I'm not a republican (no political affiliation) but on this board all the Obama supporters regard me as right wing, so I might as well give my 2 cents worth.
A president's success is defined by 2 factors: the intelligence of the advisors he surrounds himself with, and the number of military conflicts he is confronted with.
On that score, Obama has been doubly unlucky - he insists on being surrounded by sycophantic yes men (and yes-women), and hasn't been able to defeat our foes any better than Bush did.
Bush's advisors (domestically) were reasonably astute. He had bad middle east advisors.
If Trump is surrounded by good advisors, I see no evidence of it. His intemperate rhetoric might not lead to war with Mexico, but its also unlikely to attract any help if we need a "coalition of the willing" to confront a threat.
Hillary also has a tendency to surround herself with people who don't disagree with her. Possibly Cruz as well. Rubio has shown a surprising ability to discard failed proposals, and move forward. Hard liners hate this, and use it as a reason to diss him.
Do you think Donald Trump would make a better President than George W Bush ?
If so why ?
It is possible. But why do you ask?
GW Bush isn't running for president.
If you asked if Trump would make a better president than Cruz, or Rubio or any other republican, it would be yes or no depending upon the other involved party.
If you asked if Trump would make a better president than Clinton, or Sanders the answer would be a definite YES.
Do you think Donald Trump would make a better President than George W Bush ?
If so why ?
I am not a republican but certainly a conservative, however I voted against GWB twice, so I don't necessarily think he was "good" president, however, I would take him back in a heartbeat over Obama any day.
But, I guess it would depend on what your definition of "better" is.
I think that Donald Trump would be "better" to the extent that I think he would be much more consicious of spending, Gov't spending, and would not let Gov't employees get away with business as usual. So, I would expect a lot of slashes and cuts to Gov't spending and efficiencies in some ways. Maybe spend more one place, spend less somewhere else. I think he will not care who in this country he pisses off. So, if he wants to build a wall and start raiding homes in the dead of night and kicking out illegals, he won't care how much flck he gets about it. I like that he is beholden to no special interest.
I think too, that while he would absolutely engage in military action if he believed it was in our best interest - there would be none of this "nation building" crap. He does't believe in exporting democracy. He believes in crushing our enemies and leaving them to waste. So, none of this long occupation, etc. Come in - destroy - accomplish our goal, and get the hell out - they are no longer our problem. That kind of attitude is certainly an improvement of Bush's failed strategies.
He is not Statesmen though. He isn't going to bring dignity to the office, that is for sure. At this point though I am really past caring about all that stuff. I want someone to end waste in Gov't. To deal harshly with illegals, and kick the ass of our enemies. I don't really give a Fvck how that gets done.
Third response in a row and still no direct answer, curious. You seem not to care and whether he is better or not.
Your response pretty much boils down to this.
There can be no direct response. He will likely be better in some ways, and not better in other ways.
The days of having a true honest statesman are over, if indeed they ever existed in the first place. No one other than that will ever be a "good" or "great" president. Our only hope is that they don't colossally suck. GWB did colosally suck. I thought it was not actually possible to suck worse, but then we got Obama. So, I am certainly hesitant to say that we couldn't get a more sucky President again.
Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama !
I know you feel a need to attack him. And it is strange that you say there can be no direct response to this simple question. Yet you had no problem responding to the question as if it were asked about him even though the question had NOTHING to do with him.
Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama Obama !
I know you feel a need to attack him. And it is strange that you say there can be no direct response to this simple question. Yet you had no problem responding to the question as if it were asked about him even though the question had NOTHING to do with him.
Do you think Donald Trump would make a better President than George W Bush ?
If so why ?
Do you think Donald Trump would make a better President than George W Bush ?
If so why ?
Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush
I've always heard the ONLY "stupid question is the one not ask"
well, that got blown up in smoke
No, but I appreciate your stupid "when did you stop beatn your wife" question.
Well..not really...what I really appreciate is you showing you're a half clever liitle nothing nobody that only your mama could love and a dollar to a donut she doesn't, and just wishes you'd vacate her basement and get a job.
Happy New Year.
Donald Trump will make a better prez than Bush because Trump is not beholden to anyone and not part of an establishment that is responsible for driving America over a cliff.
Yes. I do.Do you think Donald Trump would make a better President than George W Bush ?
If so why ?
If there was a reward for cons here with at least a smidgen of courage you would be the winner.
Also good to see one of you finally admit bush and his cronies drove America over the cliff. You'd also win the award for honesty among cons too.
Do you think Donald Trump would make a better President than George W Bush ?
If so why ?
I don't know if he will be a better president than Bush but at least he won't be all kissy face and hand holding with the Saudi muzzies.Do you think Donald Trump would make a better President than George W Bush ?
If so why ?