're afraid of appearing on a kill list after ISIS wins . ..

Last year, when the Brexit vote turned out to be “yes”, there were dire predictions (by leftists) that London would soon lose its place as the pre-eminent financial capital of Europe. That didn't happen, of course.

However, a terrorist bombing at the Lloyds building, in the heart of London’s financial district, could have a “disparate impact” on major banks’ decision to stay or go.

Perhaps that’s where Mayor Khan is planning to deploy his additional squads of unarmed bobbies? Its clear that he - and other authorities - have done an awful job of protecting concert goers, tourists, and sightseers.

Regardless of who wins the election in the UK nothing is going to change. It will be the same empty platitudes "Terror will not divide us" or some equally pointless rhetoric.

Apparently no reason to be alarmed when some 23yr old kid, uses his student loans to go and fight for ISIS and then come back and be allowed to just walk around the UK as any other citizen. Good news UK citizens you paid for this attack with your own tax dollars!

No reason for anyone who goes and fights for ISIS to still have a passport.

It's insane and it's only going to get worse as the western world once again responds to a Islamic terrorist act with "Well now lets be careful we don't want to upset the Muslims by talking about what a huge [Unwelcome language removed] problem their religion is" I am sure another concert solved all of that anyway...

The Mayor of London should no longer be the Mayor of London.

 

[middleview]

http://www.snopes.com/2017/06/04/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-no-reason-to-be-alarmed-trump/


Oops, my bad. THAT never happened. Here’s what actually took place: the (non) wrath of Khan, London's muslim mayor.

Hot on the heels of the latest ISIS slaughter in London, Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan issued a press release to residents, telling them there’s “No reason to be alarmed at the increased police presence”.

Stop laughing. He really did say that. And it's not funny, despite what Bugsy and others have posted on this board.

What else did Khan have to say? I searched in vain for the following, but found zilch. Perhaps you’ll have better luck?

• There was no call for London moques to cooperate with police when their members exhibit radicalized/jihadist behavior or social media postings
  
  
• No advice for residents or tourists to exercise caution when attending concerns, walking on public streets, or gathering in a public place.
  
  
• No blanket condemnation of terrorism in general, or ISIS in particular

• Just this: "Don't be afraid of the police"

Perhaps thegovernment of PM Theresa May offered better advice, or took more helpful action? Um . .. no.

May's government did not launch any retaliatory air attacks against the target rich environment of ISIS training camps in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. This would be like the Mayor of Honolulu and FDR urging Pearl Harbor survivors to be patient, and not bristle at any short term "stop and frisk" tactics while they try to figure out the politically correct, poll driven response.

Radical muslims must be totally convinced that Allah is invincible, and the west will soon be defeated, no? Moderate ones too, probably. No wonder "moderate muslims" don't denounce ISIS. They're afraid of appearing on a kill list after ISIS wins . ..

Last year, when the Brexit vote turned out to be “yes”, there were dire predictions (by leftists) that London would soon lose its place as the pre-eminent financial capital of Europe. That didn't happen, of course.

However, a terrorist bombing at the Lloyds building, in the heart of London’s financial district, could have a “disparate impact” on major banks’ decision to stay or go.

Perhaps that’s where Mayor Khan is planning to deploy his additional squads of unarmed bobbies? Its clear that he - and other authorities - have done an awful job of protecting concert goers, tourists, and sightseers.

At least three of the Muslims attempting to enforce the Shariah zone in east London have gone to jail, one for 17 months. Just thought you'd like to know.

 

[Arkady]

http://www.snopes.com/2017/06/04/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-no-reason-to-be-alarmed-trump/


Oops, my bad. THAT never happened. Here’s what actually took place: the (non) wrath of Khan, London's muslim mayor.

Hot on the heels of the latest ISIS slaughter in London, Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan issued a press release to residents, telling them there’s “No reason to be alarmed at the increased police presence”.

Stop laughing. He really did say that. And it's not funny, despite what Bugsy and others have posted on this board.

What else did Khan have to say? I searched in vain for the following, but found zilch. Perhaps you’ll have better luck?

