New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Double-voting – even triple-voting – found in US elections

No voter fraud my ass.

Once was apparently not enough for Pasco Parker.

Prosecutors say the 63-year-old Tennessee man voted in the 2012 presidential election, not once ... not twice ... but three times, in three different states.

"It's too easy to vote twice, it comes down to your honor," said Jay DeLancy, executive director of North Carolina volunteer voting watchdog group The Voting Integrity Project, which caught Parker.

DeLancy cited the case as an example of the kind of voter fraud that some have dismissed as overblown. "It's a lot more widespread than what people think, because the general public thinks there is no voter fraud. As proof they look at prosecutions, but we have learned how difficult it is to get prosecutions," he said.

It was DeLancy's group that brought Parker's case to the attention of election officials and law enforcement – and Parker is not alone. His was one of 149 cases of suspected double-voting DeLancy says his group has turned over.

In Parker’s case, he was charged with voter fraud for votes in the Nov. 6, 2012, presidential election. He voted in person at his polling place in Spring Hill, Tenn. Authorities say that was after previously mailing in another vote by absentee ballot in Florida on Oct. 28, and yet another absentee ballot vote in North Carolina the following day. He pleaded guilty to felony voter registration and felony voting fraud in Rutherford County, N.C., last November, and was spared jail time under the law.

In Wisconsin, 52-year-old Robert Monroe also was sentenced to jail earlier this year after he was charged with 13 counts of election fraud, including multiple voting and voting twice in the 2012 presidential race. Prosecutors say Monroe voted by absentee ballot, where he lives in Shorewood, Wis., on Nov. 1, 2012. Then on election day five days later, authorities say he drove four hours south to Lebanon, Ind., to vote in person, using his Indiana drivers license to sign in.

Even a 2012 Democratic congressional candidate was caught and had to drop out of the race.

Party officials said candidate Wendy Rosen, who was running in Maryland's 1st Congressional District, had voted twice in Maryland and Florida in two separate elections. She pleaded guilty to voting illegally in two elections.

And in Cincinnati, veteran poll worker Melowese Richardson was accused of voting twice in the 2012 presidential election, after Hamilton County prosecutors charged her in 2013 with eight counts of illegal voting over several elections. She pleaded guilty to four counts, and prosecutors said she had even voted in the presidential election for her sister, who had been in a coma for almost a decade. Richardson was sentenced to five years in prison but was released early.

In Kansas, Lincoln Wilson also was charged with voting in both that state and in Colorado, where records show he is a registered Republican. He was accused of multiple counts stemming from the 2010, 2012, and 2014 elections.

And this past June, it turned out that the California presidential primary was not immune to the double-voting phenomenon. The East Bay Times reported that "in just three counties, Contra Costa, Alameda and Santa Clara, 194 people voted twice, suggesting the abuse statewide might run into the thousands."

Some suggest the number of potential double voters could be much higher than that.

A 2012 Pew Center on The States study said "approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state." Pew said 68,000 people were registered in three states, and 1,807 were even registered in three states.

Others contend the matches of voters' names in two or multiple states are merely coincidences and clerical errors, and that the potential for people voting more than once is overblown.

The Brennan Center for Justice, considered the nation's leading election system monitoring group, issued a 2007 report on the problem. It said "these cases are extremely rare, in part because the penalty (criminal prosecution) is so severe, and the payoff (one incremental vote) is so minimal. It is far more common, however, to see allegations of epidemic double-voting that are unfounded. Such claims are usually premised on matching lists of voters from one place to another, but upon closer inspection, the match process shows error.”

While elections officials insist that there are sufficient safeguards to prevent double-voting, DeLancy fears the possibility is very real, as evidenced by the cases his group has seen. He says prosecutors need to do more.

"Election fraud is a crime against the entire American public. It is a crime against the Constitution and a crime against the foundations of our nation," he said.
 
I've always found it odd how the left can at times give the lecture on how voting is a precious right that must be utilized etc... but then treat the idea of fraud to any degree so lightly.

Of course, it's obvious when and why they give the lecture, and why they don't like to talk about voter fraud...
 
1. A few cases of idiots who courted jail time to have little real effect on an election's outcome.
2. The voter ID laws intended to disfranchise large numbers of Blacks, students, the elderly, rural voters, transgender voters, etc., would've done nothing to prevent any of these cases.
 
1. A few cases of idiots who courted jail time to have little real effect on an election's outcome.
2. The voter ID laws intended to disfranchise large numbers of Blacks, students, the elderly, rural voters, transgender voters, etc., would've done nothing to prevent any of these cases.

Students should vote in the state of their primary residence in the district of their primary residence. If they are away from home,they can use an absentee ballott. Unless they are a taxpayer - filing as a resident of that state, paying taxes to that state and that locality, then they should not be voting there. No one is disenfranchising them. They have the right to vote absentee like anyone else who is temporarily relocated from their permanent residence.But you only get to vote based on your permanent residence.

