Mick
The Right is always right
https://www.foxnews.com/media/van-drew-reveals-reason-for-voting-against-impeachment
Snippets from the article:
"We have to understand, impeachment is something that's supposed to be exceptionally unusual. It is supposed to be bipartisan. It is supposed to be fair," Van Drew said
This has nothing to do with whether you like Donald Trump, or don't like him, or want to see him have a second term or win in an election. This has to do with the institution of impeachment itself and not misusing it," he argued.
"You know, De Tocqueville in 1853 wrote that if a nation was more and more often using...impeachment as a way of actually removing its leaders, it would show the deterioration of the nation," Van Drew said.
"It is so rarely used, should be rarely used. And as I've mentioned to you before, it is something that during the hundreds of years of American history has never been successfully used," he added.
Comparing the impeachment of a president to "more like something you would see in Europe or third-world nations," Van Drew encouraged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to shift her focus to "real issues" for the remaining 14 working days in Congress before year's end
And the whopper to finish it off.....
"At the end of the day we’ll have the same president and same candidate and a failed impeachment process, and the only difference would be that the president will have been exonerated of charges," Van Drew said.
Ouch. A blistering attack by a a Dem admitting the Dem process is a failure, a scam, and lacks due process. Admitting that impeachment should be used only in extreme, rare circumstances. Admitting that if it's not bipartisan it is doomed to fail. Admitting that it makes America look like a 3rd world, left wing banana republic. Admitting the process has never been successfully executed in 250 years of America's history. And admitting above all that it will not remove President Trump from office but only lead to his exoneration.
Any Dems dare to refute what he admitted?
Snippets from the article:
"We have to understand, impeachment is something that's supposed to be exceptionally unusual. It is supposed to be bipartisan. It is supposed to be fair," Van Drew said
This has nothing to do with whether you like Donald Trump, or don't like him, or want to see him have a second term or win in an election. This has to do with the institution of impeachment itself and not misusing it," he argued.
"You know, De Tocqueville in 1853 wrote that if a nation was more and more often using...impeachment as a way of actually removing its leaders, it would show the deterioration of the nation," Van Drew said.
"It is so rarely used, should be rarely used. And as I've mentioned to you before, it is something that during the hundreds of years of American history has never been successfully used," he added.
Comparing the impeachment of a president to "more like something you would see in Europe or third-world nations," Van Drew encouraged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to shift her focus to "real issues" for the remaining 14 working days in Congress before year's end
And the whopper to finish it off.....
"At the end of the day we’ll have the same president and same candidate and a failed impeachment process, and the only difference would be that the president will have been exonerated of charges," Van Drew said.
Ouch. A blistering attack by a a Dem admitting the Dem process is a failure, a scam, and lacks due process. Admitting that impeachment should be used only in extreme, rare circumstances. Admitting that if it's not bipartisan it is doomed to fail. Admitting that it makes America look like a 3rd world, left wing banana republic. Admitting the process has never been successfully executed in 250 years of America's history. And admitting above all that it will not remove President Trump from office but only lead to his exoneration.
Any Dems dare to refute what he admitted?
