House J6 committee subpoenas Kevin McCarthy plus 4

[JuliefromOhio]

Kevin McCarthy, of California, who engaged in a heated phone call with Mr. Trump during the Capitol violence; Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, who coordinated a plan to try to replace the acting attorney general who had resisted Mr. Trump’s false claims of widespread fraud; Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, who was deeply involved in the effort to fight the election results; Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona, the former leader of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus; and Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama, who has said Mr. Trump has continued to seek an unlawful reinstatement to office for more than a year.

All five have refused requests for voluntary interviews about the roles they played in the buildup to the attack by supporters of the former president who believed his lie of widespread election fraud. The subpoenas come as the committee is ramping up for a series of public hearings in June to reveal its findings. The eight hearings are slated to take place over several weeks beginning June 9, some during prime time in an effort to attract a large television audience.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/12/us/house-subpoenas-jan-6.html

 

[Alinvegas]

Kevin McCarthy, of California, who engaged in a heated phone call with Mr. Trump during the Capitol violence; Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, who coordinated a plan to try to replace the acting attorney general who had resisted Mr. Trump’s false claims of widespread fraud; Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, who was deeply involved in the effort to fight the election results; Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona, the former leader of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus; and Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama, who has said Mr. Trump has continued to seek an unlawful reinstatement to office for more than a year.

All five have refused requests for voluntary interviews about the roles they played in the buildup to the attack by supporters of the former president who believed his lie of widespread election fraud. The subpoenas come as the committee is ramping up for a series of public hearings in June to reveal its findings. The eight hearings are slated to take place over several weeks beginning June 9, some during prime time in an effort to attract a large television audience.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/12/us/house-subpoenas-jan-6.html

It doesn't matter any more now that your side has allowed insurrectionists to march in front of Supreme court justices homes illegally. All's fair in love and war with you guys.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Kevin McCarthy, of California, who engaged in a heated phone call with Mr. Trump during the Capitol violence; Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, who coordinated a plan to try to replace the acting attorney general who had resisted Mr. Trump’s false claims of widespread fraud; Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, who was deeply involved in the effort to fight the election results; Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona, the former leader of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus; and Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama, who has said Mr. Trump has continued to seek an unlawful reinstatement to office for more than a year.

All five have refused requests for voluntary interviews about the roles they played in the buildup to the attack by supporters of the former president who believed his lie of widespread election fraud. The subpoenas come as the committee is ramping up for a series of public hearings in June to reveal its findings. The eight hearings are slated to take place over several weeks beginning June 9, some during prime time in an effort to attract a large television audience.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/12/us/house-subpoenas-jan-6.html

And now we will have GOP congressmen flouting the subpoenas of the very chamber of which they are members. After they refused January 6 Committee requests to voluntarily tell them what they know about January 6.

After all, only one thing is important to them - protecting their cult leader, Donald Trump.

So deplorable.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

It doesn't matter any more now that your side has allowed insurrectionists to march in front of Supreme court justices homes illegally. All's fair in love and war with you guys.

It's past time for McCarthy et al to tell their story to the J6 committee and the public.

It is perfectly legal, our 1st amendment right, to protest in front of anyone's home. In Ohio, protesters demonstrated in front of medical director's home WITH GUNS. I don't think protesting with guns is legal. She feared for the lives of her family and so resigned.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

And now we will have GOP congressmen flouting the subpoenas of the very chamber of which they are members. After they refused January 6 Committee requests to voluntarily tell them what they know about January 6.

After all, only one thing is important to them - protecting their cult leader, Donald Trump.

So deplorable.

Here's hoping that if these 5 don't respond, they'll be held in contempt and referred to the DOJ.

 

[EatTheRich]

It doesn't matter any more now that your side has allowed insurrectionists to march in front of Supreme court justices homes illegally. All's fair in love and war with you guys.

Marching peacefully to petition the government for a redress of grievances is not only legal but constitutionally protected. Not at all the same as trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power by massive violence.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Here's hoping that if these 5 don't respond, they'll be held in contempt and referred to the DOJ.

I’ve pretty much given up on Garland. Trump and his toadies violate the law at will and Garland just twiddles his thumbs. The rule of law is dead.

 

[Colorforms]

Marching peacefully to petition the government for a redress of grievances is not only legal but constitutionally protected. Not at all the same as trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power by massive violence.

