New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Election Integrity

So don't read it. It's not an opinion it's a fact.

It is behind a paywall....

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
  • Overall, we rate The Epoch Times Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as numerous failed fact checks.
On December 20, 2019, Facebook took down more than 600 accounts connected to The Epoch Times. According to an NBC News report, “The network was called ‘The BL’ and was run by Vietnamese users posing as Americans, using fake photos generated by algorithms to simulate real identities. The Epoch Media group, which pushes a variety of pro-Trump conspiracy theories, spent $9.5 million on ads to spread content through the now-suspended pages and groups.”
 
Once again. Do you not understand, paywall or not, that it's a fact that a court reinstated Florida election laws. QUESTIONABLE SOURCE of no consequence.

You're looking pretty silly trying to kill the messenger.
 
Last edited:
Once again. Do you not understand, paywall or not, that it's a fact that a court reinstated Florida election laws. QUESTIONABLE SOURCE of no consequence.

You're looking pretty silly.
One cannot argue with bots and/or DNC employees.
 
Once again. Do you not understand, paywall or not, that it's a fact that a court reinstated Florida election laws. QUESTIONABLE SOURCE of no consequence.

You're looking pretty silly.

You provided a source for your claim that cannot be read without paying for access. It is tin foil hat territory, so why bother?

Here are some facts for you...

Court observers expected the reversal, noting the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit's reputation as a more conservative court with three judges appointed by President Donald Trump.

So why did the appeals court overturn the lower court ruling? Was it because the Trump appointees felt the law actually improved election integrity? NO. It was because of a previous ruling called the Purcell principle that changes to election law should not occur too close to the election.

One part of the Fla law says you can't give refreshments to people standing in line to vote...tell me why that makes for a fair election? So while Florida has a reputation for making the lines run into hours in minority areas by limiting polling machines...it is now illegal to give someone water....WTF?

 
I chalk it up to a belligerent personality.

@RickWA posted this in a reply to me...

Complete and total lapdog.

You posted this:

You're looking pretty silly.

What have I posted that is belligerent? Disputing your information with facts is not being belligerent. Tossing out insults is.
 
Bots have no personality. Just 1’s and 0’s.

Yet another attack on other posters and a complete failure to express any thought on the topic. Why do you bother? Is there some satisfaction you get from dragging every conversation off into an attempt to discredit other opinions through insults?
 
Yet another attack on other posters and a complete failure to express any thought on the topic. Why do you bother? Is there some satisfaction you get from dragging every conversation off into an attempt to discredit other opinions through insults?
Perhaps I should be a hyper-partisan DNC stooge-bot like you, eh, genius?
 
theepochtimes.com - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

OP is using my KOOK site list as a suggested reading list. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Once again. Do you not understand, paywall or not, that it's a fact that a court reinstated Florida election laws. QUESTIONABLE SOURCE of no consequence.

You're looking pretty silly trying to kill the messenger.

An honest person would link to a credible source that is not behind a paywall.

You link to a wackjob right wing screed - the Epoch Times - that is behind a paywall.

And you don’t even see anything wrong with that.
 
An honest person would link to a credible source that is not behind a paywall.

You link to a wackjob right wing screed - the Epoch Times - that is behind a paywall.

And you don’t even see anything wrong with that.


Lord knows I try. I created and freely gave them my wonderful list of KOOK sites so they could avoid the embarrasment of looking like morons but it seems that many of them look upon my list as a list of actual news sources. As hard as it it may seem - I oversestimated their intelligence.
 
Back
Top