You finally caught up. Awesome...
...Such a decision is not unprecedented. In the aftermath of the 2008 Mumbai attacks, a series of shootings and bombings that resulted in 164 people being killed and more than 300 others wounded, India’s Muslim community refused to bury the nine assailants,
arguing that the “people who committed this heinous crime cannot be called Muslim.”
Boston’s Muslim community came to a similar conclusion following the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, after which an imam at the Islamic Institute of Boston
said he would not be willing to hold a funeral for one of the attackers because “this is a person who deliberately killed people. … He already left the fold of Islam by doing that.”
Following the deadly attack on a church in the French town of Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray last July, which resulted in the death of a priest, the town’s Muslim community also refused to be involved with the assailant’s burial. The leader of the local mosque
told Le Monde, “We will not sully Islam with this person. We will not participate in the funeral or the burial.”...
https://www.theatlantic.com/interna...using-to-bury-the-manchester-attacker/528648/
