New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Disqualified!

Alinvegas

Alinvegas

KING

Al,

Hillary Clinton has disqualified herself from being Commander-in-Chief of the United States.

I am the only candidate who can and WILL defeat Hillary.

She purposely mishandled classified information, she's currently under investigation by the FBI, and she LIED to the families of the men who were murdered in Benghazi.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg. If Hillary becomes president she will do irreversible damage to our country. I shudder to even think about it.

Al, we cannot afford a Hillary Clinton presidency. If you want to see her defeated, then you must support my campaign right now. Our nation's future depends on it.

Please follow this link to make an urgent donation right now.

If I don't have your support, I won't be able to win the Republican nomination and then our country will certainly fall into Hillary's hands.

So, Al, if you're like me and are disgusted by her lies, and revolted by the fact the media and so many liberals have let her get away with this, then you need to stand with me right now.

If Hillary Clinton becomes president: The Second Amendment will be under relentless attack, new taxes will inundate our families and small businesses, and our immigration laws will fail to be enforced. It's a horrible thought, but one we must consider to ensure the White House does not fall into the wrong hands (again).

I will never stop fighting for our conservative values and beliefs. I will not stoop to the attacks my Republican opponents are throwing my way, but in order to win the nomination and defeat Hillary, I need your help.

Will you support me and our nation's future right now?

Thanks for your commitment to our nation.

Sincerely,


Marco Rubio

Republican Candidate for President

P.S. We saw Thursday night that my opponents would rather bicker with each other than focus and discuss the critical issues facing our nation. I am focused on keeping America safe and protecting our citizens, but I cannot win this without your support. Please show your commitment to our nation by making a donation to our campaign right now.
 
Alinvegas said:

Al,

Hillary Clinton has disqualified herself from being Commander-in-Chief of the United States.

I am the only candidate who can and WILL defeat Hillary.

She purposely mishandled classified information, she's currently under investigation by the FBI, and she LIED to the families of the men who were murdered in Benghazi.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg. If Hillary becomes president she will do irreversible damage to our country. I shudder to even think about it.

Al, we cannot afford a Hillary Clinton presidency. If you want to see her defeated, then you must support my campaign right now. Our nation's future depends on it.

Please follow this link to make an urgent donation right now.

If I don't have your support, I won't be able to win the Republican nomination and then our country will certainly fall into Hillary's hands.

So, Al, if you're like me and are disgusted by her lies, and revolted by the fact the media and so many liberals have let her get away with this, then you need to stand with me right now.

If Hillary Clinton becomes president: The Second Amendment will be under relentless attack, new taxes will inundate our families and small businesses, and our immigration laws will fail to be enforced. It's a horrible thought, but one we must consider to ensure the White House does not fall into the wrong hands (again).

I will never stop fighting for our conservative values and beliefs. I will not stoop to the attacks my Republican opponents are throwing my way, but in order to win the nomination and defeat Hillary, I need your help.

Will you support me and our nation's future right now?

Thanks for your commitment to our nation.

Sincerely,


Marco Rubio

Republican Candidate for President

P.S. We saw Thursday night that my opponents would rather bicker with each other than focus and discuss the critical issues facing our nation. I am focused on keeping America safe and protecting our citizens, but I cannot win this without your support. Please show your commitment to our nation by making a donation to our campaign right now.
Click to expand...

Send Marco lots of your money.

;-)
 
those are my sentiment as well. and I probably lean more toward Rubio than any other candidate. however . . .

marco Rubio has mishandled the amnesty/illegal immigrant issue. he is getting clobbered by Trump, Cruz, and now apparently even by JEB!, who very few want as president.

Rubio's "back story" is a good one, and he would bring Hispanic voters - especially those struggling to build businesses in America - to the GOP side. But the solution to the amnesty/immigration debate is simple, and he misses it:

  • divert the emphasis from immediately deporting 10 million illegal aliens to preserving American jobs
  • propose strict new rules about how/when US employers can bring foreign H1B visa workers to America
  • No American should have to lose his or her job to a new H1B arrival
  • For illegal immigrants - those with felony charges pending, or past convictions MUST GO. No "sanctuary cities". If you're a drug dealer, have used weapons, committed sex crimes, major fraud - they must all be deported quickly under due process.
  • Return to the "rule of law" on other aliens. Process their requests for visas or citizenship on a case by case basis, each on their own merits.
  • If an alien has zero interest in a legal visa or path to citizenship, he or she can be deported at once too. No free riders on freedom and the benefits of living in America.
  • End the anchor baby loophole.
This is too easy figure. I'm astonished that Rubio - and others - struggle with it.
 
