New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Hillary 2016 Strategy: Pimp "War on Women"

MrMike

MrMike

Bless you all
Do any of you believe it will really work for Hillary? I think only the most devout feminists will embrace that crap but then again... Lib's tend to fall for a lot of emotional BS.

457722084.jpg


IT BEGINS: HILLARY RESTARTS WAR ON WOMEN

While the political world continues to fixate on the upcoming November elections, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) has cast her gaze firmly upon 2016, and she’s already making the case for why we need a mighty feminist warrior in the White House: There’s a dangerous “war on women.”


It begins: Hillary restarts War on Women | Human Events
 
Democrats are going crazy with threats to voters. Here is a flyer for (D) Kay Hagan using a lynching background

flyer.jpg


Like I've said before, between the two major parties, it's always the Democrats who claim to be "above" things in politics. That's why it's important to remind PJ Democrats that it's a political party, and runs the exact same way as the GOP does. They both are filled with horrible excuses for logic on their members' campaign runs.

And trust me, there will be no telling of Hagan to stop this by the head trust in DC.. if anything, it will be encouraged.

And before you try to say it's not Hagan.. please, don't insult anyone's intelligence and pretend that Super PACs are innocent.
 
MrMike said:
Do any of you believe it will really work for Hillary? I think only the most devout feminists will embrace that crap but then again... Lib's tend to fall for a lot of emotional BS.

457722084.jpg


IT BEGINS: HILLARY RESTARTS WAR ON WOMEN

While the political world continues to fixate on the upcoming November elections, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) has cast her gaze firmly upon 2016, and she’s already making the case for why we need a mighty feminist warrior in the White House: There’s a dangerous “war on women.”


It begins: Hillary restarts War on Women | Human Events
Click to expand...

It will keep her base because they already believe it's true.
The pimping of the war on women won't win her any votes from the independents or the right because it's built on a very thin foundation......really, a nonexistent foundation.
 
Grown women are not stupid.The middle aged women who blather the WOW stuff know it's BS, but it's a good talking point that has served the left well. But young women are quite naive and much more about the here and now, and they're in that place where they're fresh from the teen years where we're all just jonesing for a chance to stand up to our "oppressors", and yet qualified to vote.
It's up to the Republican candidates whether this tactic will be successful for Hillary or not. The reason it's ever been successful for the left is because when the conservatives expose the BS, they tend to preach to the choir and leave it at that. It's the same thing they do when they discuss the way the left exploits poor people and struggling families. They don't go to these people and show them the reality of what the "help" these candidates are offering really translates to.

The republican candidates can't get caught up in their personal beliefs about things. Instead they would have to go to the voters most vulnerable to the War On Women claptrap and dissect the reality of what these socalled "pro-woman, pro-family" points of view from the left really involve.
But they won't.

The one thing they will have going for them by 2016 is that the birth control will have been free for two years and many women will have realized that this big "gift" didn't pay out at all like Obama promised it would. The one time savings for the free LARCs will be tantamount to eaten bread and the monthly savings for daily used products will not be positively affecting their budgets at all like he said it would. But will Hilary's opponents bring it up?
 
MrMike said:
Do any of you believe it will really work for Hillary? I think only the most devout feminists will embrace that crap but then again... Lib's tend to fall for a lot of emotional BS.

457722084.jpg


IT BEGINS: HILLARY RESTARTS WAR ON WOMEN

While the political world continues to fixate on the upcoming November elections, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) has cast her gaze firmly upon 2016, and she’s already making the case for why we need a mighty feminist warrior in the White House: There’s a dangerous “war on women.”


It begins: Hillary restarts War on Women | Human Events
Click to expand...
I can already see and hear posters just like you all over the internet talking about her clothes,her shoes,her thighs,her ass,her face,her makeup,the amount it costs to get her hair done etc. etc. You guys just can't help yourselves. You guys are gonna drive women who've never voted before to the polls. Romney got 44% of the female vote. You guys are drive some of them into the Hillary camp. Romney got 56% of the over-65 vote and 59% of the white vote and you guys are gonna drive some of them into the Hillary camp too.
 