The reality is these students want to claim permanent residency with their parents - so their parents can still claim them as dependents, but then want the opportunity to skew the vote in the localities they are currently studying in. THAT should be prohibited.

connie
 
Students should vote in the state of their primary residence in the district of their primary residence. If they are away from home,they can use an absentee ballott. Unless they are a taxpayer - filing as a resident of that state, paying taxes to that state and that locality, then they should not be voting there. No one is disenfranchising them. They have the right to vote absentee like anyone else who is temporarily relocated from their permanent residence.But you only get to vote based on your permanent residence.

The reality is these students want to claim permanent residency with their parents - so their parents can still claim them as dependents, but then want the opportunity to skew the vote in the localities they are currently studying in. THAT should be prohibited.

connie

Even though they may be stakeholders in the new locale, and legislative decisions on (for example) college funding or air quality can directly affect them?

A large majority of cases of voter fraud (not including voter suppression) ... including 2 of the 5 specified multiple-voting cases mentioned in the top post ... involves absentee ballots. I think absentee ballots are vital for some people who would otherwise be unable to vote. But if we're really concerned about voter fraud, we should be discouraging, not encouraging, the unnecessary use of them.
 
Even though they may be stakeholders in the new locale, and legislative decisions on (for example) college funding or air quality can directly affect them?

A large majority of cases of voter fraud (not including voter suppression) ... including 2 of the 5 specified multiple-voting cases mentioned in the top post ... involves absentee ballots. I think absentee ballots are vital for some people who would otherwise be unable to vote. But if we're really concerned about voter fraud, we should be discouraging, not encouraging, the unnecessary use of them.

If they are stakeholders than it should be their official residence, which means they make the decision between being a stakeholder there - or getting the other benefits provided to their family by claiming them in their home district.

Absentee ballots do not need to be discouraged. But, what does need to happen is that they need to be electronically tracked so they can be cross checked against voter roles and actual votes cast.
 
If they are stakeholders than it should be their official residence, which means they make the decision between being a stakeholder there - or getting the other benefits provided to their family by claiming them in their home district.

Absentee ballots do not need to be discouraged. But, what does need to happen is that they need to be electronically tracked so they can be cross checked against voter roles and actual votes cast.
Votes should be cast on election day at the registered person's polling place, unless it is an absentee ballot with a notarized legitimate excuse.

The price paid for the right to vote was too great for it to be made as easy as it is.
 
If they are stakeholders than it should be their official residence, which means they make the decision between being a stakeholder there - or getting the other benefits provided to their family by claiming them in their home district.

Absentee ballots do not need to be discouraged. But, what does need to happen is that they need to be electronically tracked so they can be cross checked against voter roles and actual votes cast.

Sounds reasonable, if you're talking about a uniform national standard.
 
1. A few cases of idiots who courted jail time to have little real effect on an election's outcome.
2. The voter ID laws intended to disfranchise large numbers of Blacks, students, the elderly, rural voters, transgender voters, etc., would've done nothing to prevent any of these cases.
You are going to need a lot of dead people.
 
Even though they may be stakeholders in the new locale, and legislative decisions on (for example) college funding or air quality can directly affect them?

A large majority of cases of voter fraud (not including voter suppression) ... including 2 of the 5 specified multiple-voting cases mentioned in the top post ... involves absentee ballots. I think absentee ballots are vital for some people who would otherwise be unable to vote. But if we're really concerned about voter fraud, we should be discouraging, not encouraging, the unnecessary use of them.

stakeholders pay state income tax
 
No voter fraud my ass.

Once was apparently not enough for Pasco Parker.

Prosecutors say the 63-year-old Tennessee man voted in the 2012 presidential election, not once ... not twice ... but three times, in three different states.
Do you have a middle name for Pasco?

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890

"When Donald Trump claimed, 'the election's going to be rigged,' he wasn't entirely wrong. But the threat was not, as Trump warned, from Americans committing the crime of 'voting many, many times.'

"What's far more likely to undermine democracy in November is the culmination of a decade-long Republican effort to disenfranchise voters under the guise of battling voter fraud.


"The latest tool: Election officials in more than two dozen states have compiled lists of citizens whom they allege could be registered in more than one state – thus potentially able to cast multiple ballots – and eligible to be purged from the voter rolls."
 
http://christiantimesnewspaper.com/...dulent-clinton-votes-found-in-ohio-warehouse/

Yeah, what fraud!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is exactly what I have been afraid would happen. They are voting early in Colorado and Ohio and with some minor checking they have already found thousands of dead people voting. The election officials asked if those votes would be removed said no as they don't know which ones to pull, so they will be counted.
The boxes full of ballots means someone needs jail time.
 
1. A few cases of idiots who courted jail time to have little real effect on an election's outcome.
2. The voter ID laws intended to disfranchise large numbers of Blacks, students, the elderly, rural voters, transgender voters, etc., would've done nothing to prevent any of these cases.
Oh, you mean much like gun laws. LOLOL
 
Back
Top