New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Fair Question

Zam-Zam

Senator
I believe the American people have a right to know:

Who was really running the country while Biden was president?

...These inquiries have been spurred by new revelations about the president’s declining mental condition gleaned from the recently released “Original Sin,” written by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’s Alex Thompson, which chronicles the extreme measures taken to hide Biden’s deterioration from the public.

In addition, audio tapes of special counsel Robert Hur’s interview with Biden showed not just an “elderly man with a poor memory,” as Hur generously described Biden, but a person who has experienced serious mental decline. His confusion and lapses have raised even more questions about who was in charge of the country between 2021 and 2024. It’s become increasingly clear that it was not Biden.

We know this because we have a solid example where the former president was asked about an important policy switch that he had purportedly authored — and he got it wrong, denying he had made the change. Also, it was reported contemporaneously that in negotiations on important topics, Biden was reduced to reading from note cards and seemed detached from the conversations.

Someone else was almost certainly writing those note cards and giving the president his talking points. Biden was barely capable of putting two sentences together, much less sifting through details critical to crafting legislation or even policy...

...The White House and even the newly aware media is now pursuing the one remaining piece of the puzzle: Who was creating and then putting in place policies supposedly vetted by the president, and who else used the “autopen” found on so many documents? Was it Mike Donilon, who is cited by a recent piece in the Times of London? Or long-time adviser Anita Dunn? We just don’t know.

This is not just a fishing expedition. The public must know if some of Biden’s rules and policies were executed without his knowledge or consent. There is a possibility that Congress could challenge the legality of measures adopted by presidential aides or officials, rather than the country’s chief executive.




Complete text: Republicans scrutinize Biden's pardons and autopen use


My guess is that whoever was running the nation will do their level-best to keep it a secret.
 
I have baseless theories too. And they are equally impossible to prove. Let's waste everyone's time and investigate those as well.
Just because I hate people as much as Zam does.
 
I believe the American people have a right to know:

Who was really running the country while Biden was president?

...These inquiries have been spurred by new revelations about the president’s declining mental condition gleaned from the recently released “Original Sin,” written by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’s Alex Thompson, which chronicles the extreme measures taken to hide Biden’s deterioration from the public.

In addition, audio tapes of special counsel Robert Hur’s interview with Biden showed not just an “elderly man with a poor memory,” as Hur generously described Biden, but a person who has experienced serious mental decline. His confusion and lapses have raised even more questions about who was in charge of the country between 2021 and 2024. It’s become increasingly clear that it was not Biden.

We know this because we have a solid example where the former president was asked about an important policy switch that he had purportedly authored — and he got it wrong, denying he had made the change. Also, it was reported contemporaneously that in negotiations on important topics, Biden was reduced to reading from note cards and seemed detached from the conversations.

Someone else was almost certainly writing those note cards and giving the president his talking points. Biden was barely capable of putting two sentences together, much less sifting through details critical to crafting legislation or even policy...

...The White House and even the newly aware media is now pursuing the one remaining piece of the puzzle: Who was creating and then putting in place policies supposedly vetted by the president, and who else used the “autopen” found on so many documents? Was it Mike Donilon, who is cited by a recent piece in the Times of London? Or long-time adviser Anita Dunn? We just don’t know.

This is not just a fishing expedition. The public must know if some of Biden’s rules and policies were executed without his knowledge or consent. There is a possibility that Congress could challenge the legality of measures adopted by presidential aides or officials, rather than the country’s chief executive.




Complete text: Republicans scrutinize Biden's pardons and autopen use


My guess is that whoever was running the nation will do their level-best to keep it a secret.

We will have to wait for the book, at this point it is very clear that Robinette Jr. was not in control. My guess is that it was a group of obongo acolytes.
 
I have baseless theories too. And they are equally impossible to prove. Let's waste everyone's time and investigate those as well.
Just because I hate people as much as Zam does.
Indeed, being an incurious, unquestioning, passive, uncritical, docile, uninquisitive sheep is the best play here. As always, the usual suspects can be counted upon to advocate for no information over information…darkness over light.

Personally, I prefer the good old days…when “enlightened” had the word “light” in it.
 
I believe the American people have a right to know:

Who was really running the country while Biden was president?

...These inquiries have been spurred by new revelations about the president’s declining mental condition gleaned from the recently released “Original Sin,” written by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’s Alex Thompson, which chronicles the extreme measures taken to hide Biden’s deterioration from the public.

In addition, audio tapes of special counsel Robert Hur’s interview with Biden showed not just an “elderly man with a poor memory,” as Hur generously described Biden, but a person who has experienced serious mental decline. His confusion and lapses have raised even more questions about who was in charge of the country between 2021 and 2024. It’s become increasingly clear that it was not Biden.

We know this because we have a solid example where the former president was asked about an important policy switch that he had purportedly authored — and he got it wrong, denying he had made the change. Also, it was reported contemporaneously that in negotiations on important topics, Biden was reduced to reading from note cards and seemed detached from the conversations.

Someone else was almost certainly writing those note cards and giving the president his talking points. Biden was barely capable of putting two sentences together, much less sifting through details critical to crafting legislation or even policy...

...The White House and even the newly aware media is now pursuing the one remaining piece of the puzzle: Who was creating and then putting in place policies supposedly vetted by the president, and who else used the “autopen” found on so many documents? Was it Mike Donilon, who is cited by a recent piece in the Times of London? Or long-time adviser Anita Dunn? We just don’t know.

This is not just a fishing expedition. The public must know if some of Biden’s rules and policies were executed without his knowledge or consent. There is a possibility that Congress could challenge the legality of measures adopted by presidential aides or officials, rather than the country’s chief executive.




