New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Executive Orders

Nope. I haven't said there's any problem with executive orders. In fact, my favorite president was a huge fan of them. I can have a problem with a particular executive order, based on content, but I don't object to the concept of them, the way the Republicans pretended to. I've simply pointed out the hypocrisy of those who think they're an outrage when a Democrat is president and no big deal when a Republican is.

FDR?
 
I'm not so particularly opposed to the use of EOs but moreso their use as a way to expand the size and scope of government (as Obama's generally did). If they are used to REDUCE the size and scope of government, why would anyone be opposed to that? Everyone knows how difficult it is to put the big government toothpaste back in the tube. Using EOs to accomplish that seems like a good deal for the taxpayer, the workers, the producers, etc. Oh right, everyone but the Democrats' base...
 
Public Citizen comments on Trump, United Technologies, and the First Hundred Days:

http://www.citizen.org/sites/defaul...with-corporate-offshorers-continues-final.pdf

"Yet as we mark President Trump’s first 100 days, the Trump Administration continues to reward – not punish – U.S. companies that offshore U.S. jobs.

"Despite the president having expansive executive authority to set procurement policy and past presidents using that authority to deliver on their policy commitments and goals, the Trump administration has failed to exclude offshoring firms from qualifying for billions of dollars in federal contracts.:eek:

"In fact, United Technologies is still receiving contracts under his administration despite going ahead with plans to relocate more than 1,000 jobs to Mexico even after Trump’s intervention."
 
Yep. I'm well aware he has his issues as a president (e.g., internment camps), but I think he did more to improve the quality of life of the majority of Americans than any president other than, perhaps, Lincoln.

EO's..........at least now not against America


Ya one funny Lawyer guy..............evidently not very important as you claim to be here in Boston

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime...-charge/ar-BBAx56e?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Who hires a Lawyer that spends 24/7 on a political fray☻
 
Yes, Trump ran on undoing Obama executive orders and is doing it. It's one of the quickest and most productive things he can do to undo Obama era silliness. Like Obama, Trump has a phone. Trump has a pen. And what's wrong with having a pace of executive orders three times that of Obama when reversing Obama executive orders is what people who supported him expected to do?

Wanna make a bet? I'll bet you the three times the pace doesn't last a year. Loser donates $100.

Trump did away with an EPA rule that kept mining companies from dumping mine waste in creeks and streams...and you think that was productive?

He did away with a rule that American energy companies report financial transactions with foreign countries. Is corruption productive?
 
Of course you are. You're whining about people who objected to Obama's use of EOs, while clutching your pearls and looking around for your fainting couch over Trump's EOs. If you can produce some posts of yours complaining about Obama's use of EOs, you may have a case, although a weak one, given your servility to all things DNC.

Do you deny being here in service to the RNC?
 
Nope. I haven't said there's any problem with executive orders. In fact, my favorite president was a huge fan of them. I can have a problem with a particular executive order, based on content, but I don't object to the concept of them, the way the Republicans pretended to. I've simply pointed out the hypocrisy of those who think they're an outrage when a Democrat is president and no big deal when a Republican is.
live in fear your complacency with obama's power grab created this mess we are coming for you. just remember that.
 
Back
Top