New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Ideas for small steps toward gun control..

1. Reduce gun violence in tv and film.

2. No more 1st person shooter games.

3. No glorification of gang violence in media, music, videos..


wha? no?....
Do other countries that have those three things lose as many children per year to gun violence as we do?
 
Ok, So I watch an episode of the Rifleman, a popular show from 1958-1963. On the show the main character is a custom rifle and Chuck Connors. Each episode he shoots the rifle to start the show's lead in then in 25 minutes or so he usually shoots a few "bad guys" , some are simply guys who maybe bumped into him at the saloon or crossed his land without "purmission ". Now, as you see when you search this , kids bought the toy guns and practiced the spins and from the hip shooting. Ok, with that established - why didn't those kids go out and kill "perceived bad guys". You also had shows like Gunsmoke, Have Gun Will Travel, Combat, Rat Patrol, etc.
So where did things change and why? I understand movie violence is much worse but many of these shows glorified street / western justice? Maybe these killers feel justified that they are going after the " perceived bad guys " through cultural grooming.

 
Who would you fear more -
Chuck Norris or Charles Bronson - Both unarmed?
Hulk Hogan or Deputy Barney Fife - Both unarmed?

** when alive
 
Last edited:
Do other countries that have those three things lose as many children per year to gun violence as we do?

Don't know. Most don't seem to have the issues we do, so I'll limit my focus to brainstormibg about here
 
civilian-firearms-per-100-people.jpg

age-standardized-homicide-rate-per-100k.jpg
 
Do other countries that have those three things lose as many children per year to gun violence as we do?

well do they? What do they have to do with America?
Do they lose as many children to dope/meds or Tide Pods?

28276351_2045758555670340_4197519561811738346_n.jpg
Israel doesn't have a problem
 
Last edited:
Who would you fear more -
Chuck Norris or Charles Bronson - Both unarmed?
Hulk Hogan or Deputy Barney Fife - Both unarmed?

** when alive

Worst ass kicking I ever saw was a beefy redneck and a scrawny kid. The scrawny kid...glasses and all...was quite the accomplished kick boxer. I think the first one to land on the big guy's chin and he absolutely knew he was in deep yogurt.
 
1/2/3 have notta to do with 1st amendment

TV/Video games/gangs are not a right
The freedom to create them is a right.

So how about this if you disagree

1. Reduce guns violence in tv and film available for sale with a strict quota on manufactures

2. No more 1st person shooter games semi-automatic weapons or double action weapons. Every gun sold to the average citizen must be physically cocked by the user before each round can be fired.

3. No glorification of gang violence in media, music, videos private gun sales. All guns must be bought and sold on a govt regulated exchange.
 
The freedom to create them is a right.

So how about this if you disagree

1. Reduce guns violence in tv and film available for sale with a strict quota on manufactures

2. No more 1st person shooter games semi-automatic weapons or double action weapons. Every gun sold to the average citizen must be physically cocked by the user before each round can be fired.

3. No glorification of gang violence in media, music, videos private gun sales. All guns must be bought and sold on a govt regulated exchange.


why are these freedoms ok, but not guns
 
The freedom to create them is a right.

So how about this if you disagree

1. Reduce guns violence in tv and film available for sale with a strict quota on manufactures

2. No more 1st person shooter games semi-automatic weapons or double action weapons. Every gun sold to the average citizen must be physically cocked by the user before each round can be fired.

3. No glorification of gang violence in media, music, videos private gun sales. All guns must be bought and sold on a govt regulated exchange.

Yet, not a damn thing to do with 1st amendment

27751705_10210789487395736_7516754853167099117_n.jpg
duh
 
Illegal possession of a firearm = felony charge.

Charges are meaningless when the "criminal justice" system in the murder capital of the USA is a revolving door where armed criminals go free again and again . . .

St. Louis Police Chief Dan Isom:

____________________________

"One thing we have to be aware of to give context to this whole problem is that we are looking at an urban problem. It’s much less a suburban or rural problem. It really affects young minorities— Hispanic and black males. I think that the suspects devalue life, the victims devalue life, and the system also devalues life. When you look at the shooting victims and suspects in these neighborhoods, you see 20 or 30 felony arrests, with eight convictions.

Often the convictions don’t result in any jail time at all; they’re getting probation on top of probation. This has caused a lot of us in cities to move toward federal prosecution, because we know on the state level it’s a hit-and-miss prospect: they’re arrested, they’re convicted, and they come out multiple times.

In Missouri, there’s a type of probation people can receive, and it has made it very difficult for us to establish a person as a convicted felon. I’ve heard other chiefs talking about the fact that a weapons charge in their state is only a misdemeanor offense. But in St. Louis, a weapons violation can turn out to be no offense at all. An individual will get arrested for a weapons charge, which is a felony, and often they plead to that case and get an SIS—a suspended imposition of sentence. It means that if you serve out your probation, which everybody does, that conviction is erased.

So if you’re arrested again with another weapon, you don’t have a conviction on your record, so you’re not a felon in possession of a weapon. If you continue to get multiple SISs, you never become a convicted felon. These offenders will often show up for other crimes, and if they never have a conviction, then you’re never able to put stiffer charges on them."​
 
Back
Top