New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Let Me Show You What Traitors They Are---

85



Hardly anybody, outside of a few insiders within Hillary's tight circle of traitors, understood the significance of the purple decorated pant suit that Hillary wore during her concession speech after the election, or the purple tie that Bill wore in support, while standing behind her. She sounded so genuine in her acceptance of Trump's victory, and everyone gave her credit for being so magnanimous in defeat.

But those paid Soros agents and provocateurs watching the charade on TV understood what it really meant. It was their signal to commence the Soros-inspired 'Purple Revolution' on the streets of America, designed to bring disruption, chaos, and confrontations with local authorities, so as to render Donald Trump's victory hollow and unworkable. I doubt that Donald Trump, or any member of his entourage, had any clue as to what was happening, but these 'color revolutions' that have taken place around the world are a hallmark of George Soros and his meddling in other nations' affairs. They are simply another method utilized by the Godless Zio-bankers of London to bring about regime change, with George Soros acting as the front-man, with money bags and millions of dollars to dispense.

Who remembers the 'Orange Revolution' that took place in Ukraine not too long ago? The fact that George Soros has not been arrested for subversive activities in this country is a bad sign; very bad. It exposes, for the world to see, the stranglehold that the Zion banksters have on America, and how deep the rot has spread. Soros is a wanted man in Russia. How times have changed and our situation reversed. Russia is now viewed as the 'good guy' on the world stage. Here's what the Globalist rag, The Huffington Post, had to say about Hillary's unusual pant suit:

"There’s no official word from Clinton’s camp on why she chose purple, though most observers guessed it was a call for national unity. Purple has also historically stood for nobility, with spiritual roots as a color of royalty and penitence. It’s also a power color chosen by the suffragist movement and represents LGBTQ rights."

Yeah, right.

Here are some examples of just how lost and unaware Americans are to what is going on inside their country, and why they have been so easy for the clever Jews to take:

Here's what a female Hillary fan posted to 'The Huffington Post' after Hillary's concession speech: "Everyone on stage with Hillary right now is wearing purple, the combination of red and blue. What a beautiful visual of togetherness."

Here's what another female fan gushed: "Hillary Clinton in a purple pantsuit...I see you. We aren't red or blue. We are one nation that needs to take action."

Oh, Lord, give me strength!!
 
But those paid Soros agents and provocateurs watching the charade on TV understood what it really meant. It was their signal to commence the Soros-inspired 'Purple Revolution' on the streets of America, designed to bring disruption, chaos, and confrontations with local authorities, so as to render Donald Trump's victory hollow and unworkable.
http://www.strategic-culture.org/ne...d-soros-launch-america-purple-revolution.html

"The Clintons, who both have received millions of dollars in campaign contributions and Clinton Foundation donations from Soros, were, in fact, helping to launch Soros’s «Purple Revolution» in America.

"The Purple Revolution will resist all efforts by the Trump administration to push back against the globalist policies of the Clintons and soon-to-be ex-President Barack Obama. The Purple Revolution will also seek to make the Trump administration a short one through Soros-style street protests and political disruption."
purplerevpackshot.jpg
 
The view from Russia:

Government figures in Russia, such as Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, have stated that color revolutions are a new form of warfare. In a speech to the Russian Parliament, President Putin said: "We see what tragic consequences the wave of so-called color revolutions led to. For us this is a lesson and a warning. We should do everything necessary so that nothing similar ever happens in Russia."

Imagine just how low the United States has sunk, when a large segment of its population invests so much energy, time, and tears trying to install two international criminals sponsored by the banker cabal (Bill and Hillary) at the levers of power, and are absolutely crushed when the attempt fails.
 
THE MARK OF SOROS---


Out of curiosity, what steps would you suggest that the people take to hold Soros accountable for sedition and treason against the U.S.?

BTW, Hillary the Hag looks plain evil and ugly in that picture. Danny Trejo would look at her and think that is long lost twin sister.
 
Serious questions: Knowing what we know about Hillary Clinton today, and the massive quantity of evidence that has been uncovered, implicating her in criminal activities, including the destruction of Libya (a non-threatening nation) while Secretary of State, influence peddling while holding office, and compromising confidential information via unprotected e-mails, as well as the money-laundering scam called the Clinton Foundation, and considering that her followers are well-acquainted with such evidence, but still vehemently support her regardless, would you call these 'bots' outright traitors, simply stupid, or incapable of telling right from wrong? If indeed traitors, or incapable of telling right from wrong, and if justice still prevails in America, should they continue to receive largess from the government (welfare, subsidized healthcare, etc. at our expense), and should they continue to be able to vote in national elections?

Lastly, should they be prosecuted for their traitorous activities (such as rioting in the streets and causing property damage, on signal from either Hillary or George Soros), to prevent the nation from totally imploding? Clearly, there can be no future for this country so long as these 'useful idiots' roam freely, inflicting damage to our liberties and paving the way for a Globalist/UN take-over of our government and institutions. Or should we just sit back and say to ourselves: 'Well, they are citizens just like us, and are entitled to decide which direction this country should be moving toward, and what kind of government we should have'? [And then spend the next couple of years 'Sleepless in Amerika']

IMO, these are legitimate questions that deserve serious thought and debate by intelligent Americans--before the opportunity to debate, and the freedom to act, are taken away from them.

"The illiterates of the 21st Century will not be the ones who cannot read and write; it will be those who cannot learn, unlearn, and re-learn."
---Alvin Toffler, author and futurist
 
Last edited:
85



Hardly anybody, outside of a few insiders within Hillary's tight circle of traitors, understood the significance of the purple decorated pant suit that Hillary wore during her concession speech after the election, or the purple tie that Bill wore in support, while standing behind her. She sounded so genuine in her acceptance of Trump's victory, and everyone gave her credit for being so magnanimous in defeat.

