Lets give credit where credit is due.

[Gramps]

The GOP has always been a clan of loyalists who stick together so there is little use in trying to pry votes away from them. My late grandmother was an old line Republican, tighter than bark on a tree limb and always venting her disgust on leftwingers no matter whether their intentions were honorable than not.

When Kruschev was here visiting our farmland, a grand tour to bad mouth our success rate with capitalistic ventures he just happened to pay a visit near my grandmother's holdings and was upset with his constant boasts how the Soviet would eventually bury America. So, i posed this question to he, "If Christ was running on the Dem ticket and Kruschev on the Republican ticket for whom would you vote?" and she replied with little hesitation, "Well, for the Republican, of course". AND she meant exactly what she said.

In that respect things have not changed. But it's a positive they cling to come hell or high water. And loyalty, to me, is essential in all of our endeavors. That is the reason failure in the case of Mitt making the run is imminent. While he'll carry every vote from statitical areas that tend to lean right I doubt he can sell himself to the fence riders or unaffiliated voters to capture the big prise.

Gramps

 

[JackDallas]

The GOP has always been a clan of loyalists who stick together so there is little use in trying to pry votes away from them. My late grandmother was an old line Republican, tighter than bark on a tree limb and always venting her disgust on leftwingers no matter whether their intentions were honorable than not.

When Kruschev was here visiting our farmland, a grand tour to bad mouth our success rate with capitalistic ventures he just happened to pay a visit near my grandmother's holdings and was upset with his constant boasts how the Soviet would eventually bury America. So, i posed this question to he, "If Christ was running on the Dem ticket and Kruschev on the Republican ticket for whom would you vote?" and she replied with little hesitation, "Well, for the Republican, of course". AND she meant exactly what she said.

In that respect things have not changed. But it's a positive they cling to come hell or high water. And loyalty, to me, is essential in all of our endeavors. That is the reason failure in the case of Mitt making the run is imminent. While he'll carry every vote from statitical areas that tend to lean right I doubt he can sell himself to the fence riders or unaffiliated voters to capture the big prise.

Gramps

You must have inherited your grandfather's genes.

 

[Dawg]

yeah, all of 'O' hard work will gather the fence riders & unaffiliated.................wait, with ECONOMY in the toilet, not very likely, but, liberals will still vote 'O'. They just like your grandmother, evidently.

Maybe this will even CHANGE some liberals minds=>:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/860170/posts

not bloody likely, but, it will put them in boxes living in the streets.

 

[bdtex]

He's already carried the anti-Romney PJCon fence riders and "unaffiliated voters".

 

[Lukey]

Yeah? Well now the commie is running on the Democratic ticket and YOU are voting for him!

 

[oicu812]

He's already carried the anti-Romney PJCon fence riders and "unaffiliated voters".

psst..no, he has not.

 

[bdtex]

In his words,he only needs "50.1%" and he's certainly got it from the anti-Romney PJCons.

 

[zzigzzag]

I'll confess that if the alternative is Romney, I'd vote for Kruschev.....or a rutabaga.

I'd trust either infinitely more to be the same species after the election.

 

[Gramps]

That's two of us and if we each tell someone else, that'll be four of us, and if he four tell someone else, that'll make eight of us. How many times will it take to be a lot of voters? You fugure it and get a surprise.

Rutabaga For President


Gramps

I'll confess that if the alternative is Romney, I'd vote for Kruschev.....or a rutabaga.

I'd trust either infinitely more to be the same species after the election.