New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

If this is true, we're in big trouble

NY post, now how much of this is true do you think ? It is on Redstate.COM, A website known for posting unfactual information, amiright? An OP ED being touted as Truth?

So how far down the family tree are you trump beloved faithful going to go to " find a scandal ? "
 
Last edited:
So no proof - just might have happened, from your article ( if you read it ) this is an OPINION ED, just speculation and a click bait item for you desperate people.


If they are correct in how this is done, there's POTENTIAL here that billions - billions of dollars MAY have been funneled to Democrat candidates, supporters, and donors.

There are a million-and-one reasons to kick Kamala Harris and as many Democrats as possible out of office in November as possible. If proven to be true, this is one more for the list.
 
middleview said:
Opinion, but no evidence. Typical.
Click to expand...

you need to learn to understand what causes opinions like that to be formed. It often includes a grouping of facts that form the picture in advance of the final evidence. It's often a good idea to react in advance of the damage that could be done.

Would you not seek shelter when there are warnings that a tornado may be imminent?
 
Boltlady said:
you need to learn to understand what causes opinions like that to be formed. It often includes a grouping of facts that form the picture in advance of the final evidence. It's often a good idea to react in advance of the damage that could be done.

Would you not seek shelter when there are warnings that a tornado may be imminent?
Click to expand...
You should understand that opinions that form the basis for accusing someone of breaking the law or committing corrupt acts are simply slander....they are not a "grouping of facts" at all...speculation is more likely.

Many people formed opinions of election fraud, but mostly based on conspiracy theories that were simply concocted to support the loser in the election. I approach each as possibly true and investigate....like the crap that Mike Lindell came up with about Chinese hackers flipping votes by illegally sending transactions to Dominion systems through internet connected thermostats.
 
middleview said:
You should understand that opinions that form the basis for accusing someone of breaking the law or committing corrupt acts are simply slander....they are not a "grouping of facts" at all...speculation is more likely.

Many people formed opinions of election fraud, but mostly based on conspiracy theories that were simply concocted to support the loser in the election. I approach each as possibly true and investigate....like the crap that Mike Lindell came up with about Chinese hackers flipping votes by illegally sending transactions to Dominion systems through internet connected thermostats.
Click to expand...

So we'll watch for the lawsuit claiming slander.
 
Boltlady said:
So we'll watch for the lawsuit claiming slander.
Click to expand...
In this case the story is that "There Might be corruption here"....Notice how the article quoted does not show that there was a corrupt act but the headline implies there was....a pretty slimy dodge. From the link:
NEW: NY Post Op-Ed Claims Kamala's Brother-in-Law Fleeced Taxpayers for Billions While a DOJ Lawyer

Hunter Biden may be shamelessly corrupt, but there's more than one way to skin a fleecing-the-taxpayers cat, and in an op-ed published Friday by the New York Post, the writers claim that Kamala Harris' brother-in-law Tony West may have found a whole new way to define "corrupt."
 
Boltlady said:
you need to learn to understand what causes opinions like that to be formed. It often includes a grouping of facts that form the picture in advance of the final evidence. It's often a good idea to react in advance of the damage that could be done.

Would you not seek shelter when there are warnings that a tornado may be imminent?
Click to expand...
Opinions like that go a longazz way to brainwash idiots, amiright?
 
middleview said:
In this case the story is that "There Might be corruption here"....Notice how the article quoted does not show that there was a corrupt act but the headline implies there was....a pretty slimy dodge. From the link:
NEW: NY Post Op-Ed Claims Kamala's Brother-in-Law Fleeced Taxpayers for Billions While a DOJ Lawyer

Hunter Biden may be shamelessly corrupt, but there's more than one way to skin a fleecing-the-taxpayers cat, and in an op-ed published Friday by the New York Post, the writers claim that Kamala Harris' brother-in-law Tony West may have found a whole new way to define "corrupt."
Click to expand...
And Trump is as fat as Santa Claus - now that is a fact not an opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top