"It was a DEBATE"...

[Mr. Friscus]

Kamala Harris went on one of her devoted followers shows, Stephen Colbert. While Colbert will support her through and through, he did ask her a difficult and obvious question about the fact that she insinuated and basically called Biden a racist and guilty of sex crimes during the primary debates.

How did Harris react?

She began awkwardly and forcefully laughing and said "IT WAS A DEBATE" over and over.

We can take multiple things from this interaction:

1. Harris couldn't answer the question.
2. She has a more phony forced laugh than Hillary Clinton ever did.
3. Harris is now admittedly one of two things: Someone who will say things they don't believe on the debate stage, or someone who will change their position at the drop of hat depending on the circumstances.

Whichever one she is, she's already admitted to not being a genuine. Many politicians aren't genuine, but it's rare to see her openly embrace it so much.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

Props to Colbert for putting her on the spot!

 

[Colorforms]

Kamala Harris went on one of her devoted followers shows, Stephen Colbert. While Colbert will support her through and through, he did ask her a difficult and obvious question about the fact that she insinuated and basically called Biden a racist and guilty of sex crimes during the primary debates.

How did Harris react?

She began awkwardly and forcefully laughing and said "IT WAS A DEBATE" over and over.

We can take multiple things from this interaction:

1. Harris couldn't answer the question.
2. She has a more phony forced laugh than Hillary Clinton ever did.
3. Harris is now admittedly one of two things: Someone who will say things they don't believe on the debate stage, or someone who will change their position at the drop of hat depending on the circumstances.

Whichever one she is, she's already admitted to not being a genuine. Many politicians aren't genuine, but it's rare to see her openly embrace it so much.

"It's a debate"?

Does that mean that Biden is a racist or that she is a liar?

 

[Mr. Friscus]

"It's a debate"?

Does that mean that Biden is a racist or that she is a liar?

That's what I'm curious of, and what no future journalist or media will want to know.

This never happened. Hey, she's laughing! She's hip! Come on... it was a DEBATE guys! Let's move on!

LOL

 

[Zam-Zam]

Kamala Harris went on one of her devoted followers shows, Stephen Colbert. While Colbert will support her through and through, he did ask her a difficult and obvious question about the fact that she insinuated and basically called Biden a racist and guilty of sex crimes during the primary debates.

How did Harris react?

She began awkwardly and forcefully laughing and said "IT WAS A DEBATE" over and over.

We can take multiple things from this interaction:

1. Harris couldn't answer the question.
2. She has a more phony forced laugh than Hillary Clinton ever did.
3. Harris is now admittedly one of two things: Someone who will say things they don't believe on the debate stage, or someone who will change their position at the drop of hat depending on the circumstances.

Whichever one she is, she's already admitted to not being a genuine. Many politicians aren't genuine, but it's rare to see her openly embrace it so much.

Does she mean that, if it's a debate, it's okay to accuse someone of basically being a sleazy, creepy guy even if she doesn't believe it?

Or that she believes it is true?

No right answer to that, I suppose.

 

[Drumcollie]

Kamala Harris went on one of her devoted followers shows, Stephen Colbert. While Colbert will support her through and through, he did ask her a difficult and obvious question about the fact that she insinuated and basically called Biden a racist and guilty of sex crimes during the primary debates.

How did Harris react?

She began awkwardly and forcefully laughing and said "IT WAS A DEBATE" over and over.

We can take multiple things from this interaction:

1. Harris couldn't answer the question.
2. She has a more phony forced laugh than Hillary Clinton ever did.
3. Harris is now admittedly one of two things: Someone who will say things they don't believe on the debate stage, or someone who will change their position at the drop of hat depending on the circumstances.

Whichever one she is, she's already admitted to not being a genuine. Many politicians aren't genuine, but it's rare to see her openly embrace it so much.

The answer is valid, but it leaves you with a few options:

1. She is the biggest motherf#$%%ing liar and will say anything to win even lie.

2. Joe Biden is a racist which then brings in the subset options:

a: She sell out for personal gain

b. KLM...Kamala's Life Matters, not yours.

c. She didn't sell out, she's gonna off him after the election cuz no Republican
wants a President Harris and will do it for her.

