New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Is Rep. Issa guilty of treason, or just an idiologically driven idiot?

both.

"Republicans were aiming to embarrass the Obama administration over State Department security lapses. But they inadvertently caused a different picture to emerge than the one that has been publicly known: that the victims may have been let down not by the State Department but by the CIA. If the CIA was playing such a major role in these events, which was the unmistakable impression left by Wednesday’s hearing, having a televised probe of the matter was absurd.
 
BrianDamage said:
Rep. Issa outs the CIA in Libya.
Click to expand...

Dana Milbank, left-wing extremest opinion writer. The whole article is a joke which goes in opposite directions. What is not said and is known, is that the complex and the annex in Libya are all on the same block, right next to each other. CIA never came up and it is pure speculation that the CIA is even housed there. That being said, if they knew where the consulate facility was, they knew where the annex was.
 
JuliefromOhio said:
both.

"Republicans were aiming to embarrass the Obama administration over State Department security lapses. But they inadvertently caused a different picture to emerge than the one that has been publicly known: that the victims may have been let down not by the State Department but by the CIA. If the CIA was playing such a major role in these events, which was the unmistakable impression left by Wednesday’s hearing, having a televised probe of the matter was absurd.
Click to expand...

No one needed to embarrass the Obama administration, it does that all on it's own.

This murder of our Ambassador is serious, to downplay it is political and the Republicans didn't set up the timing, it happened on 9/11.

The real problem for the Obama Administration is that they mislead the American People by saying it happened because of a stupid video, that it was a "spontaneous" reaction only. No intelligent person believed that given just a minimum of the circumstances.

Now that much more information has been revealed, a cover up is highly likely and damaging to the Presidents re-election. They should have been honest from the beginning and accept that their foreign policy had flaws.
 
The Ambassador's murder was never downplayed. The claim that it was IS POLITICAL

Nor did the WH mislead anyone about anything. Sorry. Try again.

See unlike Donald "We know where the WMD Are" Rumsfeld.. this WH knows the diff between knowing and believing... ARe you also having problems with this distinction? Or is it that you simply object to the transparency of the WH in this situation?

The reality is that there is no coverup. What this is, is Issa trying to create the image of a coverup to keep the Obama campaign off message. Its only sorta kinda working. And its a precise example why Romney's claims of being able to be a bi-partisan are just bullsh!t.
 
And Beach dave comes surfing in from the alternate reality universe of the far rightwnger nutjobs who believe that the world was just fine before january 20, 2009 and disavows yet another group of republicons outing our top spy agency and possibly getting field agents killed, al in order to score political points. What's really funny is that these two crooks are leaders of the effort to cut over 300 million dollars out of the budget that would have funded more embassy security and possibly saved the lives of the Ambassador and the three others killed. Guess ol' Dave has been whacked in the head by his surfboard one too many times to think clearly.
 
jammer said:
And Beach dave comes surfing in from the alternate reality universe of the far rightwnger nutjobs who believe that the world was just fine before january 20, 2009 and disavows yet another group of republicons outing our top spy agency and possibly getting field agents killed, al in order to score political points. What's really funny is that these two crooks are leaders of the effort to cut over 300 million dollars out of the budget that would have funded more embassy security and possibly saved the lives of the Ambassador and the three others killed. Guess ol' Dave has been whacked in the head by his surfboard one too many times to think clearly.
Click to expand...

What's really funny is everything I said is absolutely true and your biker buddy Biden says last night that the White House didn't hear the Ambassador needed more security. Who's in charge?

I could have sworn that Rice was on five morning news programs a week after the incident, stating that the attack was spontaneous caused by a mob, she was fervent when speaking. Now through testimony we find the Administration along with the CIA and State Department knew it was a terrorist attack the next day, if not within the hour of it happening.
Someone is lying.
 
Now, the Romney team is trying to make more hay of all this by asserting that Biden's remarks directly contradict State. They don't.

The fact that State knows something doesn't mean the White House or the President do.
 
He's trying to pry truth from the Obama administration. Hillary and Lamb are guilty of gross negligent manslaughter.
 
TomFitz said:
Now, the Romney team is trying to make more hay of all this by asserting that Biden's remarks directly contradict State. They don't.

The fact that State knows something doesn't mean the White House or the President do.
Click to expand...

Even five days after our ambassador is murdered?
 
Well its turning out that Benghazi was a CIA station, not just a consulate. And that is classified info. And maybe why there is some cross testimony as parts of the administration sought to keep that secret FROM OUR ENEMIES.

And if Issa - like Scooter Libby before him, did this... then there should be a prosecutor going after Issa. Apparently not an unfamiliar circumstance for Issa but this time it will be a federal prosecutor not a local one
 
Beach Dave said:
Even five days after our ambassador is murdered?
Click to expand...
State didn't "know"...

And what is starting to surface is that what the difference might be is that the WH was worried about keeping our CIA Station's existance secret and some numbnut in State didn't figure that out.

And Issa may be pulling a Scooter Libby here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top