New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Here....have another pleasant read, while you pat yourself on the shoulder

Barbella

Senator
for "fighting for your freedom".

"Late-term abortion is not primarily third trimester abortion. Third trimester abortions, from 28 weeks’ gestation to full term, number about 600 a year and are performed for medical emergency reasons. ”Late-term abortions” are primarily SECOND-trimester abortions that take place in the 21st through 27th week gestation lmp of pregnancy, when – on an average basis – more than half of the infants are positively viable (that is, if they were to be born extremely prematurely at that point due to miscarriage, they could and would survive to adulthood), and all of the infants are potentially viable … even at 22 weeks gestation (i.e. the rate of viability at 22 weeks lmp is 20%, one in five). The number of late-term second-trimester abortions in the United States, of potentially and positively viable babies, is over 20,000 per year. Almost ALL of them (over 95%) are aborted – that is, terminated – for elective reasons: They are not medically-necessary abortions.

Late-term second-trimester elective abortions of over 20,000 viable and potentially-viable infants a year are performed by a method known in the medical field as the “classical method”, that is, D&E Dilation and Evacuation, which comprises shredding the limbs and torso of the child inside the womb with a toothed instrument, crushing his or her head, and after extracting a majority of infant fetal parts through her mother’s birth canal, suctioning the rest out and scraping the lining of the uterus. Late-term D&E should properly be called the Dismemberment Abortion method.

Late-term D&E Dismemberment Abortion is a distinctly more painful method of abortion to the child than was the currently-banned D&X Partial Birth Abortion method. D&E Dismemberment Abortion is also more brutal, primitive and ghastly in its medical execution procedure (quite unbelievably so) than was the horrific D&X Partial Birth Abortion method. D&X was often labelled infanticide (famously so by the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan), and is alluded to in similar direct language in the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. D&E Dismemberment Abortion is equally comparable to D&X Partial Birth Abortion in terms of the gestation age of the infants killed and in its callous brutality, and it merits being equally designated as raw infanticide.


http://savingviableinfants.com/2011/03/23/restating-late-term-abortion-facts-and-misperceptions/
 
The number is now over 90% of Downs Syndrome babies aborted.....for being Downs Syndrome babies.

Anyone can grab their phonebook, look over the ads for abortion clinics and see for themselves all the ads for abortion "up to 24 weeks"..."Up to 18" "up to 26 weeks."

But yeah, it's all so rare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jen

Yup.

In every state in the union I'm sure we could find ads like that one.

And did you catch the offer for financial counseling?? That means they'll help you obtain a loan for the abortion.

I just said it on the other thread. People claim late term abortion only occurs because of women's health issues or fetal health issues. But all these clinics who DON'T have ob/gyn staff to care for women in a health crisis, and DON'T have neonatal units...or docs that have admitting privileges even, advertise for this very rare procedure that's only performed "for the life of the mother".
Sure.
 
It is a fact that many Liberals approve of infanticide. They won't come out and say it, but anyone who still claims that abortion should be legal after 20 weeks (without a very good reason to abort) is okay with infanticide. The dishonesty about it doesn't change what it is and what they support.
 
The number is now over 90% of Downs Syndrome babies aborted.....for being Downs Syndrome babies.

Anyone can grab their phonebook, look over the ads for abortion clinics and see for themselves all the ads for abortion "up to 24 weeks"..."Up to 18" "up to 26 weeks."

But yeah, it's all so rare.

That's just sickening. But many libs are just fine with it.
 
It is a fact that many Liberals approve of infanticide. They won't come out and say it, but anyone who still claims that abortion should be legal after 20 weeks (without a very good reason to abort) is okay with infanticide. The dishonesty about it doesn't change what it is and what they support.

They're okay with killing off developing females.. that's not very feminist.

They're also okay with killing off developing homosexuals, one could say that's homophobic.

Finally, they're fine with killing off developing black children, which we all know is racist.

For those who are for abortion beyond the law (and questionably even before if you look at the science of it), they are easily qualified as everything they claim to fight against.
 
Name a Republican passed or supported bill on abortion...

that would inconvenience a wealthy woman.


If you can't....explain why "pro-lifers" aren't that concerned with the RICH having a right to abortion.
 
Name a Republican passed or supported bill on abortion...

that would inconvenience a wealthy woman.

If you can't....explain why "pro-lifers" aren't that concerned with the RICH having a right to abortion.

What does that have to do with the contents of the top post, exactly?
 
Better read the top post again. It has NOTHING to do with wealth or poverty.


It had to do with the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, right?

Okay....did the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 stop wealthy women from getting a late-term abortion? if so....how?
 
Nothing, of course, but Gordon has posted that comment on three other threads. Apparently, it's the quote he's been assigned for his activities on the board today...


No, it's just a good way to show that "pro-lifers" ....don't really care about the "unborn"...

IF you have enough money.
 
Nothing, of course, but Gordon has posted that comment on three other threads. Apparently, it's the quote he's been assigned for his activities on the board today...

LOLOLOLOLOLOL! How cute.....he finds something that sounds good to him, and sticks with it....

Quaint. :-D
 
It had to do with the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, right?

Okay....did the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 stop wealthy women from getting a late-term abortion? if so....how?


I don't know.

I DO know that having tons of money allows some women to take more lavish vacations than their poorer "sisters"....usually they have nicer clothes, too....better homes and cars....more jewelry....

You get the gist, I hope?
 
Name a Republican passed or supported bill on abortion...

that would inconvenience a wealthy woman.


If you can't....explain why "pro-lifers" aren't that concerned with the RICH having a right to abortion.

Um I would..

Why are you claiming to know what I think?
 
Not a distraction, simply a fact.

In a "coincidence" the Party of the Wealthy JUST HAPPENS to never pass any abortion law that would effect wealthy women.

Just the poor ones.
 
A fetus born between 21 and 27 weeks is not viable without millions of dollars of medical intervention and, often times, with life lasting medical conditions to deal with.

Not sure who wrote this article or where they are getting their information, but the information is mis leading at best.

I know this because I bore two children at 24 weeks gestation.

I speak from real life experience.
 
Back
Top