Hillary panicks over SCOTUS pick

[Jen]

Hillary is in a panic over Trump's SCOTUS choice. She tweeted this:
"The next Supreme Court justice could shift the court to the right for decades, with devastating consequences for reproductive rights, health care, workers' rights, and voting rights."

It's not surprising that Hillary doesn't realize that the SCOTUS merely interprets law, it doesn't make law.

It's way past time for Hillary's chickens to come home to roost.

 

[sear]

Hillary panicks over SCOTUS pick

"Hillary panicks" ?

I doubt it.

The Clinton's remain one of the most formidable husband and wife political teams in the U.S. today.
Hillary may be an extremely capable operator. But I'm not sure "panic" is even on her résumé.

 

[marvin martian]

"Hillary panicks" ?

I doubt it.

The Clinton's remain one of the most formidable husband and wife political teams in the U.S. today.
Hillary may be an extremely capable operator. But I'm not sure "panic" is even on her résumé.

How capable need one be to lose every presidential election one runs in, including one that was specifically rigged in her favor?

LOL

 

[RickWA]

How capable need one be to lose every presidential election one runs in, including one that was specifically rigged in her favor?

LOL

Lefties on this board will abide NO critique of a Democrat - even those lefties who feign pragmatism.

 

[sear]

"How capable need one be to lose every presidential election one runs in, including one that was specifically rigged in her favor?

LOL" mm #3

1) Ask McCain.

2) Some reports indicate Russia helped rig the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

BUT !!

All the reports I've read of it indicate Russia rigged it in Trump's favor.

WHY ??

Because Putin's no dummy.
Putin KNEW President HRC would have been a vastly more formidable opponent than President Trump.

a) The Clinton's are a husband and wife team. They function as a team.
Hubby Bill ran for AR governor, and won. She was his first lady.

b) Hubby Bill ran for POTUS & won. She was his first lady AGAIN.

c) She ran for U.S. senator from NY, and won.

d) She sought senate confirmation as secretary of State, and won.

e) She sought the presidency competing against Trump in 2016. She was ahead in the polls before she announced. She maintained her lead for years, until election day.
AND !!
Hillary WON the vote!
HRC was the popular choice.

BUT !!

As you well know, the Republicans have not put a man in the white house in the new millennium via majority vote.

 

[Capitalist]

Hillary WON the vote!
HRC was the popular choice.

BUT !!

As you well know, the Republicans have not put a man in the white house in the new millennium via majority vote.

What must be said or done to convince you electing a president by popular vote is a terrible idea?

 

[Jen]

1) Ask McCain.

2) Some reports indicate Russia helped rig the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

BUT !!

All the reports I've read of it indicate Russia rigged it in Trump's favor.

WHY ??

Because Putin's no dummy.
Putin KNEW President HRC would have been a vastly more formidable opponent than President Trump.

a) The Clinton's are a husband and wife team. They function as a team.
Hubby Bill ran for AR governor, and won. She was his first lady.

b) Hubby Bill ran for POTUS & won. She was his first lady AGAIN.

c) She ran for U.S. senator from NY, and won.

d) She sought senate confirmation as secretary of State, and won.

e) She sought the presidency competing against Trump in 2016. She was ahead in the polls before she announced. She maintained her lead for years, until election day.
AND !!
Hillary WON the vote!
HRC was the popular choice.

BUT !!

As you well know, the Republicans have not put a man in the white house in the new millennium via majority vote.

Oh Lordy...................

What a lonnnng whine!

 

[Drumcollie]

"Hillary panicks" ?

I doubt it.

The Clinton's remain one of the most formidable husband and wife political teams in the U.S. today.
Hillary may be an extremely capable operator. But I'm not sure "panic" is even on her résumé.

I agree she is so old that by the time panic sets in she probably wont be here considering the health issues we saw during the election process.

 

[Drumcollie]

1) Ask McCain.

2) Some reports indicate Russia helped rig the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

BUT !!

All the reports I've read of it indicate Russia rigged it in Trump's favor.

WHY ??

Because Putin's no dummy.
Putin KNEW President HRC would have been a vastly more formidable opponent than President Trump.

a) The Clinton's are a husband and wife team. They function as a team.
Hubby Bill ran for AR governor, and won. She was his first lady.

b) Hubby Bill ran for POTUS & won. She was his first lady AGAIN.

c) She ran for U.S. senator from NY, and won.

d) She sought senate confirmation as secretary of State, and won.

e) She sought the presidency competing against Trump in 2016. She was ahead in the polls before she announced. She maintained her lead for years, until election day.
AND !!
Hillary WON the vote!
HRC was the popular choice.

