Immigrant War

[squareshot]

Hi All. I saw a lady on the news saying that if we fed all the illegal immigrants, there would be no food left for America's poor. I would be more worried about the jobs that these immigrants would fill. I know that they re low wage jobs, but we already have many Americans doing these types of jobs, because many jobs have been moved out of this country. Americans can't take many more hits on the labor front, and many are unable to make ends meet. I have a feeling that if the increase in illegal aliens is not side tracked or stopped, we will literally be involved in a war on our own soil. Washington seems to be making no effort to end it, and more interested in political rhetoric. The political parties seem to be more interested in fighting each other. And playing the fiddle while Rome burns.

 

[Dino]

Hi All. I saw a lady on the news saying that if we fed all the illegal immigrants, there would be no food left for America's poor. I would be more worried about the jobs that these immigrants would fill. I know that they re low wage jobs, but we already have many Americans doing these types of jobs, because many jobs have been moved out of this country. Americans can't take many more hits on the labor front, and many are unable to make ends meet. I have a feeling that if the increase in illegal aliens is not side tracked or stopped, we will literally be involved in a war on our own soil. Washington seems to be making no effort to end it, and more interested in political rhetoric. The political parties seem to be more interested in fighting each other. And playing the fiddle while Rome burns.

I agree, except one thing.

One side of the aisle seems a lot more bent on stopping this flow of illegals as opposed to the other. I don't think it takes much imagination to see which is which.

One side benefits from straining our resources to the maximum, straining the job market to the breaking point and placing more people on public assistance. They tend to be the ones who call people "heartless" or "racist" when they want to stem the flow of illegal immigration. I consider that to be most closed-minded and unamerican.

Pay attention when the bordeer is debated and you'll see what I mean.

 

[squareshot]

I agree, except one thing.

One side of the aisle seems a lot more bent on stopping this flow of illegals as opposed to the other. I don't think it takes much imagination to see which is which.

One side benefits from straining our resources to the maximum, straining the job market to the breaking point and placing more people on public assistance. They tend to be the ones who call people "heartless" or "racist" when they want to stem the flow of illegal immigration. I consider that to be most closed-minded and unamerican.

Pay attention when the bordeer is debated and you'll see what I mean.

Hi Dino, Again I think the politics that have been going on are non-patrician. It falls on both sides of the aisle and in the white house. This mess needs to be resolved right now. And if some political points are won or lost, so what. We are talking about the future of our great nation. And if it is not resolved, the blood running in the streets will be on the heads of all who fail to do their job. I have no political agenda in this discussion, except to try to get Washington off it's collective butts.

 

[resident_evil]

Hi Dino, Again I think the politics that have been going on are non-patrician. It falls on both sides of the aisle and in the white house. This mess needs to be resolved right now. And if some political points are won or lost, so what. We are talking about the future of our great nation. And if it is not resolved, the blood running in the streets will be on the heads of all who fail to do their job. I have no political agenda in this discussion, except to try to get Washington off it's collective butts.

Why does it have to be the blood of brown people. Why can't it be the blood of the political and business elites who time and again screw America (NAFTA, China,...)?

 

[Dino]

Hi Dino, Again I think the politics that have been going on are non-patrician. It falls on both sides of the aisle and in the white house. This mess needs to be resolved right now. And if some political points are won or lost, so what. We are talking about the future of our great nation. And if it is not resolved, the blood running in the streets will be on the heads of all who fail to do their job. I have no political agenda in this discussion, except to try to get Washington off it's collective butts.

As I said, it would be to the benefit to all citizens if we had BOTH sides seeking a resolution that does what's best for America. We don't have that right now. Unfortunately, one side derives benefit from the chaos surrounding the subject and their acolytes use any resolution to the issue as a pejorative against their fellow Americans.

 

[resident_evil]

As I said, it would be to the benefit to all citizens if we had BOTH sides seeking a resolution that does what's best for America. We don't have that right now. Unfortunately, one side derives benefit from the chaos surrounding the subject and their acolytes use any resolution to the issue as a pejorative against their fellow Americans.

Business has had conservative politicians plugging amnesty too for the sake of cheap labor. The GOP is NOT innocent.

 

[Dino]

Business has had conservative politicians plugging amnesty too for the sake of cheap labor. The GOP is NOT innocent.

Absolutely, they're low-life scum and don't care about the harm this does the country and their own party. But they are far outnumbered by the PC anticapitalist maniacs on the opposite side.

 

[as seen on tv]

i saw a lady on the news saying your entire post is made up.

 

[squareshot]

Why does it have to be the blood of brown people. Why can't it be the blood of the political and business elites who time and again screw America (NAFTA, China,...)?

Hi R.E. I was not aware that I specified any specific race, and if people die because Washington fails to act, what other choice do we have to protect our way of life. I did not intend to say that all races would not suffer casualties. And rich and poor will see what it is like to live in a country where you dodge bullets daily.

 

[squareshot]

As I said, it would be to the benefit to all citizens if we had BOTH sides seeking a resolution that does what's best for America. We don't have that right now. Unfortunately, one side derives benefit from the chaos surrounding the subject and their acolytes use any resolution to the issue as a pejorative against their fellow Americans.

YEAH! We both agree that it will take both side and the white house working together in concert, to resolve the biggest crisis we will face in this lifetime.