New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

How about Lester Holt's performance?

Bugsy McGurk

Bugsy McGurk

President
He sure gave Trump much more time than he deserved, and he let Trump ignore his questions (even allowing Trump to interrupt his question and talk over him). Holt was basically a wuss.

But in the end, giving Trump more time to embarass himself may have been the best thing he could do for Hillary.

;-)
 
Holt was owned by both.................poor ass Mod..............giving Trump more time made sure illary didn't have time to prove she was reading from her Podium.........local news interviewing black college students and of course illary they choose..........LMAO
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
He sure gave Trump much more time than he deserved, and he let Trump ignore his questions (even allowing Trump to interrupt his question and talk over him). Holt was basically a wuss.

But in the end, giving Trump more time to embarass himself may have been the best thing he could do for Hillary.

;-)
Click to expand...
He kind of let them go at it. He did fact check Trump a couple of times. Those times it was the obvious lies that Trump has been using on his campaign swings. He also tried to keep Trump from interrupting Clinton, but Tump kept it up until the end of the debate.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
He sure gave Trump much more time than he deserved, and he let Trump ignore his questions (even allowing Trump to interrupt his question and talk over him). Holt was basically a wuss.

But in the end, giving Trump more time to embarass himself may have been the best thing he could do for Hillary.

;-)
Click to expand...
He let 'em go at it. Trump used it ramble and go out in left field a lot.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
He sure gave Trump much more time than he deserved, and he let Trump ignore his questions (even allowing Trump to interrupt his question and talk over him). Holt was basically a wuss.

But in the end, giving Trump more time to embarass himself may have been the best thing he could do for Hillary.

;-)
Click to expand...

What performance?
 
Dawg said:
Did you see illary write anything___________Trump wasn't looking down while talking........my gawd Bugsy..............you a pitiful excuse of transparency........
Click to expand...

She was glancing down at the podium so often I got the idea she didn't memorize her prepared answers very well.
 
I think he was somewhat of a wuss. But most moderators are when it comes to candidates blathering past their time allotted.
 
The Thinker said:
I think he was somewhat of a wuss. But most moderators are when it comes to candidates blathering past their time allotted.
Click to expand...

The GOP conspiracy buff might argue that Holt intentionally allowed Trump to drone on because Trump hurt himself with his incoherent yapping.

Seriously though, Holt did allow Trump to run roughshod over his attempts to end Trump's filibusters. He did come across as a wuss.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
He sure gave Trump much more time than he deserved, and he let Trump ignore his questions (even allowing Trump to interrupt his question and talk over him). Holt was basically a wuss.

But in the end, giving Trump more time to embarass himself may have been the best thing he could do for Hillary.

;-)
Click to expand...

Holt basically was the best protection Hillary could ask for. I'm sure he earned every penny from the Clinton Foundation.
 
reason10 said:
Nobody gave Trump ANY extra time. He just took it.

He attacks Trump about Rosie ODonnell and conveniently fails to mention the Clinton Foundation or the Emails.
Click to expand...

The debate was a policy debate.

Trump wandered off subject by talking about emails...when the subject was taxes.

There was no reason...there that word again...to bring up Rosie O'Donnell. If Trump still holds on to that feud, he's showing himself to be a petty, petty, petty man.
 
reason10 said:
Nobody gave Trump ANY extra time. He just took it.

He attacks Trump about Rosie ODonnell and conveniently fails to mention the Clinton Foundation or the Emails.
Click to expand...

Actually, Hillary blasted Trump for his insults against woman (not Holt), and Holt did ask Hillary about emails (for the millionth time) after lamely allowing Trump to change the subject from Trump's tax returns to Hillary's emails.

You're just whining because Trump choked.

;-)
 
Craig said:
The debate was a policy debate.

Trump wandered off subject by talking about emails...when the subject was taxes.

There was no reason...there that word again...to bring up Rosie O'Donnell. If Trump still holds on to that feud, he's showing himself to be a petty, petty, petty man.
Click to expand...

The debate was not a policy debate. It was a "LET'S SAVE HILLARY'S DROPPING POLL NUMBERS," debate.

And Trump didn't let Holt get away with it. The guy kept trying to interrupt with pseudo "fact checks" which were nothing more than liberal bullshit and Trump cut him off.
 
reason10 said:
The debate was not a policy debate. It was a "LET'S SAVE HILLARY'S DROPPING POLL NUMBERS," debate.

And Trump didn't let Holt get away with it. The guy kept trying to interrupt with pseudo "fact checks" which were nothing more than liberal bullshit and Trump cut him off.
Click to expand...

Holt only fact checked Trump when Trump lied about Holt's questions. For example, when Holt noted that Trump supported invading Iraq, which led Trump to AGAIN lie, falsely claiming he opposed going into Iraq. Holt couldn't allow Trump to lie about the question.
 
reason10 said:
The debate was not a policy debate. It was a "LET'S SAVE HILLARY'S DROPPING POLL NUMBERS," debate.

And Trump didn't let Holt get away with it. The guy kept trying to interrupt with pseudo "fact checks" which were nothing more than liberal bullshit and Trump cut him off.
Click to expand...

Yes, it was a policy debate and Trump showed himself to be proudly unprepared.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top