HopeHeads Silent as Obama Directs 10K NATO Expeditionary Force to the Russian Front

[worldlymrb]

Tell me lefty, what is Baraq's plan if the 10,000 man NATO Expeditionary Force gets wiped out defending a Ukrainian govt who overthrew a democraticly elected govt just 10 months ago?

Nato Building 10,000-Strong Force to Counter Russia over Ukraine
www.ibtimes.co.uk › Society › Politics

4 days ago - Ukrainian army servicemen around an armoured vehicle are seen through dust raised by passing ...

NATO Troops in Ukraine, Claim Rebels | News | teleSUR
www.telesurtv.net/.../NATO-Troops-in-U...

1 day ago - NATO Troops in Ukraine, Claim Rebels ...of 10,000 troops from seven NATO member states to support ...
-----------------------------------

YOU JUST MIGHT WANTED TO KNOW WHAT USA'S OBLIGATION TO THE NATO ALLIANCE IS.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

I wasn't aware that the President of the United States is in complete control of NATO military. When did that start?

 

[worldlymrb]

I wasn't aware that the President of the United States is in complete control of NATO military. When did that start?

We're you under the assumption that the alliance can march off to war w/o the consent of the one superpower who makes up 80% of the military force.?

Are you also aware that if the NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE comes under attack, that it will be considered an attack on the USA?

Are you ready to go to war against Russia to defend a govt that overthru a democraticly elected govt just a few months ago?

 

[Spamature]

We're you under the assumption that the alliance can march off to war w/o the consent of the one superpower who makes up 80% of the military force.?

Are you also aware that if the NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE comes under attack, that it will be considered an attack on the USA?

Are you ready to go to war against Russia to defend a govt that overthru a democraticly elected govt just a few months ago?

I thought it was the right wingers that were all up in arms over inaction in Ukraine. Why did you not address your post to them ?

 

[middleview]

Tell me lefty, what is Baraq's plan if the 10,000 man NATO Expeditionary Force gets wiped out defending a Ukrainian govt who overthrew a democraticly elected govt just 10 months ago?

Nato Building 10,000-Strong Force to Counter Russia over Ukraine
www.ibtimes.co.uk › Society › Politics

4 days ago - Ukrainian army servicemen around an armoured vehicle are seen through dust raised by passing ...

NATO Troops in Ukraine, Claim Rebels | News | teleSUR
www.telesurtv.net/.../NATO-Troops-in-U...

1 day ago - NATO Troops in Ukraine, Claim Rebels ...of 10,000 troops from seven NATO member states to support ...
-----------------------------------

YOU JUST MIGHT WANTED TO KNOW WHAT USA'S OBLIGATION TO THE NATO ALLIANCE IS.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO

Your headline is that Obama directed 10k Nato troops to be deployed. I'm thinking that is simply more bullshit from you.....since there is no evidence that the US is involved.

 

[middleview]

We're you under the assumption that the alliance can march off to war w/o the consent of the one superpower who makes up 80% of the military force.?

Are you also aware that if the NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE comes under attack, that it will be considered an attack on the USA?

Are you ready to go to war against Russia to defend a govt that overthru a democraticly elected govt just a few months ago?

So if any country, oh....say Argentina, were to attack a Nato member's troops, then the US would be obliged to go to war in some God forsaken place like the Falklands?

 

[worldlymrb]

..since there is no evidence that the US is involved.

NEWS FLASH.. IF THE NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE IS ATTACKED, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AS AN ATTACKED ON THE USA AS WE ARE OBLIGATED BY TREATY!!!!!

So what is Obama's plan if the Alliance is attacked? I'd love to hear it.

 

[worldlymrb]

So if any country, oh....say Argentina, were to attack a Nato member's troops, then the US would be obliged to go to war in some God forsaken place like the Falklands?

Yes we are/were obliged.

Thatcher declined invoking NATO. However, NATO did embargo Argentina.

SO, if the NATO ALLIANCE EXPEDITIONARY FORCE is wiped out on the Russian Front, does HOPE/CHANGE have any assurance from the NATO ALLIANCE that USA (which is 80% NATO), will be exempt from war with Russia?

BTW: Any guesses on how the OBAMA appointed ambassador to NATO voted on sending the provocative EXPEDITIONARY FORCE?

And shouldn't the crony Nobel Peace Laureate, be exhausting all diplomatic efforts before provoking Russia with a NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE on their door step?

 

[worldlymrb]

I thought it was the right wingers that were all up in arms over inaction in Ukraine. Why did you not address your post to them ?

And they're going to get their war, so what's your problem?

It's not like you or any other crony progressive is going to to do anything to stop the ALLIANCE from a provocative deployment of a Expeditionary Force on Putin's doorstep.

Only Obama can stop the provocative deployment of the NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE on Putin's border and so far, he's only voted present.

 

[middleview]

And they're going to get their war, so what's your problem?

It's not like you or any other crony progressive is going to to do anything to stop the ALLIANCE from a provocative deployment of a Expeditionary Force on Putin's doorstep.

Only Obama can stop the provocative deployment of the NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE on Putin's border and so far, he's only voted present.

just like Putin could stop the provocative deployment of Russian forces into Ukrainian territory. The Russian economy has already seen a rapid departure of capital....$200b so far. I wonder how much longer Putin can pretend he isn't hurting the average Russian.

 

[middleview]

NEWS FLASH.. IF THE NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE IS ATTACKED, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AS AN ATTACKED ON THE USA AS WE ARE OBLIGATED BY TREATY!!!!!