• There was no call for London moques to cooperate with police when their members exhibit radicalized/jihadist behavior or social media postings
  
  
• No advice for residents or tourists to exercise caution when attending concerns, walking on public streets, or gathering in a public place.
  
  
• No blanket condemnation of terrorism in general, or ISIS in particular

• Just this: "Don't be afraid of the police"

Perhaps thegovernment of PM Theresa May offered better advice, or took more helpful action? Um . .. no.

May's government did not launch any retaliatory air attacks against the target rich environment of ISIS training camps in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. This would be like the Mayor of Honolulu and FDR urging Pearl Harbor survivors to be patient, and not bristle at any short term "stop and frisk" tactics while they try to figure out the politically correct, poll driven response.

Radical muslims must be totally convinced that Allah is invincible, and the west will soon be defeated, no? Moderate ones too, probably. No wonder "moderate muslims" don't denounce ISIS. They're afraid of appearing on a kill list after ISIS wins . ..

Last year, when the Brexit vote turned out to be “yes”, there were dire predictions (by leftists) that London would soon lose its place as the pre-eminent financial capital of Europe. That didn't happen, of course.

However, a terrorist bombing at the Lloyds building, in the heart of London’s financial district, could have a “disparate impact” on major banks’ decision to stay or go.

Perhaps that’s where Mayor Khan is planning to deploy his additional squads of unarmed bobbies? Its clear that he - and other authorities - have done an awful job of protecting concert goers, tourists, and sightseers.

Let me guess: you're relying on Donald Trump's tweets to tell you what Khan said, rather than listening to the comments first hand.

Anyway, I hope we see more calm responses by leaders in the face of terrorist attacks. The whole point of terrorism is to provoke a panic, so that the extremists can have an impact far beyond their abilities to cause direct harm. It's a shame when politicians like Trump transform themselves into allies of the terrorists, by reading their assigned lines in that twisted little script. The more our leaders work to amplify the panic for their own political benefit, the more incentive there is for terrorists to continue with the strategy.

 

[worldlymrb]

Muslims attack in the name of Allah and lefty blames everybody/everything but Islam.

 

[as seen on tv]

Regardless of who wins the election in the UK nothing is going to change. It will be the same empty platitudes "Terror will not divide us" or some equally pointless rhetoric.

Apparently no reason to be alarmed when some 23yr old kid, uses his student loans to go and fight for ISIS and then come back and be allowed to just walk around the UK as any other citizen. Good news UK citizens you paid for this attack with your own tax dollars!

No reason for anyone who goes and fights for ISIS to still have a passport.

It's insane and it's only going to get worse as the western world once again responds to a Islamic terrorist act with "Well now lets be careful we don't want to upset the Muslims by talking about what a huge [Unwelcome language removed] problem their religion is" I am sure another concert solved all of that anyway...

The Mayor of London should no longer be the Mayor of London.

Theresa May is no Margaret Thatcher. She has no credentials or aptitude for fighting this sort of battle.

 

[as seen on tv]

Let me guess: you're relying on Donald Trump's tweets to tell you what Khan said, rather than listening to the comments first hand.

Anyway, I hope we see more calm responses by leaders in the face of terrorist attacks. The whole point of terrorism is to provoke a panic, so that the extremists can have an impact far beyond their abilities to cause direct harm. It's a shame when politicians like Trump transform themselves into allies of the terrorists, by reading their assigned lines in that twisted little script. The more our leaders work to amplify the panic for their own political benefit, the more incentive there is for terrorists to continue with the strategy.

you are incredibly dumb, and don't read posts.

my link contained the full text of Khan's statement. I didn't mention Trump at all.

how can you be so efffing stupid? how do you even find your car keys in the morning.

I give up. you aren't worth even replying to, since you don't read and don't understand.

 

[as seen on tv]

At least three of the Muslims attempting to enforce the Shariah zone in east London have gone to jail, one for 17 months. Just thought you'd like to know.

what was their crime?

 

[middleview]

what was their crime?

