How do you overturn something that actually hasn't happened?

[Boltlady]

While admittedly I haven't heard all of the one-sided hearing about 1/6 yet, at least the parts they've presented so far, but there is one thing that keeps being said over and over. That is they keep saying that Prez Trump was trying to overturn the election. According to everything I've seem the election had not been completed yet. He was trying to send the electoral information back to the states to review for corrections.

The election was not complete until it was certified, that being part of the process, so he was not trying to overturn something that had not been completed.

 

[Colorforms]

While admittedly I haven't heard all of the one-sided hearing about 1/6 yet, at least the parts they've presented so far, but there is one thing that keeps being said over and over. That is they keep saying that Prez Trump was trying to overturn the election. According to everything I've seem the election had not been completed yet. He was trying to send the electoral information back to the states to review for corrections.

The election was not complete until it was certified, that being part of the process, so he was not trying to overturn something that had not been completed.

Trump had every right to question the outcome of an election riddled with so many inconsistencies, rule changes, and overt corruption.

 

[worldlymrb]

While admittedly I haven't heard all of the one-sided hearing about 1/6 yet, at least the parts they've presented so far, but there is one thing that keeps being said over and over. That is they keep saying that Prez Trump was trying to overturn the election. According to everything I've seem the election had not been completed yet. He was trying to send the electoral information back to the states to review for corrections.

The election was not complete until it was certified, that being part of the process, so he was not trying to overturn something that had not been completed.

Dems got their work cut out in stealing the midterms this year.

Unlike presidential elections where one corrupt blue mega city can create enough phony ballots to be counted to win a state in a close election, that's not the case for midterms.

 

[EatTheRich]

Dems got their work cut out in stealing the midterms this year.

Unlike presidential elections where one corrupt blue mega city can create enough phony ballots to be counted to win a state in a close election, that's not the case for midterms.

Also impossible in presidential elections.

 

[EatTheRich]

While admittedly I haven't heard all of the one-sided hearing about 1/6 yet, at least the parts they've presented so far, but there is one thing that keeps being said over and over. That is they keep saying that Prez Trump was trying to overturn the election. According to everything I've seem the election had not been completed yet. He was trying to send the electoral information back to the states to review for corrections.

The election was not complete until it was certified, that being part of the process, so he was not trying to overturn something that had not been completed.

Counting the electoral votes was a formality. He was trying to prevent the winner’s victory from being counted.

Trump had every right to question the outcome of an election riddled with so many inconsistencies, rule changes, and overt corruption.

Such as? He questioned it in court without success (because he had no evidence of malfeasance) … what then gave him the right to stage a terrorist attack on the U.S. to alter the outcome?

 

[TBLee]

Also impossible in presidential elections.

What about the upcoming election in November? IF there is a red wave in November do you believe Democrats are going to be all in on the certification of such?

 

[God of War]

While admittedly I haven't heard all of the one-sided hearing about 1/6 yet, at least the parts they've presented so far, but there is one thing that keeps being said over and over. That is they keep saying that Prez Trump was trying to overturn the election. According to everything I've seem the election had not been completed yet. He was trying to send the electoral information back to the states to review for corrections.

The election was not complete until it was certified, that being part of the process, so he was not trying to overturn something that had not been completed.

Perfect reasoning. Don't think the Dems will let that get in the way. ha ha

 

[ObamacareForever]

What about the upcoming election in November? IF there is a red wave in November do you believe Democrats are going to be all in on the certification of such?

While admittedly I haven't heard all of the one-sided hearing about 1/6 yet, at least the parts they've presented so far, but there is one thing that keeps being said over and over. That is they keep saying that Prez Trump was trying to overturn the election. According to everything I've seem the election had not been completed yet. He was trying to send the electoral information back to the states to review for corrections.

The election was not complete until it was certified, that being part of the process, so he was not trying to overturn something that had not been completed.

The election was completed in November 2020. That didn't change.

 

[TBLee]

The election was completed in November 2020. That didn't change.

I clearly was asking an opinion on the acceptance by Democrats in less than five months IF there is a red wave. Do try to pay attention…

 

[ObamacareForever]

I clearly was asking an opinion on the acceptance by Democrats in less than five months IF there is a red wave. Do try to pay attention…

You have no whataboutism to compare Jan 6th. So you need to create a hypothetical to do so.
Grow up. Maybe when your older you will gain enough wisdom to see how pathetic that is.

 

[TBLee]

You have no whataboutism to compare Jan 6th. So you need to create a hypothetical to do so.
Grow up. Maybe when your older you will gain enough wisdom to see how pathetic that is.

I asked a question. I did not even ask the question of you. You were free to move along if you didn’t like my question. See how that works! Do try to pay attention…

 

[Boltlady]

Perfect reasoning. Don't think the Dems will let that get in the way. ha ha

They tend to skip over any facts they don't like.

 

[Boltlady]

The election was completed in November 2020. That didn't change.

It wasn't completed before the protest.

 

[ObamacareForever]

It wasn't completed before the protest.

That's what you are going with?

Good luck with that.

 

[middleview]

It wasn't completed before the protest.

The election was...the electoral count is a formality...preventing the completion of the constitutional process is still an insurrection.

 

[middleview]

Trump had every right to question the outcome of an election riddled with so many inconsistencies, rule changes, and overt corruption.

Trump claimed the election would be corrupt before the first ballot was cast...

He said it was stolen on election night...before any actual evidence had been found.

He filed over 60 lawsuits...he lost.

 

[Sickofleft]

Trump claimed the election would be corrupt before the first ballot was cast...

He said it was stolen on election night...before any actual evidence had been found.

He filed over 60 lawsuits...he lost.

He was right.

Also your description of what happened in the suits that were filed is an over generalization of what actually happened.

 

[middleview]

He was right.

Also your description of what happened in the suits that were filed is an over generalization of what actually happened.

How many did Trump win?

 

[Sickofleft]

How many did Trump win?

Again, an over generalization that does not accurately describe what happened. You claim there was no fraud and that is what the courts ruled, its actually not what they ruled. Of course, you will never be honest about anything just like your party.

Just keep screaming about the Pillow Guy and repeating "most secure election in history"...

 

[EatTheRich]

What about the upcoming election in November? IF there is a red wave in November do you believe Democrats are going to be all in on the certification of such?

Most likely. They don’t have enough of their support base hostile to democracy to get away with obstructing it, which is why when Republicans win elections both sides agree to give them the political power due, while when Democrats win elections Republicans try to annul the elections by violence.