My advice to Kamala is if you value your life, don't off Joe then ask Hillary to be your V.P.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Does she mean that, if it's a debate, it's okay to accuse someone of basically being a sleazy, creepy guy even if she doesn't believe it?

Or that she believes it is true?

No right answer to that, I suppose.

She didn't accuse him of being sleazy or creepy.
She accused him of being old enough to have worked with segregrationists in Congress. Which is a fair criticism, he is in fact that old.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

She didn't accuse him of being sleazy or creepy.
She accused him of being old enough to have worked with segregrationists in Congress. Which is a fair criticism, he is in fact that old.

She accused him of being involved in racist policy that wanted to prevent her and minorities from busing opportunities as a child.

She also said she believed Biden's accusers of sex crimes.

That's some heavy artillery... and you know what she has to say about all that?

"HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You don't think I actually MEANT that did you? I mean come on.. IT WAS A DEBATE!!!​

​

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!​

​

It was a DEBATE!!!​

​

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!"​

My, what an inspiring genuine woman.

 

[ObamacareForever]

She accused him of being involved in racist policy that wanted to prevent her and minorities from busing opportunities as a child.

She also said she believed Biden's accusers of sex crimes.

That's some heavy artillery... and you know what she has to say about all that?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

My, what an inspiring genuine woman.

The involvement she accused him was living through it.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

The involvement she accused him was living through it.

Many people lived during those times. She wasn't painting them up and down with it.

So you're going to play the "she didn't mean what she obviously meant" card I see... interesting play.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Many people lived during those times. She wasn't painting them up and down with it.

So you're going to play the "she didn't mean what she obviously meant" card I see... interesting play.

No, she meant exactly what she said. "Biden worked with segregationists."
Notice how she didn't say:
"Biden worked on segregation"

Everyone over a certain age "worked with segregrationists". It Doesn't mean they were segregationists.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

No, she meant exactly what she said. "Biden worked with segregationists."
Notice how she didn't say:
"Biden worked on segregation"

Everyone over a certain age "worked with segregrationists". It Doesn't mean they were segregationists.

Okay then, I see your point. I mean hey, it's good to give politicians the benefit of the doubt, and really point out the intricacies of subjects, break them down, and alleviate wrongful and unfair distinctions.

LMAO

You absolutely always assume the most evil things on Donald Trump, provable or not, and then demand this careful, kid gloves treatment of Kamala Harris... My goodness. You can't be serious here.

This is a joke, right?

 

[Jack4freedom]

Okay then, I see your point. I mean hey, it's good to give politicians the benefit of the doubt, and really point out the intricacies of subjects, break them down, and alleviate wrongful and unfair distinctions.

LMAO

You absolutely always assume the most evil things on Donald Trump, provable or not, and then demand this careful, kid gloves treatment of Kamala Harris... My goodness. You can't be serious here.

This is a joke, right?

She will be an excellent running mate for Biden and may very well be the first woman to be elected President Of The United States. She is a very impressive, attractive, intelligent, accomplished and beautiful woman. I wish her all the best. Compared to the couple of scumbags she is running against she towers over them head head and shoulders. You better get used to her champ.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

She will be an excellent running mate for Biden and may very well be the first woman to be elected President Of The United States. She is a very impressive, attractive, intelligent, accomplished and beautiful woman. I wish her all the best. Compared to the couple of scumbags she is running against she towers over them head head and shoulders. You better get used to her champ.

You're free to be as much of a fan boy as you choose.

However, I'm curious as to which selection you have pegged Harris as.

Did she lie in the debates, or did she completely sacrifice her position?

Which one do you have her as? I think she was genuine in her insinuations that he was a racist and her claims that she believes the women who accuse Biden of sex crimes. However, she has an opportunity to become president through the back door, so she's changing her stances to achieve an end.

I'm curious what you think though...

 

[Jack4freedom]

You're free to be as much of a fan boy as you choose.

However, I'm curious as to which selection you have pegged Harris as.