The guy who got 17 months was convicted of assault because he punched a guy, the others were convicted of "affray"...and got 6 months. Sounds like they were shouting and threatening a couple for holding hands and a woman for the way she was dressed.

 

[Arkady]

Muslims attack in the name of Allah and lefty blames everybody/everything but Islam.

When Christians attack in the name of Christ, should we blame Christianity?

 

[Arkady]

you are incredibly dumb, and don't read posts.

I read your post. That's what led me to believe you're doing what you nearly always do: mindlessly parroting Donald Trump. Since I get my news from the actual news, not from Trump's Twitter feed, I'm well aware of what Khan said, which obviously was not confined to the bit about counseling people not to be alarmed by the increased police presence. For example, I'm aware that he said "We will never let these cowards win and we will never be cowed by terrorism." I am aware that he said "There aren’t words to describe the grief and anger that our city will be feeling today. I am appalled and furious that these cowardly terrorists would deliberately target innocent Londoners and bystanders enjoying their Saturday night. There can be no justification for the acts of these terrorists and I’m quite clear, we will never let them win, nor will we allow them to cower our city or Londoners." But if you get your news from Trump's Twitter feed, that's probably all news to you. If you're the kind of imbecile whose world begins and ends at whatever Donald Trump has to say, you could search forever and find "zilch" from Khan other than the line about the police presence. Your'e a victim of self-imprisonment in the conservative echo chamber. Have the courage to step outside of that. There's a great big world out here.

http://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-40149117/london-attack-grief-and-anger-sadiq-khan

 

[middleview]

I read your post. That's what led me to believe you're doing what you nearly always do: mindlessly parroting Donald Trump. Since I get my news from the actual news, not from Trump's Twitter feed, I'm well aware of what Khan said, which obviously was not confined to the bit about not being alarmed by the increased police presence. For example, I'm aware that he said "We will never let these cowards win and we will never be cowed by terrorism." I am aware that he said "There aren’t words to describe the grief and anger that our city will be feeling today. I am appalled and furious that these cowardly terrorists would deliberately target innocent Londoners and bystanders enjoying their Saturday night. There can be no justification for the acts of these terrorists and I’m quite clear, we will never let them win, nor will we allow them to cower our city or Londoners." But if you get your news from Trump's Twitter feed, that's probably all news to you. If you're the kind of imbecile whose world begins and ends at whatever Donald Trump has to say, you could search forever and find "zilch" from Khan other than the line about the police presence. Your'e a victim of self-imprisonment in the conservative echo chamber. Have the courage to step outside of that. There's a great big world out here.

http://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-40149117/london-attack-grief-and-anger-sadiq-khan

If he'd told Londoners to just go shopping, as per George W. after 911...that would have been ok.

 

[as seen on tv]

I read your post. That's what led me to believe you're doing what you nearly always do: mindlessly parroting Donald Trump. Since I get my news from the actual news, not from Trump's Twitter feed, I'm well aware of what Khan said, which obviously was not confined to the bit about counseling people not to be alarmed by the increased police presence. For example, I'm aware that he said "We will never let these cowards win and we will never be cowed by terrorism." I am aware that he said "There aren’t words to describe the grief and anger that our city will be feeling today. I am appalled and furious that these cowardly terrorists would deliberately target innocent Londoners and bystanders enjoying their Saturday night. There can be no justification for the acts of these terrorists and I’m quite clear, we will never let them win, nor will we allow them to cower our city or Londoners." But if you get your news from Trump's Twitter feed, that's probably all news to you. If you're the kind of imbecile whose world begins and ends at whatever Donald Trump has to say, you could search forever and find "zilch" from Khan other than the line about the police presence. Your'e a victim of self-imprisonment in the conservative echo chamber. Have the courage to step outside of that. There's a great big world out here.

http://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-40149117/london-attack-grief-and-anger-sadiq-khan

nice attempt to evade. you've been outed as ignorant, and not bothering to read the actual post.

I NEVER mentioned trump.

I DID include - and address - the full khan quote

You lack any semblance of honor. You continue to try and lie your way out of the situation.

