New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Join the club George...

IMHO, a vote for Hillary is a vote for another 4 years of Obama. (or worse.)

Do you have any idea which Republican will oppose her?

Not a clue at this point. I have my druthers - Kasich or Christy. But if I had a gun to my head and had to pick who it will be I'd say Rubio.
 
LOL.... some people never learn, eh? On the other hand, who in this maniacal field could a maniacal man like Soros support? ;)
I'm beginning to suspect much of the public comment coming from elites like Soros and Trump is deliberate disinformation. They both know there is a class war going on today just as it has for thousands of years, and they both know both major US political parties serve their interests. I guess the wild card would be a third-party candidate that could have the same effect in 2016 as Perot had in '92?
 
I'm beginning to suspect much of the public comment coming from elites like Soros and Trump is deliberate disinformation. They both know there is a class war going on today just as it has for thousands of years, and they both know both major US political parties serve their interests. I guess the wild card would be a third-party candidate that could have the same effect in 2016 as Perot had in '92?

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/10/19/jim_webb_considering_third_party_run.html
 
In grand scheme of things, this is hardly a game changer. (Jim) Webb is currently sitting at 1.2 percent in the RealClearPolitics running average of national polls, and he looked painfully out of place on the debate stage last week as Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin O’Malley touted their progressive bona fides.

" Webb wondering aloud about mounting an independent campaign, then, won’t create nearly as much handwringing at the Democratic Party’s HQ as Donald Trump’s third-party threat did this summer for the Republican Party."
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/10/19/jim_webb_considering_third_party_run.html

I guess he would bump up his speaker fees if he follows through. Maybe Trump has a cameo for him in his next Reality Show?
 
I'm beginning to suspect much of the public comment coming from elites like Soros and Trump is deliberate disinformation. They both know there is a class war going on today just as it has for thousands of years, and they both know both major US political parties serve their interests. I guess the wild card would be a third-party candidate that could have the same effect in 2016 as Perot had in '92?

That certainly sounds plausible. It's tough to think as deviously as these people at Soros' level, but your explanation is as good as anything else I've seen.
 
In grand scheme of things, this is hardly a game changer. (Jim) Webb is currently sitting at 1.2 percent in the RealClearPolitics running average of national polls, and he looked painfully out of place on the debate stage last week as Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin O’Malley touted their progressive bona fides.

" Webb wondering aloud about mounting an independent campaign, then, won’t create nearly as much handwringing at the Democratic Party’s HQ as Donald Trump’s third-party threat did this summer for the Republican Party."
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/10/19/jim_webb_considering_third_party_run.html

I guess he would bump up his speaker fees if he follows through. Maybe Trump has a cameo for him in his next Reality Show?

Hey, Trump/Webb as a third party ticket could do some damage though, eh?
 
Back
Top