Complete text: Republicans scrutinize Biden's pardons and autopen use


My guess is that whoever was running the nation will do their level-best to keep it a secret.

After Obama left office he was taped saying something to the idea of having another term by sitting at home in sweat pants and using ear phones of some sort to direct somebody else to do as he tells them. I don't remember his exact words but it was to that effect. Since so many people around Biden were ex Obama people maybe that's who it's been.
 
Indeed, being an incurious, unquestioning, passive, uncritical, docile, uninquisitive sheep is the best play here. As always, the usual suspects can be counted upon to advocate for no information over information…darkness over light.

Personally, I prefer the good old days…when “enlightened” had the word “light” in it.
If you think congressional investigation is about shedding light on anything you are being naive.

It's purely grandstanding and attention-seeking. Which I don't condone.

Now, Your next response will be whataboutism in order for you to call me a hypocrite or whatever so don't bother so I don't have to yer mom a hypocrite.
 
I have baseless theories too. And they are equally impossible to prove. Let's waste everyone's time and investigate those as well.
Just because I hate people as much as Zam does.

What hate?

Americans have a right to have that question answered, no?

Nothing hateful about that.

And if it was "sharp as a tack" Joe Biden, his supporters should be delighted to have this investigated. The only reason they would have to be against it is if they suspect he may have not been running the show.

No worries - It's all good.
 
What hate?

Americans have a right to have that question answered, no?

Nothing hateful about that.

And if it was "sharp as a tack" Joe Biden, his supporters should be delighted to have this investigated. The only reason they would have to be against it is if they suspect he may have not been running the show.

No worries - It's all good.
You clearly hate Democrats.
 
No. I disagree with many of the policies of the Democrat Party.

That is not the same thing.

Sometimes I disagree with family members, that doesn't mean I hate them.

You either understand that, or something is preventing you from understanding that.
Tell yourself whatever you want, but your hatred for Democrats is crystal clear.
 
If you think congressional investigation is about shedding light on anything you are being naive.

It's purely grandstanding and attention-seeking. Which I don't condone.

Now, Your next response will be whataboutism in order for you to call me a hypocrite or whatever so don't bother so I don't have to yer mom a hypocrite.
Yep. Congressional investigations are ALWAYS grandstanding and dog & pony shows. And you made no such objections in cases when it suited your hardwired fundamentalist DNC faith. So…yes…you are advocating for non-information, non-investigation, and darkness…because… (D).
I’m not calling anyone a “hypocrite” here. I am merely noting advocacy for concealment and inaction…for keeping things quiet. Everything is subverted to party.
 
Yep. Congressional investigations are ALWAYS grandstanding and dog & pony shows. And you made no such objections in cases when it suited your hardwired fundamentalist DNC faith. So…yes…you are advocating for non-information, non-investigation, and darkness…because… (D).
I’m not calling anyone a “hypocrite” here. I am merely noting advocacy for concealment and inaction…for keeping things quiet. Everything is subverted to party.
What will it prove? Absolutely nothing
What changes will be made because of it? Absolute none.

It's just a huge waste of f*cking time. They will ask moronic questions and take things out of context, so Fox News can entertain the boomers like professional wrestling entertains teenagers.
 
What will it prove? Absolutely nothing
What changes will be made because of it? Absolute none.

It's just a huge waste of f*cking time. They will ask moronic questions and take things out of context, so Fox News can entertain the boomers like professional wrestling entertains teenagers.
All one need do is take a look at the report issued by Comer and Jordan to see that they spent two years and millions of dollars in an attempt to distract from anything positive Biden was doing. They found no indictable criminal or corrupt acts. No articles of impeachment...instead we have half truths and innuendo. They had 20 shell corporations!!! Meanwhile the Trump family has 500 shell companies.

At the same time look at their comments about the Mueller investigation...that should never have happened...right?
 
What will it prove? Absolutely nothing
What changes will be made because of it? Absolute none.

It's just a huge waste of f*cking time. They will ask moronic questions and take things out of context, so Fox News can entertain the boomers like professional wrestling entertains teenagers.

People who do not wish truth to be known will always insist any effort to do so is a waste of time and money.

Maybe it will be. Maybe it won't be. Investigated it should be.
 
No. I disagree with many of the policies of the Democrat Party.

That is not the same thing.

Sometimes I disagree with family members, that doesn't mean I hate them.

You either understand that, or something is preventing you from understanding that.
You cheering on Biden's cancer?...Ass holes like you are no doubt
 
You are a fool if you believe congress is going to tell you the truth.

I, as a rule, seldom if ever expect to get truth from a politician. They are prone to lie when it suits them. Faith placed in politicians is faith wasted.

That does not mean I don't think anything should ever be investigated. Quite often, uncomfortable truths are revealed during a course of an investigation, sometimes unintentionally.

Let the chips fall where they may. There is nothing to fear.
 
You cheering on Biden's cancer?...Ass holes like you are no doubt

You seem to have comprehension issues.

There is nothing in this thread about anyone having cancer, and you certainly will not be able to produce a post from me "cheering on cancer" in anyone.

It's just a lie you make up because you can't or won't discuss the actual topic. It makes you look bad, even if you don't know it.

If you insist on doing this to yourself, I'll stand aside and watch.
 
You seem to have comprehension issues.

There is nothing in this thread about anyone having cancer, and you certainly will not be able to produce a post from me "cheering on cancer" in anyone.

It's just a lie you make up because you can't or won't discuss the actual topic. It makes you look bad, even if you don't know it.

If you insist on doing this to yourself, I'll stand aside and watch.
Nah, your a fraud.Your hatred of Joe Biden is quite obvious, he is good man.You?...No so good
 
Back
Top