You didn't read the article, did you?
The report said the ambassador had dinner with the Benghazi city council on the night of Sept. 10, 2012, and had a briefing that day at the Annex, a facility operated by the CIA.
Okay, so there's two spins you have going, one denying that Stevens only arrived four hours before the attack, which of course you are not denying but you keep spinning like a top trying to make it look false without actually saying so because it isn't false... Jesus, MV, can't you ever just type plain English?You didn't read the article, did you?
The report said the ambassador had dinner with the Benghazi city council on the night of Sept. 10, 2012, and had a briefing that day at the Annex, a facility operated by the CIA.
more than just on her watch, he was there on her orders. She (and MV) kept trying to cover that up.Who cares?
They got him on Hillary's watch.
It helped keep her from the WH; may his soul rest in peace.
Okay, so there's two spins you have going, one denying that Stevens only arrived four hours before the attack, which of course you are not denying but you keep spinning like a top trying to make it look false without actually saying so because it isn't false... Jesus, MV, can't you ever just type plain English?
The other denying that his visit had anything to do with her e-mail, when you saw this article, you kind of dropped that one for the moment, but I'm sure you will go back to it after a couple more spins.
more than just on her watch, he was there on her orders. She (and MV) kept trying to cover that up.
No, when you spin, I call it spin. The ambassador arrived at the complex 4 hours before the attack. He was sent there by Hillary, and that mission was in her e-mail.When you don't know what you are talking about you always respond to the facts that it is just spin. No it isn't.
The ambassador, according to both the link I provided and your own, arrived on 9/10...yet you continue to argue that he arrived a few hours before the attack...which is the basis for your uninformed assertion that the terrorists must have discovered that he was coming to town from Hillary's email server....
Stevens had been in Benghazi for two days. He had met with numerous locals, including the Benghazi City council...meaning his presence there was not a secret.
Now, do you want to admit that your entire premise is nonsense or what?
I don't actually have any of her e-mail. Do you actually believe that she communicated to Stevens a mission and didn't show any evidence of it in her e-mail? Her server was unprotected, I'm sure there was signs of the mission in there. Didn't even have to be e-mail to Stevens. The whole planet was reading her server in real time, if you don't understand that yet, you are kidding yourself.1. Do you actually have an email that instructed Stevens to go to Benghazi? No.
2. The instructions were to make the consulate in Benghazi a permanent installation. Did he have to travel to Benghazi to do that? No.
You seem to have discovered a different tangent now....Have you given up on the bullshit that Stevens arrived in Benghazi and 4 hours later the milita attacked the consulate?
No, when you spin, I call it spin. The ambassador arrived at the complex 4 hours before the attack. He was sent there by Hillary, and that mission was in her e-mail.
Do you have a point, already? make it.
Because I can vaguely remember from pages ago that you were trying to deny that this trip had anything to do with her e-mail. You have broadly proven that to be untrue. Anything else?
Stevens was sent to Benghazi ambassador complex on 09/11 by Hillary. Hillary's e-mail server was unprotected, so those travel plans were compromised. So, what did the attackers have to go on? They knew Stevens would be there on 09/11. So they planned an attack for 10pm on the night of the 11th.1. How did Stevens have dinner with the Benghazi City Council on 9/10 if he arrived in Benghazi on 9/11?
2. I said the attack had nothing at all to do with Hillary's email being hacked.
Stevens was sent to Benghazi ambassador complex on 09/11 by Hillary. Hillary's e-mail server was unprotected, so those travel plans were compromised. So, what did the attackers have to go on? They knew Stevens would be there on 09/11. So they planned an attack for 10pm on the night of the 11th.
quit spinning.
You keep dancing around the whole point, I keep making the same point over and over, I'm real tired of this MV.
okay, just go on lying. I'm done with this.You don't have a point. Hillary did not send Stevens to Benghazi. Her instructions did not include anything about going there. He did not travel on 9/11...he arrived in Benghazi on 9/10 as proven by both your link and mine.
What did the attackers have to go on? How about information from Libyans guarding the consulate? How about members of the Benghazi City Council who had dinner with Stevens the night before? What about people at the Benghazi airport or their own people watching the consulate?
You keep saying that the only way they could have known is from Hillary's email server...and yet you refuse to acknowledge that there is no evidence of that, there is no evidence that they even knew the ambassador was there...but that there are lots of ways they could have known.
Deal with the facts and not the crap that people on the right have invented out of thin air.
Stevens was sent to Benghazi ambassador complex on 09/11 by Hillary. Hillary's e-mail server was unprotected, so those travel plans were compromised. So, what did the attackers have to go on? They knew Stevens would be there on 09/11. So they planned an attack for 10pm on the night of the 11th.