Did she lie in the debates, or did she completely sacrifice her position?

Which one do you have her as? I think she was genuine in her insinuations that he was a racist and her claims that she believes the women who accuse Biden of sex crimes. However, she has an opportunity to become president through the back door, so she's changing her stances to achieve an end.

I'm curious what you think though...

I think she is an excellent politician who has changed her position regarding Joe Biden. She is also intelligent and highly competent. That sets her high above the lying cheating scoundrel and the Bible humping hypocrite on the other side of this election. It isn’t even a close call. You can nit pick all you want against Biden and Harris champ, but it won’t make any difference to anyone who isn’t a blind partisan or a crook himself.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

I think she is an excellent politician who has changed her position regarding Joe Biden. She is also intelligent and highly competent. That sets her high above the lying cheating scoundrel and the Bible humping hypocrite on the other side of this election. It isn’t even a close call. You can nit pick all you want against Biden and Harris champ, but it won’t make any difference to anyone who isn’t a blind partisan or a crook himself.

Wow, what a deflection and non answer...

no comment on her charges against Biden?

can I ask why you don’t care?

 

[Jack4freedom]

Wow, what a deflection and non answer...

no comment on her charges against Biden?

can I ask why you don’t care?

Because it really doesn’t matter champ. Perhaps Pence will step into the trap of trying your chickenshit little game on her in the debate and she will make his hypocritical little ass look like a monkey. Harris went after Biden for some of his past actions in a 16 person debate and caught him off guard. Happens all the time in political discourse. It’s not nearly as bad as Ted Cruz calling Trump a sniveling coward and a pathological liar who is totally amoral, then kissing Trump’s ass as soon as he got the nomination. Or how about Lindsay Graham calling Trump a racist scumbag and a nut, then as soon as Trump won the election, his head is so far up Trump’s ass he can’t see...

 

[EatTheRich]

No, she meant exactly what she said. "Biden worked with segregationists."
Notice how she didn't say:
"Biden worked on segregation"

Everyone over a certain age "worked with segregrationists". It Doesn't mean they were segregationists.

He worked with them specifically to defend school segregation.

 

[middleview]

Kamala Harris went on one of her devoted followers shows, Stephen Colbert. While Colbert will support her through and through, he did ask her a difficult and obvious question about the fact that she insinuated and basically called Biden a racist and guilty of sex crimes during the primary debates.

How did Harris react?

She began awkwardly and forcefully laughing and said "IT WAS A DEBATE" over and over.

We can take multiple things from this interaction:

1. Harris couldn't answer the question.
2. She has a more phony forced laugh than Hillary Clinton ever did.
3. Harris is now admittedly one of two things: Someone who will say things they don't believe on the debate stage, or someone who will change their position at the drop of hat depending on the circumstances.

Whichever one she is, she's already admitted to not being a genuine. Many politicians aren't genuine, but it's rare to see her openly embrace it so much.

No, she didn't accuse Biden of being a racist nor did she say he was guilty of sex crimes.

 

[middleview]

He worked with them specifically to defend school segregation.

No, he didn't. He opposed federally mandated busing programs. In the suburbs of Pittsburgh it would have meant taking a bus for 90 minutes, to another district...because that is how far it was from the mostly white suburbs to the areas close to the city. So the public shool I went to had about 300 kids (1st thru 6th grades) and entirely white. How would it improve a black school about 30 miles away to bus 100 of those kids to Mt. Washington and 100 of theirs to South Hills? Would the Mt. Washington school improve or would it remain underfunded? Would the 100 white kids now be subject to a poorer quality education while the 100 black kids get a better one?

It was a shitty program and the imbalance in the number of non-whites was not due to school policy, it was due to the price of homes in one area vs another.

In places where there had been school board policy to force segregation it was up to districts to rebalance districts. In the absence of local interest in doing so it was up to local citizens to sue the school board to force that to happen.

Remember Brown V. Board of Education?

in that case, one plaintiff, Linda Brown, a third-grader, had been forced to walk six blocks to catch the bus to take her to a black school even though a white school was seven blocks from her front door.