So what is Obama's plan if the Alliance is attacked? I'd love to hear it.

1. An attack on Nato forces that are on the territory of a non-Nato member is not included in the treaty as a reason for the US to become involved.
2. An attack by Russian forces inside of Ukrainian territory should be considered an act of war against the 7 nations who are putting troops into Ukraine. Do you think Putin wants a war with the UK or the other 6 countries?

I'm not sure that Obama needs a plan....but I think he would want to help our Nato allies.

 

[MrMike]

Our current POTUS isn't in charge of anything or accountable for anything either.

I wasn't aware that the President of the United States is in complete control of NATO military. When did that start?

 

[Arkady]

Tell me lefty, what is Baraq's plan if the 10,000 man NATO Expeditionary Force gets wiped out defending a Ukrainian govt who overthrew a democraticly elected govt just 10 months ago?

Nato Building 10,000-Strong Force to Counter Russia over Ukraine
www.ibtimes.co.uk › Society › Politics

4 days ago - Ukrainian army servicemen around an armoured vehicle are seen through dust raised by passing ...

NATO Troops in Ukraine, Claim Rebels | News | teleSUR
www.telesurtv.net/.../NATO-Troops-in-U...

1 day ago - NATO Troops in Ukraine, Claim Rebels ...of 10,000 troops from seven NATO member states to support ...
-----------------------------------

YOU JUST MIGHT WANTED TO KNOW WHAT USA'S OBLIGATION TO THE NATO ALLIANCE IS.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO

Baraq? You mean the 15th century Khan of the Golden Horde? What does he have to do with this?

 

[middleview]

Our current POTUS isn't in charge of anything or accountable for anything either.

Really? So who ordered the air strikes on ISIS?

 

[MrMike]

Tiger Woods!

Really? So who ordered the air strikes on ISIS?

 

[worldlymrb]

1. An attack on Nato forces that are on the territory of a non-Nato member is not included in the treaty as a reason for the US to become involved.
2. An attack by Russian forces inside of Ukrainian territory should be considered an act of war against the 7 nations who are putting troops into Ukraine. Do you think Putin wants a war with the UK or the other 6 countries?

I'm not sure that Obama needs a plan....but I think he would want to help our Nato allies.

So what is Obama's plan if the NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE is attacked?

Will Hope/Change throw NATO under the bus?

 

[worldlymrb]

1. An attack on Nato forces that are on the territory of a non-Nato member is not included in the treaty as a reason for the US to become involved.
2. An attack by Russian forces inside of Ukrainian territory should be considered an act of war against the 7 nations who are putting troops into Ukraine. Do you think Putin wants a war with the UK or the other 6 countries?

I'm not sure that Obama needs a plan....but I think he would want to help our Nato allies.

If the 7 EU countries want to send a coalition of the willing to defend IMF loans to Ukraine, then fine.. JUST DONT INVOKE NATO!

By invoke NATO, means the NATO command/control/supply infrastructure is being used. Which means all NATO member countries are legitimate military targets.

Since USA is 80% NATO. Obama could easily order NATO not to send a Expeditionary Force which will provoke Russia and possibly start WW3.

BTW: Since this is officially a NATO EXPEDITIONARY FORCE, that means this military expedition is 80% fun dedicated by the United States and making us a legal military target.

 

[middleview]

If the 7 EU countries want to send a coalition of the willing to defend IMF loans to Ukraine, then fine.. JUST DONT INVOKE NATO!

By invoke NATO, means the NATO command/control/supply infrastructure is being used. Which means all NATO member countries are legitimate military targets.

Since USA is 80% NATO. Obama could easily order NATO not to send a Expeditionary Force which will provoke Russia and possibly start WW3

Yeah, sure thing....Obama could just order them to do whatever he wanted...so why didn't Bush order Nato to attack Iraq?

 

[worldlymrb]

just like Putin could stop the provocative deployment of Russian forces into Ukrainian territory.

Are you willing to go war to stop him?

If not, maybe you best stand up and ask why your crony Nobel Peace Laureate is provoking Russia and allowing NATO to deploy a military expedition on Putin's doorstep?

 

[afella]

Tell me lefty, what is Baraq's plan if the 10,000 man NATO Expeditionary Force gets wiped out defending a Ukrainian govt who overthrew a democraticly elected govt just 10 months ago?

Nato Building 10,000-Strong Force to Counter Russia over Ukraine
www.ibtimes.co.uk › Society › Politics

4 days ago - Ukrainian army servicemen around an armoured vehicle are seen through dust raised by passing ...

NATO Troops in Ukraine, Claim Rebels | News | teleSUR
www.telesurtv.net/.../NATO-Troops-in-U...

1 day ago - NATO Troops in Ukraine, Claim Rebels ...of 10,000 troops from seven NATO member states to support ...
-----------------------------------

YOU JUST MIGHT WANTED TO KNOW WHAT USA'S OBLIGATION TO THE NATO ALLIANCE IS.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO

There are no Russian troops in the Ukraine, so this isn't even an issue. Unless you are implying that Russia has invaded the Ukraine, and is essentially in a defacto state of war with Ukraine? Then I suppose it could be an issue. So plain and simple, no Russian troops in the Ukraine means there is no issue, if Russian troops attack after the arrival of supposed NATO troops arrival then we have an issue, which would fall into Russias responsibility not NATO's.