You might be onto something and in one way, I hope so. You know, Shrillary really is that lip-stick on a pig kind of gal so maybe that will get out the "homely" vote?

btw: that means she should save money on the "looks" stuff (it won't help)

:)

soonverysoon.jpg



bdtex said:
I can already see and hear posters just like you all over the internet talking about her clothes,her shoes,her thighs,her ass,her face,her makeup,the amount it costs to get her hair done etc. etc. You guys just can't help yourselves. You guys are gonna drive women who've never voted before to the polls. Romney got 44% of the female vote. You guys are drive some of them into the Hillary camp. Romney got 56% of the over-65 vote and 59% of the white vote and you guys are gonna drive some of them into the Hillary camp too.
Click to expand...
 
The only war on women is the one being perpetuated by her and her ilk.

The fools that buy into it are the perfect "useful idiots" so embraced by the Communists and Socialists.

Libs are all about "emotions" and how things make them "feel". Facts are reality are irrelevant.
MrMike said:
Do any of you believe it will really work for Hillary? I think only the most devout feminists will embrace that crap but then again... Lib's tend to fall for a lot of emotional BS.

457722084.jpg


IT BEGINS: HILLARY RESTARTS WAR ON WOMEN

While the political world continues to fixate on the upcoming November elections, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) has cast her gaze firmly upon 2016, and she’s already making the case for why we need a mighty feminist warrior in the White House: There’s a dangerous “war on women.”


It begins: Hillary restarts War on Women | Human Events
Click to expand...
 
That's a very flattering pic of Shrilldebeast!
MrMike said:
You might be onto something and in one way, I hope so. You know, Shrillary really is that lip-stick on a pig kind of gal so maybe that will get out the "homely" vote?

btw: that means she should save money on the "looks" stuff (it won't help)

:)

soonverysoon.jpg
Click to expand...
 
bdtex said:
I can already see and hear posters just like you all over the internet talking about her clothes,her shoes,her thighs,her ass,her face,her makeup,the amount it costs to get her hair done etc. etc. You guys just can't help yourselves. You guys are gonna drive women who've never voted before to the polls. Romney got 44% of the female vote. You guys are drive some of them into the Hillary camp. Romney got 56% of the over-65 vote and 59% of the white vote and you guys are gonna drive some of them into the Hillary camp too.
Click to expand...

Oh...you mean like you libs do in regards to Palin, Bachman, etc?
 
MrMike said:
According to Libs...that's different!

LOL @ Libpocrisy
Click to expand...
If you guys think "Both sides do it" is gonna work for you then please proceed. I know I don't have to say please because y'all are gonna do it anyway and it's gonna cost you.
 
MrMike said:
Do any of you believe it will really work for Hillary? I think only the most devout feminists will embrace that crap but then again... Lib's tend to fall for a lot of emotional BS.

457722084.jpg


IT BEGINS: HILLARY RESTARTS WAR ON WOMEN

While the political world continues to fixate on the upcoming November elections, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) has cast her gaze firmly upon 2016, and she’s already making the case for why we need a mighty feminist warrior in the White House: There’s a dangerous “war on women.”


It begins: Hillary restarts War on Women | Human Events
Click to expand...
I guess we can file this next to the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy"
 
I don't think it will play out quite like you think. We will see.

bdtex said:
If you guys think "Both sides do it" is gonna work for you then please proceed. I know I don't have to say please because y'all are gonna do it anyway and it's gonna cost you.
Click to expand...
 
bdtex said:
If you guys think "Both sides do it" is gonna work for you then please proceed. I know I don't have to say please because y'all are gonna do it anyway and it's gonna cost you.
Click to expand...

Still waiting for you to explain how it's different when it comes to your heroine.

The left eviscerates Conservative females, both in the public and private arena, on every little thing.

How is it so different when it comes to Hillary?
 
bdtex said:
I can already see and hear posters just like you all over the internet talking about her clothes,her shoes,her thighs,her ass,her face,her makeup,the amount it costs to get her hair done etc. etc. You guys just can't help yourselves. You guys are gonna drive women who've never voted before to the polls. Romney got 44% of the female vote. You guys are drive some of them into the Hillary camp. Romney got 56% of the over-65 vote and 59% of the white vote and you guys are gonna drive some of them into the Hillary camp too.
Click to expand...

I heard she hasn't paid any income tax in 10 years...:p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top