You're pathetic. Apologize and move on. Or be like Kathy Griffin.

 

[as seen on tv]

If he'd told Londoners to just go shopping, as per George W. after 911...that would have been ok.

there's nothing wrong with telling brits to "keep calm and carry on". that's their traditional approach.

but Khan's ONLY message was "don't be alarmed at more police".

as if he police were the cause of any of this.

Khan has it 100% wrong.

 

[as seen on tv]

The guy who got 17 months was convicted of assault because he punched a guy, the others were convicted of "affray"...and got 6 months. Sounds like they were shouting and threatening a couple for holding hands and a woman for the way she was dressed.

I don't know what "affray" is.

that said, if (in Baltimore) you punch someone, you don't serve time. You're released on personal recognizance awaiting trial (no cash bail). at trial the judge suspends sentence and there is no time in jail. you might get "parole" followup if you had a prior.

I'm guessing Mr. Sharia (in the photo) must have had a string of priors/felonies, if he wound up with more than a year in "reading gaol" for punching someone.

 

[as seen on tv]

When Christians attack in the name of Christ, should we blame Christianity?

we should blame the church/pastor/bishop they are associated with, and who inspired them.

if the Jesuits had a site calling for extermination of all other faiths, it wouldn't be tolerated.

we should permanently close any US mosques where members engage in terrorist activities.

 

[middleview]

I don't know what "affray" is.

that said, if (in Baltimore) you punch someone, you don't serve time. You're released on personal recognizance awaiting trial (no cash bail). at trial the judge suspends sentence and there is no time in jail. you might get "parole" followup if you had a prior.

I'm guessing Mr. Sharia (in the photo) must have had a string of priors/felonies, if he wound up with more than a year in "reading gaol" for punching someone.

A group of vigilantes calling themselves "Muslim patrols" patrolled the streets in East London from 2013 to 2014. The individuals were young Sunni Muslim men, members of an organisation that called itself the "Shariah Project".[1] Early in 2013, videos of their activities, filmed by members of the patrol, were uploaded online:[2] these showed hooded members confronting passers-by and demanding that they behave in an Islamic way.[3] They targeted prostitutes, people drinking alcohol, couples who were holding hands, women whom they considered to be dressed immodestly, and harassed others whom they perceived as being gay.[4][5][6] Five men were arrested in January 2013 as part of an investigation into the gang.[7] In December 2013, three of them plead guilty to affray, and were subsequently given jail sentences.[8]

The Muslim East London Mosque community condemned the patrols as "utterly unacceptable" [9] In response to the 'Muslim Patrols', the far-right organisation Britain First has established 'Christian Patrols'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia_patrols

 

[Arkady]

nice attempt to evade.

I didn't evade. I pointed out your error. You said "my link contained the full text of Khan's statement," which you imagined was confined to just "No reason to be alarmed at the increased police presence." That dutifully parrots the little bit of Khan's statement that Donald Trump highlighted for the Twits of the Twitterverse. But it's clearly not "the full text of Khan's statement." It came from a longer interview with the BBC, which those of us who get our news from actual news sources, rather than Trump's Twitter feed, were aware of. Other portions of his comments were well-covered by the BBC, CBS, NBC, the Atlantic, and other places grown-ups get their news, and you can see BBC posted about a minute of his comments as video. But for those of you who get your news from the conservative captive media, the bit about the police presence looked like the "full text." That's why you're a joke. I'd ask you to apologize for lying to the group about that being the "full text," but we both know you lack the honor for that.

 

[middleview]

we should blame the church/pastor/bishop they are associated with, and who inspired them.

if the Jesuits had a site calling for extermination of all other faiths, it wouldn't be tolerated.

we should permanently close any US mosques where members engage in terrorist activities.

don't let the constitution get in your way....

 

[Craig]

we should blame the church/pastor/bishop they are associated with, and who inspired them.

if the Jesuits had a site calling for extermination of all other faiths, it wouldn't be tolerated.

we should permanently close any US mosques where members engage in terrorist activities.

“Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age" (Matthew 28:19-20).

Extermination by proselytizing. Accepted.