New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

I might've been wrong about Cunningham(D-NC)

bdtex said:
Even in NC, the Trump ball-and-chain is so heavy that an extramarital sex "scandal" might not be a candidate killer. Either that or Sen. Tillis(R-NC) is that bad.

www.politico.com

North Carolina voters unmoved by Dem Senate hopeful’s sex scandal

Democrat Cal Cunningham continues to lead GOP Sen. Thom Tillis in the polls, even after revelations that Cunningham had an extramarital affair.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
Click to expand...

Like a typical lib he makes a mea copa but a real man like Trump won't apologize for porking whores. Unlike Cunningham, Trump pays for his whores fair and square. Libs like Clinton are charity cases who screw slum it and groupies. Trump's whores are expensive top shelf.
 
When you're a LTC caught fvcking a disabled comrads wife...........you will get a Dishonorable Discharge............unless our military has gone liberal
 
Dawg said:
When you're a LTC caught fvcking a disabled comrads wife...........you will get a Dishonorable Discharge............unless our military has gone liberal
Click to expand...
Good one! Cunningham should have opened his wallet and fvcked whores like Trump does. This only goes to show, Cunningham has poor judgement. Stick with pros Cal!

It pays to Fvck the best. High end hos ain't cheap. Trump is so gangsta yo MAGA! Pimpin hos nationwide!
 
bdtex said:
Even in NC, the Trump ball-and-chain is so heavy that an extramarital sex "scandal" might not be a candidate killer. Either that or Sen. Tillis(R-NC) is that bad.

www.politico.com

North Carolina voters unmoved by Dem Senate hopeful’s sex scandal

Democrat Cal Cunningham continues to lead GOP Sen. Thom Tillis in the polls, even after revelations that Cunningham had an extramarital affair.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
Click to expand...

Interesting take on the matter...….

1) the Trump ball-and-chain is so heavy that an extramarital sex "scandal" might not be a candidate killer.

2) Sen. Tillis(R-NC) is that bad.

ORrrrrrrr……….

3) Democrats lust to gain power at any costs allows them to merely feign "moral outrage" when it comes to extramarital sex, label them to be "scandals" only if they involve a Republican.

It could be any of those.
 
UPNYA2 said:
Interesting take on the matter...….

1) the Trump ball-and-chain is so heavy that an extramarital sex "scandal" might not be a candidate killer.

2) Sen. Tillis(R-NC) is that bad.

ORrrrrrrr……….

3) Democrats lust to gain power at any costs allows them to merely feign "moral outrage" when it comes to extramarital sex, label them to be "scandals" only if they involve a Republican.

It could be any of those.
Click to expand...
It could be that banging a porn star while your wife is pregnant, paying her hush money and it being acceptable to 46% of the 2016 general electorate and a majority of the 2016 NC electorate has something to do with it.
 
UPNYA2 said:
Interesting take on the matter...….

1) the Trump ball-and-chain is so heavy that an extramarital sex "scandal" might not be a candidate killer.

2) Sen. Tillis(R-NC) is that bad.

ORrrrrrrr……….

3) Democrats lust to gain power at any costs allows them to merely feign "moral outrage" when it comes to extramarital sex, label them to be "scandals" only if they involve a Republican.

It could be any of those.
Click to expand...
Or it could be that hiking the Appalachian Trail with your mistress and being elected to Congress in SC has something to do with it.
 
bdtex said:
It could be that banging a porn star while your wife is pregnant, paying her hush money and it being acceptable to 46% of the 2016 general electorate and a majority of the 2016 NC electorate has something to do with it.
Click to expand...

It could.

But what Trump, and any other Republican you may decide to point to as well, did was considered absolutely vile, (still is obviously), according to those who somehow do not mind something similar now. How does that work exactly?

Is it that 46% who didn't or do not now, seem to worry about what Trump did all over our press yammering for this Senator to be booted now, the way the other 54% did with Trump?

I have seen nothing in the press showing this to be happening the way we all saw with Trumps wrong doings. Seems to me that those who were not concerned with the Trump incident are also not overly concerned with this instance either. The only obvious difference appears to be that NOW some who howled about evil assed Trump have suddenly joined the percentage who find it to be, "acceptable".

Neither one bothers me much. I know of no person alive who doesn't have something they do or have done in their past that some would be offended by, Lord knows I wouldn't qualify, so using such a standard we would have no one to serve the public.

Therefore I base my decisions on proven or stated policies and positions and then hope the ones I vote for will be a stand out oddity among politicians and prove to be one who actually can and will do as they did in the past or promise to do in the future.

Others use other methods. Including selective "moral" outrage unfortunately.

I was merely pointing that out.
 
Last edited:
bdtex said:
Even in NC, the Trump ball-and-chain is so heavy that an extramarital sex "scandal" might not be a candidate killer. Either that or Sen. Tillis(R-NC) is that bad.

www.politico.com

North Carolina voters unmoved by Dem Senate hopeful’s sex scandal

Democrat Cal Cunningham continues to lead GOP Sen. Thom Tillis in the polls, even after revelations that Cunningham had an extramarital affair.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
Click to expand...
Redemption. They forgave Trump so why not everyone else? Of course, Cunningham said he was sorry, Trump didn't.
 
UPNYA2 said:
It could.

But what Trump, and any other Republican you may decide to point to as well, did was considered absolutely vile, (still is obviously), according to those who somehow do not mind something similar now. How does that work exactly?

Is it that 46% who didn't or do not now, seem to worry about what Trump did all over our press yammering for this Senator to be booted now, the way the other 54% did with Trump?

I have seen nothing in the press showing this to be happening the way we all saw with Trumps wrong doings. Seems to me that those who were not concerned with the Trump incident are also not overly concerned with this instance either. The only obvious difference appears to be that NOW some who howled about evil assed Trump have suddenly joined the percentage who find it to be, "acceptable".

Neither one bothers me much. I know of no person alive who doesn't have something they do or have done in their past that some would be offended by, Lord knows I wouldn't qualify, so using such a standard we would have no one to serve the public.

Therefore I base my decisions on proven or stated policies and positions and then hope the ones I vote for will be a stand out oddity among politicians and prove to be one who actually can and will do as they did in the past or promise to do in the future.

Others use other methods. Including selective "moral" outrage unfortunately.

I was merely pointing that out.
Click to expand...
Roger that. Perhaps I was a bit overly aggressive in my replies.
 
bdtex said:
Roger that. Perhaps I was a bit overly aggressive in my replies.
Click to expand...

There was nothing overly aggressive in your replies as far as I am concerned. At least you tend to keep it more civil than most.

Myself included.

Odd thing about that is how I seem to be one of a very few who can take it or dish it out either way and equally enjoy the exchange and that I know and accept that fact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top