BUT !!

As you well know, the Republicans have not put a man in the white house in the new millennium via majority vote.

As you well know, The Democrats have not put in a man or woman in the White House in the new millennium via legal voters.

How is the Trump impeachment thingy working out?

 

[marvin martian]

1) Ask McCain.

Yes, McCain was also a multiple loser in presidential elections.

2) Some reports indicate Russia helped rig the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

I've heard this, too, but until there's proof it's a conspiracy theory on par with Bigfoot.

 

[Drumcollie]

"Hillary panicks" ?

I doubt it.
But I'm not sure "panic" is even on her résumé.

Hillary never panicked over Benghazi until she was questioned about it before Congress.

 

[middleview]

1) Ask McCain.

2) Some reports indicate Russia helped rig the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

BUT !!

All the reports I've read of it indicate Russia rigged it in Trump's favor.

WHY ??

Because Putin's no dummy.
Putin KNEW President HRC would have been a vastly more formidable opponent than President Trump.

a) The Clinton's are a husband and wife team. They function as a team.
Hubby Bill ran for AR governor, and won. She was his first lady.

b) Hubby Bill ran for POTUS & won. She was his first lady AGAIN.

c) She ran for U.S. senator from NY, and won.

d) She sought senate confirmation as secretary of State, and won.

e) She sought the presidency competing against Trump in 2016. She was ahead in the polls before she announced. She maintained her lead for years, until election day.
AND !!
Hillary WON the vote!
HRC was the popular choice.

BUT !!

As you well know, the Republicans have not put a man in the white house in the new millennium via majority vote.

In 2004 Bush won the popular vote.

 

[marvin martian]

In 2004 Bush won the popular vote.

I think what he meant to say is that the Democrats haven't accepted the results of an election they didn't win since the new millennium, which is true.

 

[sear]

"Hillary never panicked over Benghazi until she was questioned about it before Congress." Dc #11

panic (pàn´îk) noun
A sudden, overpowering terror

verb, transitive & intransitive
panicked, panicking, panics
To affect or be affected with panic. See synonyms at frighten.

[From French panique, terrified, from Greek Panikos, of Pan (a source of terror, as in flocks or herds), groundless (used of fear), from Pan, Pan. See Pan.]
- pan´icky adjective

Excerpted from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition © 1996 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from INSO Corporation; further reproduction and distribution in accordance with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved.

Reports indicated HRC responded to the interrogation for 11 hours.
No report I read of it used the word "panic" to describe her testimony.

"In 2004 Bush won the popular vote." mv #13

I vividly remember.

"I earned capital in the campaign, political capital. And now I intend to spend it." U.S. President Bush (younger) November 4, 2004

HOWEVER !!

Your assertion does not refute my observation, which was:

"As you well know, the Republicans have not put a man in the white house in the new millennium via majority vote." s

By 2005, U.S. President Bush (younger) already had 4 years tenure.
So that electoral win did not put Bush in the White House.
It put Bush BACK in the White House, where he'd already been.

BUT !!

Governor Bush (R-TX) lost the Y2K vote to AlGore, just as I originally indicated.

 

[sear]

"I think" mm #14

- piffle -

 

[EatTheRich]

Hillary is in a panic over Trump's SCOTUS choice. She tweeted this:
"The next Supreme Court justice could shift the court to the right for decades, with devastating consequences for reproductive rights, health care, workers' rights, and voting rights."

It's not surprising that Hillary doesn't realize that the SCOTUS merely interprets law, it doesn't make law.

It's way past time for Hillary's chickens to come home to roost.

Honest justices merely interpret law. Political hacks appointed by corrupt would-be dictators twist the law to get a desired outcome.

 

[EatTheRich]

As you well know, The Democrats have not put in a man or woman in the White House in the new millennium via legal voters.

How is the Trump impeachment thingy working out?

Unless you count Obama.

 

[Hmmmm]

In 2004 Bush won the popular vote.

But that isn't the vote that put him in the White House. It kept him there and he had all of the "put a boot in your ass" political correctness and hype going for him.

 

[Jen]

Honest justices merely interpret law. Political hacks appointed by corrupt would-be dictators twist the law to get a desired outcome.

And that is precisely why nobody in their right mind would want Hillary to EVER appoint a justice.

 

[EatTheRich]

And that is precisely why nobody in their right mind would want Hillary to EVER appoint a justice.

Much less Trump.