Spamature
President
Remember the not so old conservative response to govt violation of constitutional rights when it came to the so called "war on terror" ?
Back then when the bush administration had them peeing their collective panties over the threat from a bearded man in the cave. There was no god damn piece of paper that would stand in the way of protecting them from that boogieman. Hell, NO constitutional freedom from govt intrusion was worth dying for, as far as they were concern back then.
How strong is the Conservative Dissonance on this issue. Consider the fact they they were A-OK with govt intercepting every phone call, email or personal correspondence or personal record of any American it chooses. Yet today they're willing to fight tooth and nail to prevent the government from finding out if a maniac criminal or mentally ill individual is trying to stock pile weapons.
Hey but maybe their stance when it came to the 'war on terror was all about saving lives ?
But if their position was about saving American lives ? Then why don't they take in to consideration that more Americans have died at the hands of criminal gunmen and/ or a mentally ill person with a gun EVERY SINGLE YEAR since 9/10/2001, than total combined number of all American civilian victims of terrorism AND military personnel on the battlefield in the "war on terror" since the 9/10/2001 to the present.
So you tell me if this amendment meets the right wings definition of a suicide pact.
Back then when the bush administration had them peeing their collective panties over the threat from a bearded man in the cave. There was no god damn piece of paper that would stand in the way of protecting them from that boogieman. Hell, NO constitutional freedom from govt intrusion was worth dying for, as far as they were concern back then.
How strong is the Conservative Dissonance on this issue. Consider the fact they they were A-OK with govt intercepting every phone call, email or personal correspondence or personal record of any American it chooses. Yet today they're willing to fight tooth and nail to prevent the government from finding out if a maniac criminal or mentally ill individual is trying to stock pile weapons.
Hey but maybe their stance when it came to the 'war on terror was all about saving lives ?
But if their position was about saving American lives ? Then why don't they take in to consideration that more Americans have died at the hands of criminal gunmen and/ or a mentally ill person with a gun EVERY SINGLE YEAR since 9/10/2001, than total combined number of all American civilian victims of terrorism AND military personnel on the battlefield in the "war on terror" since the 9/10/2001 to the present.
So you tell me if this amendment meets the right wings definition of a suicide pact.
