HA! I suppose I should get bored of the Republican spin technique, because it's so damned predictable. But when they have to go this far out into silly territory to use it, I have to admit, I find it adorable.
Here's a recap of how this works: Republicans don't play defense. So, if a Republican is attacked, he will immediately turn around the accusation and say the real guilty person is the Democrat. Thus, if the Democrats are pointing out the "war on women" that Romney's taking part in, Romney will spin that around and say that the real war on women is being waged by Obama. And it doesn't matter how creative he needs to be to make that claim -- even if it involves citing some criticisms of Ann Romney by some TV personality who is unaffiliated with Obama. Romney knows his supporters aren't typically bright, so he doesn't need to be convincing when he spins the accusation around. It needn't even be plausible. He just needs to find something to let the hateful hordes go back on the attack.
Thus, if Romney's attacked for his cruel treatment of the family dog, then Obama MUST be the one with the real dog problem. It's the most predictable thing in the world. The moment the story about Romney abusing his pet became news, anyone with a bit of sense KNEW there'd be an inevitable attempt by the right-wing media to portray Obama as the REAL dog abuser. Only this time they had to reach so far to find it that they're literally taking Obama to task for eating local cuisine when he was a little kid. It's hilarious.
The only down side to the ridiculous commitment of the Republicans to this turn-about technique is that it makes political satire obsolete. Satire relies on hyperbole, and it's hard to come up with any way to exaggerate the silliness of the GOP any more than they've already done.