Dawg said:
What, you post diatribes with stats and can't find what IGJD said:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-had-emails-on-server-more-classified-than-top-secret/

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/20/u...clude-material-exceeding-top-secret.html?_r=0
Click to expand...
No, I found what he said. I just didn't find him saying the same thing. You claim he did, but then when I challenged you to link to it, you linked to him saying different things. Did he say the same thing or not? If so, share it. If not, retract your claim and apologize to the group for lying.
 
Everyone but the stupidest dolts in this country know that Hillary's illegal activity has disqualified her from even running for president much less holding the office.

Yet.............there she is in all her glory.........still running.
wtf20.gif
 
Arkady said:
No, I found what he said. I just didn't find him saying the same thing. You claim he did, but then when I challenged you to link to it, you linked to him saying different things. Did he say the same thing or not? If so, share it. If not, retract your claim and apologize to the group for lying.
Click to expand...

Keep defending cankles you claim you don't support will not vote for.......go suck dust
 
Dawg said:
Keep defending cankles you claim you don't support will not vote for.......go suck dust
Click to expand...
Is that your tacit admission that you just made it up? Not to worry: we all knew you made it up, anyway, I just wanted to watch you cower from the challenge, because it's so funny. Cowards aren't good for much, but they can at least be good for a chuckle.
 
Arkady said:
Is that your tacit admission that you just made it up? Not to worry: we all knew you made it up, anyway, I just wanted to watch you cower from the challenge, because it's so funny. Cowards aren't good for much, but they can at least be good for a chuckle.
Click to expand...

I posted what IGJC said, SAP emails................you can call me a coward here, you don't have the balls to do that other than here...............must have sucked to always been bullied in school, but, I can just guess why you always were. Why such a coward to admit you support Cankles_________or lie you would not vote for her? Very cowardly ☻

BTW: to bad you not really a lawyer, Hillary is going to need another bus load.........LMAO.....$250,000 year posting in frays.........LMFAO........oh well, libs will fall for anything, stand for nothing.
 
Dawg said:
I posted what IGJC said,
Click to expand...

Yes. And what he said wasn't what you claimed he said. So, I've challenged you to back up your claim. Your response has been to cower from the challenge. If you don't like having your cowardice called out, I'd recommend you stop behaving that way. Man up and maybe some day someone will respect you.
 
Arkady said:
Yes. And what he said wasn't what you claimed he said. So, I've challenged you to back up your claim. Your response has been to cower from the challenge. If you don't like having your cowardice called out, I'd recommend you stop behaving that way. Man up and maybe some day someone will respect you.
Click to expand...

Troll somewhere else and thanks for proving to readers you damn sure not what you claim you are................name calling, reach arounds and personal insults is all you got son...................don't try reflecting on me what you are...........BOO
 
Dawg said:
Troll somewhere else and thanks for proving to readers you damn sure not what you claim you are................name calling, reach arounds and personal insults is all you got son...................don't try reflecting on me what you are...........BOO
Click to expand...
You lied about the IG statements. You were called on it. Quit your blubbing.
 
Arkady said:
You lied about the IG statements. You were called on it. Quit your blubbing.
Click to expand...

You're trying to BAIT the wrong Man, sonny, it's not working. IGJD said Hillary had SAP's........go cry to cankles.
 
Dawg said:
You're trying to BAIT the wrong Man, sonny, it's not working. IGJD said Hillary had SAP's........go cry to cankles.
Click to expand...
On the off chance you're simply suffering from senior dementia and have forgotten how we got here, here's a reminder:

Alinvegas copied and pasted some propaganda from Marco Rubio. That propaganda was full of a number of specific claims, including:
  • Clinton has disqualified herself from being CinC.
  • She purposefully mishandled classified information.
  • She lied to the families of the men murdered in Benghazi.
  • If elected, she will do irreversible damage to the nation.
  • Rubio's the only candidate who can beat Clinton.
  • The nation's future depends on supporting Rubio's campaign now.
And so on.

