New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Does this board maintain a list of banned words?

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
you know...like your common 4 letter expletives or terms...that are in turn **** starred out when detected?

Since moderating is likely not going anywhere fast...

If such exists...why not expand the list to include common inciteful terms...

like: teabagger. or. marxist muslim.

don't know if such is or is not..

but hey...worth a heave ho...
 
you know...like your common 4 letter expletives or terms...that are in turn **** starred out when detected?

Since moderating is likely not going anywhere fast...

If such exists...why not expand the list to include common inciteful terms...

like: teabagger. or. marxist muslim.

don't know if such is or is not..

but hey...worth a heave ho...
Shit (shite)
Piss (Pisse)
:censored::censored::censored::censored: (Fack)
:censored::censored::censored::censored: (can't)
 
:censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored: (cacksacker)
 
Mother:censored::censored::censored::censored:er (motherfacker)
:censored::censored::censored::censored: (tats)
 
And then I know that
:censored::censored::censored::censored::censored: (Biatch)

is caught


H
 
HAd to use 4 posts to get the test done.... because you are limited to 10 "picture gifs" per post...
 
Not gonna list the banned terms it's pretty much common sense. If you use one it will get censored automatically it's not a big deal.
 
What? I wouldn't be allowed to call Obama a socialist any more? Well
censored.gif
censored.gif
censored.gif
censored.gif
!
 
you ok? hope you didnt hurt yourself.

but seriously..

maybing curbing the animus by blocking some of the derogatories?
 
It's not the words, PF. Most of us have a pretty good idea of what words are unacceptable. I think that we mistakenly came here thinking we had reached heaven and all nasty discourse and discord would be gone and we wouldn't have anyone here that wanted to cause trouble with us. I sort of had an epiphany about that recently: Moderating can't fix everything. And we certainly don't need or want to be moderated to death. If the moderator or moderating panel throws out an infraction or a suspension or a banning for every little thing, then this board is going to die a quick death.

What has to happen is that we need to grow up a bit. We have to take responsibility for ourselves and not do some things, but most of all, we need to keep the thick skin we developed over on that other board that died. We have it. But some of us must've thrown it away when we got here.

There are always going to be people who like to push our buttons. So what? So we go running to Dave crying "ban him!!" Sheeesh. WTH are we thinking? Do we need to do that? Are we big babies or something?

Moderating has to be there on the table because some people push the envelope to the point that something must be done. But really, that's all that moderators need to do.............take care of those egregious instances and people. Dave and Chris need help in moderating because so many of us are turning in all sorts of little line crossing episodes that should be ignored. And some of us are about to explode because we don't want to get into trouble for fighting back when we are attacked............so we just walk away from posts that attack. And that's not fun.

Notice that I haven't even addressed those who attack. I won't do that. They are who they are. They do what they do because they get some perverse pleasure from it. We cannot change them. We can just make ourselves impervious to their attacks.

I don't have the perfect answer (yet). But I do know that we need a thicker skin around here. We can't control the attackers, but we can put that thick skin that's impervious to attacks back on. It's needed.
 
sorry about that Dave. worded poorly...meant the selection process for moderators what with the back and forth amongst... certainly not the moderators or moderating..
 
yeah...Degs made that abundantly clear. Meant the pejoratives that are tossed about...

no matter. just a thought..
 
It's not the words, PF. Most of us have a pretty good idea of what words are unacceptable. I think that we mistakenly came here thinking we had reached heaven and all nasty discourse and discord would be gone and we wouldn't have anyone here that wanted to cause trouble with us
Oh please, drop the innocent little miss muffent appproach. You continually engage in drive by 3rd person name calling that is unprovoked. Your posting is largely content free and your reporting of quality posters for the most minor of offenses is legend.

This notion of "we all have to grow up a bit" is like the abusive parent telling his children that emotional self-control is important.
 
Yeah, and while we're at it, how about censuring the words leftie, liberal, left-winger and libidiot...for just a start. And then, of course,...we could always expand that no-no vocabulary to include words like....

commie, socialist, and maybe even warm and fuzzy terms like "stuck on stupid".

you know...like your common 4 letter expletives or terms...that are in turn **** starred out when detected?

Since moderating is likely not going anywhere fast...

If such exists...why not expand the list to include common inciteful terms...

like: teabagger. or. marxist muslim.

don't know if such is or is not..

but hey...worth a heave ho...
 
surely we can agree that it cuts both ways? there's an overabundance of folk on both sides that are here...expressly..to push buttons and demean...whether singularly or wholesale.

i'm not immune. but i dont make a career of it either.
 
I didn't mention "left" or "right" here. Yes. It cuts both ways. My post was saying that we ALL need a thicker skin. Some people come here only to push buttons.............some of us push buttons sometimes. Probably all of us push buttons some of the time. But the bottom line is that we need to develop a thicker skin rather than run to the moderators at the drop of a hat (or unkind word).

surely we can agree that it cuts both ways? there's an overabundance of folk on both sides that are here...expressly..to push buttons and demean...whether singularly or wholesale.

i'm not immune. but i dont make a career of it either.
 
We all have the right to our opinion. In my opinion, yours sucks about 95% of the time. But you are who you are. Nothing is going to change that and I wouldn't dream of trying.



Oh please, drop the innocent little miss muffent appproach. You continually engage in drive by 3rd person name calling that is unprovoked. Your posting is largely content free and your reporting of quality posters for the most minor of offenses is legend.

This notion of "we all have to grow up a bit" is like the abusive parent telling his children that emotional self-control is important.
 
We all have the right to our opinion. In my opinion, yours sucks about 95% of the time. But you are who you are. Nothing is going to change that and I wouldn't dream of trying.

So show FACTUALLY how it sucks. Don't call names.

you are entitled to your OPINION but not your own facts. and that's the point. Not all opinions are equal in value, insight or ignorance. Clearly someone who has no knowledge of Latvian has very little basis for holding an opinion between the word Miksts and Maigs. You of course are ENTITLED to that opinion and have a right to hold it.

But that does not mean your opinion in that circumstance has any meaningful contribution to the overall discourse. And part of being an adult is to recognize when you lack actual verifiable factual support for your "opinion" and instead shut up and learn.

Other times when you actually can support your opinion, it makes sense to contribute and to correct or enlighten a conversation.

But running around posting "Liberals Suck" and "DemocRATS are stupid" only reflects on you. And when you make statements that are factually false (like Obama doesn't work past 4pm) that are resonant with racist comments and then DON'T EVEN OWN YOUR MISTAKE when corrected... You come across as racist. and that repeated pattern of doing so is telling.

And yes, you will probably be able to congratulate yourself on being the primary reason Political Jack has two less participants who actually contribute CONTENT.

Take some personal responsibility please
 
Back
Top