But those paid Soros agents and provocateurs watching the charade on TV understood what it really meant. It was their signal to commence the Soros-inspired 'Purple Revolution' on the streets of America, designed to bring disruption, chaos, and confrontations with local authorities, so as to render Donald Trump's victory hollow and unworkable. I doubt that Donald Trump, or any member of his entourage, had any clue as to what was happening, but these 'color revolutions' that have taken place around the world are a hallmark of George Soros and his meddling in other nations' affairs. They are simply another method utilized by the Godless Zio-bankers of London to bring about regime change, with George Soros acting as the front-man, with money bags and millions of dollars to dispense.

Who remembers the 'Orange Revolution' that took place in Ukraine not too long ago? The fact that George Soros has not been arrested for subversive activities in this country is a bad sign; very bad. It exposes, for the world to see, the stranglehold that the Zion banksters have on America, and how deep the rot has spread. Soros is a wanted man in Russia. How times have changed and our situation reversed. Russia is now viewed as the 'good guy' on the world stage. Here's what the Globalist rag, The Huffington Post, had to say about Hillary's unusual pant suit:

"There’s no official word from Clinton’s camp on why she chose purple, though most observers guessed it was a call for national unity. Purple has also historically stood for nobility, with spiritual roots as a color of royalty and penitence. It’s also a power color chosen by the suffragist movement and represents LGBTQ rights."

Yeah, right.

Here are some examples of just how lost and unaware Americans are to what is going on inside their country, and why they have been so easy for the clever Jews to take:

Here's what a female Hillary fan posted to 'The Huffington Post' after Hillary's concession speech: "Everyone on stage with Hillary right now is wearing purple, the combination of red and blue. What a beautiful visual of togetherness."

Here's what another female fan gushed: "Hillary Clinton in a purple pantsuit...I see you. We aren't red or blue. We are one nation that needs to take action."

Oh, Lord, give me strength!!

If they can't run the show, they will use violence to bring us down.

Is anyone surprised.

Leftists would be if they were thinking instead of looking for a job rioting.
 
I'm not so keen on praying for people's death, nor labeling people evil.
Actions are evil.
It's up to God to decide if people are evil or not.

But Leftists that shirk the responsible of calling any action "evil" based on biblical "judge not" words are condoning evil actions. It's why we have so much evil in the world now. Leftists refuse to call it what it is.
 
Actions are evil.
It's up to God to decide if people are evil or not.

But Leftists that shirk the responsible of calling any action "evil" based on biblical "judge not" words are condoning evil actions. It's why we have so much evil in the world now. Leftists refuse to call it what it is.

Yet...you labeled Soros and Clinton evil.

Call the actions what you will. I simply am not keen on love being displayed though praying for people's demise.
 
Yet...you labeled Soros and Clinton evil.

Call the actions what you will. I simply am not keen on love being displayed though praying for people's demise.
The amount of hate displayed on here, by people who say they don't hate, is astonishing. You would think that since Republicans won the election they would calm down but if anything it has ratcheted up beyond even what it was before the election. I don't get it, but it sure makes this place unpleasant to be around. I drop by, read about how "lefties" are "evil," which gets Winner ratings from the usual suspects, and then I leave again. What's left to discuss when one side has decided the other is "evil"? There's no point.
 
The amount of hate displayed on here, by people who say they don't hate, is astonishing. You would think that since Republicans won the election they would calm down but if anything it has ratcheted up beyond even what it was before the election. I don't get it, but it sure makes this place unpleasant to be around. I drop by, read about how "lefties" are "evil," which gets Winner ratings from the usual suspects, and then I leave again. What's left to discuss when one side has decided the other is "evil"? There's no point.

BobbyT exaggerating as usual---
 
Yet...you labeled Soros and Clinton evil.

Call the actions what you will. I simply am not keen on love being displayed though praying for people's demise.
I"m not doing this fighting stuff anymore, Craig. Find someone else.
 

The nation is discovering that it has cancer, Craig, and love alone is not going to cure it. Love is a wonderful thing, but one must also act. Love is a wonderful thing if the object of your love is receptive to it, and reciprocates. But what if those people around you do not reciprocate, and instead threaten your way of life, even the security of your family? How would you respond?

What would you do, Craig, if you suddenly discovered that you had cancer? How would you treat it? Would you retire to a quiet room and pray, love it (and yourself) to a complete remission, sit back and play tiddly-winks with your gonads--or what? What if this cancer was aggressive and is eating you alive? What would you do?
 
Last edited:
The nation is discovering that it has cancer, Craig, and love alone is not going to cure it. Love is a wonderful thing, but one must also act. Love is a wonderful thing if the object of your love is receptive to it, and reciprocates. But what if those people around you do not reciprocate, and instead threaten your way of life, even the security of your family? How would you respond?

What would you do, Craig, if you suddenly discovered that you had cancer? How would you treat it? Would you retire to a quiet room and pray, love it (and yourself) to a complete remission, sit back and play tiddly-winks with your gonads--or what? What if this cancer was aggressive and is eating you alive? What would you do?

I would die, just as my mother died of cancer. Just as my grandfather died of cancer. I have no belief I am immortal. Truthfully...of course...it depends on what cancer...and how advanced that cancer was.

That said, the people here whining about their terrible lives....all have wonderful lives. If they did not, they could not spend the time moaning about how terrible their lives are all day long...on an internet forum.
 
Back
Top