You responded: "Inspector General of Justice Department says same thing"

I challenged you: "Could you link to him saying the same thing?"

Since, obviously, there's no record of the Inspector General saying those things, you were in a pickle. The honorable thing, obviously, would be to retract your statement, apologize to people here for misleading them, and explain how you made that mistake. But nobody here expects someone like you to have any sense of honor, so you did the expected thing, instead: you attacked me and posted two links to the IG saying other things. I pointed out that these were not links of the IG saying the same things Rubio/Alinvegas said, and I challenged you to post something backing up your lie. At that point, it was mostly about enjoying the low comedy of your cowardly squirming. Watching spineless people collapse in the face of a challenge is always good for a chuckle.
 
Arkady said:
On the off chance you're simply suffering from senior dementia and have forgotten how we got here, here's a reminder:

Alinvegas copied and pasted some propaganda from Marco Rubio. That propaganda was full of a number of specific claims, including:
  • Clinton has disqualified herself from being CinC.
  • She purposefully mishandled classified information.
  • She lied to the families of the men murdered in Benghazi.
  • If elected, she will do irreversible damage to the nation.
  • Rubio's the only candidate who can beat Clinton.
  • The nation's future depends on supporting Rubio's campaign now.
And so on.

You responded: "Inspector General of Justice Department says same thing"

I challenged you: "Could you link to him saying the same thing?"

Since, obviously, there's no record of the Inspector General saying those things, you were in a pickle. The honorable thing, obviously, would be to retract your statement, apologize to people here for misleading them, and explain how you made that mistake. But nobody here expects someone like you to have any sense of honor, so you did the expected thing, instead: you attacked me and posted two links to the IG saying other things. I pointed out that these were not links of the IG saying the same things Rubio/Alinvegas said, and I challenged you to post something backing up your lie. At that point, it was mostly about enjoying the low comedy of your cowardly squirming. Watching spineless people collapse in the face of a challenge is always good for a chuckle.
Click to expand...

Will this do?

The simple proposition that everyone is equal before the law suggests that Mrs. Clinton’s state of mind—whether mere knowledge of what she was doing as to mishandling classified information; or gross negligence in the case of the mishandling of information relating to national defense; or bad intent as to actual or attempted destruction of email messages; or corrupt intent as to State Department business—justifies a criminal charge of one sort or another.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/clintons-emails-a-criminal-charge-is-justified-1453419158
 
Lukey said:
Will this do?

The simple proposition that everyone is equal before the law suggests that Mrs. Clinton’s state of mind—whether mere knowledge of what she was doing as to mishandling classified information; or gross negligence in the case of the mishandling of information relating to national defense; or bad intent as to actual or attempted destruction of email messages; or corrupt intent as to State Department business—justifies a criminal charge of one sort or another.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/clintons-emails-a-criminal-charge-is-justified-1453419158
Click to expand...
Obviously not. You seem not to be following the thread. It's not that difficult, really. The first poster put up a bunch of claims by Rubio. Then Dawg claimed that the IG had said the same. To substantiate that, Dawg would need to post something showing the IG making those same claims, obviously. That is impossible since, as you know, the IG never said the majority of those things. A link to a bit of propaganda from a Bush administration official carried by the Rupert Murdoch tabloid empire doesn't cut it, unless it provides quotations of the IG saying those same things Rubio said.... which it doesn't.

The simple fact is Dawg lied. He wanted people in the forum to think the IG had said those same things, even though he knew that was untrue. I called him on it.
 
Arkady said:
Obviously not. You seem not to be following the thread. It's not that difficult, really. The first poster put up a bunch of claims by Rubio. Then Dawg claimed that the IG had said the same. To substantiate that, Dawg would need to post something showing the IG making those same claims, obviously. That is impossible since, as you know, the IG never said the majority of those things. A link to a bit of propaganda from a Bush administration official carried by the Rupert Murdoch tabloid empire doesn't cut it, unless it provides quotations of the IG saying those same things Rubio said.... which it doesn't.

The simple fact is Dawg lied. He wanted people in the forum to think the IG had said those same things, even though he knew that was untrue. I called him on it.
Click to expand...

I don't care - and your standard "tabloid" or "rw blog" doesn't impress me half as much as if you actually responded in substance to the charges contained therein. How about this one?

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/21/f...hina-and-iran-accessed-hillarys-server-video/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top