Raoul_Luke
"Wait, it's all Marxism?" "Always has been."
Than it is about covid.
First off, as usual, I have been proven correct (again) by the facts. As I have been saying for over a year, natural immunity is very likely to be way better than vaccine immunity, and the science bears that out:
A newly published medical study found that infection from COVID-19 confers considerably longer-lasting and stronger protection against the Delta variant of the virus than vaccines.
“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a ‘Don’t try this at home’ label,” the Scientific American reported Thursday. “The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.”
Put another way, vaccinated individuals were 27 times more likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity from COVID.
Harvard Epidemiologist Says The Case For COVID Vaccine Passports Was Just Demolished | ZeroHedge
Those of us who are blessed with non-ideological, logic based intelligence, knew that all along - it was, after all, completely logical to assume that would be the case.
So we're left with the question, why did the covidiots on the left continue to insist that people who had contracted the virus and survived should still be vaccinated? And the obvious reason, obviously, is that their stance on this matter was based more on control and collectivism than it was on science. It was important to them that we all become part of their cult of responsibility for the welfare of others (collectivism), and that required the suspension of the thousands of years of real-world data that says natural immunity is not only achievable, but superior to that conveyed by an imperfect vaccine. The conclusion (obviously) is that we should be testing people for antibodies, and if they test positive, then they should be given a pass on being vaccinated.
And before the left starts their (typical) mantra "what's the harm, just get the jab whether you have natural immunity or not" narrative, I'm going to go out on another limb here and say that the science will eventually prove that, as with measles, you should NOT take the vaccine if you have had the disease. I know of two people right now who are suffering from complications after getting vaccinated, and, you guessed it, both of them had already survived Covid and had to be vaccinated because the covidiots made it impossible for them to keep their jobs if they refused the vaccine. Both say if they had it to do over, they would refuse the vaccine and take the unemployment (one has been in the hospital for an extended period anyway so he probably won't have a job when, or if, he gets better anyway).
So will one lefty step up and admit that maybe, just maybe, 100% vaccinated shouldn't be the goal here, and that antibodies, however acquired, should be the goal? Yeah, that's not going to happen...
First off, as usual, I have been proven correct (again) by the facts. As I have been saying for over a year, natural immunity is very likely to be way better than vaccine immunity, and the science bears that out:
A newly published medical study found that infection from COVID-19 confers considerably longer-lasting and stronger protection against the Delta variant of the virus than vaccines.
“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a ‘Don’t try this at home’ label,” the Scientific American reported Thursday. “The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.”
Put another way, vaccinated individuals were 27 times more likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity from COVID.
Harvard Epidemiologist Says The Case For COVID Vaccine Passports Was Just Demolished | ZeroHedge
Those of us who are blessed with non-ideological, logic based intelligence, knew that all along - it was, after all, completely logical to assume that would be the case.
So we're left with the question, why did the covidiots on the left continue to insist that people who had contracted the virus and survived should still be vaccinated? And the obvious reason, obviously, is that their stance on this matter was based more on control and collectivism than it was on science. It was important to them that we all become part of their cult of responsibility for the welfare of others (collectivism), and that required the suspension of the thousands of years of real-world data that says natural immunity is not only achievable, but superior to that conveyed by an imperfect vaccine. The conclusion (obviously) is that we should be testing people for antibodies, and if they test positive, then they should be given a pass on being vaccinated.
And before the left starts their (typical) mantra "what's the harm, just get the jab whether you have natural immunity or not" narrative, I'm going to go out on another limb here and say that the science will eventually prove that, as with measles, you should NOT take the vaccine if you have had the disease. I know of two people right now who are suffering from complications after getting vaccinated, and, you guessed it, both of them had already survived Covid and had to be vaccinated because the covidiots made it impossible for them to keep their jobs if they refused the vaccine. Both say if they had it to do over, they would refuse the vaccine and take the unemployment (one has been in the hospital for an extended period anyway so he probably won't have a job when, or if, he gets better anyway).
So will one lefty step up and admit that maybe, just maybe, 100% vaccinated shouldn't be the goal here, and that antibodies, however acquired, should be the goal? Yeah, that's not going to happen...