Interfering with or attempting to intimidate a justice in the attempt to circumvent justice is a federal crime. If we were a nation of laws these "protestors" who were so violent that one of the justices and his family had to be removed from their home and moved to a secret location, would be facing federal charges.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Interfering with or attempting to intimidate a justice in the attempt to circumvent justice is a federal Crime. If we were a nation of laws these "protestors" who were so violent that one of the justices and his family had to be removed from their home and moved to a secret location, would be facing federal charges.

Review post no. 4 above.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

I’ve pretty much given up on Garland. Trump and his toadies violate the law at will and Garland just twiddles his thumbs. The rule of law is dead.

I think the DOJ will come through. They've hired more attorneys. They're investigating Trump having taken classified material home with him when he left office. Former AG Erik Holder and several judges pointing to Trump's crimes is a strong message to Garland.

 

[middleview]

It doesn't matter any more now that your side has allowed insurrectionists to march in front of Supreme court justices homes illegally. All's fair in love and war with you guys.

What law says protesters may not march in front of the homes of Supreme Court justices?

 

[JuliefromOhio]

Interfering with or attempting to intimidate a justice in the attempt to circumvent justice is a federal Crime. If we were a nation of laws these "protestors" who were so violent that one of the justices and his family had to be removed from their home and moved to a secret location, would be facing federal charges.

Protesting is our 1st amendment right.

 

[Alinvegas]

It's past time for McCarthy et al to tell their story to the J6 committee and the public.

It is perfectly legal, our 1st amendment right, to protest in front of anyone's home. In Ohio, protesters demonstrated in front of medical director's home WITH GUNS. I don't think protesting with guns is legal. She feared for the lives of her family and so resigned.

View attachment 70285

You and all the lefty's on this board are ignorant to the law if you believe that. Check out US Code. What they are doing is illegal. The supreme court justices are not abortion clinic employees.

 

[middleview]

You and all the lefty's on this board are ignorant to the law if you believe that. Check out US Code. What they are doing is illegal. The supreme court justices are not abortion clinic employees.

What section of US Code?

 

[Alinvegas]

Marching peacefully to petition the government for a redress of grievances is not only legal but constitutionally protected. Not at all the same as trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power by massive violence.

You guys can quote the constitution all you want as it doesn't apply here. They are trying to sway a vote by judges, which is illegal. Check out US code. Here it is: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507

 

[Alinvegas]

What section of US Code?

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Colorforms]

Protesting is our 1st amendment right.
View attachment 70286

Abortion clinic employees are not supreme court justices.

Why did anyone have to tell you that?

 

[Spamature]

Kevin McCarthy, of California, who engaged in a heated phone call with Mr. Trump during the Capitol violence; Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, who coordinated a plan to try to replace the acting attorney general who had resisted Mr. Trump’s false claims of widespread fraud; Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, who was deeply involved in the effort to fight the election results; Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona, the former leader of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus; and Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama, who has said Mr. Trump has continued to seek an unlawful reinstatement to office for more than a year.

All five have refused requests for voluntary interviews about the roles they played in the buildup to the attack by supporters of the former president who believed his lie of widespread election fraud. The subpoenas come as the committee is ramping up for a series of public hearings in June to reveal its findings. The eight hearings are slated to take place over several weeks beginning June 9, some during prime time in an effort to attract a large television audience.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/12/us/house-subpoenas-jan-6.html

I hope they do nothing more than issue the subpoena.

Let them flaunt the law.

Then hold them up as criminal and I have top posted who should be called instead.

The witnesses who worked for them. The people they had aid them in this crime by following orders or those who testify to what they saw when their public guard was down, and they spoke the truth.

Especially about the lying.
They really need to focus on lying about the election to their voters and the nation.
Which was the motivator for the insurrection.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

Abortion clinic employees are not supreme court justices.

Why did anyone have to tell you that?

Every day there are protests at the WH, the home of our potus. It's our 1st amendment right to protest.

 

[Colorforms]

Every day there are protests at the WH. It's our 1st amendment right to protest anyone.

Except justices in the process of making a ruling. That is a federal law and each and every protestor protesting at the home of a supreme court justice needs a stiff fine and jail time.

Of course, the Biden DOJ isn't going to do anything about it because the Biden administration is a lawless mess filled with ideologues and incompetents.