New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

MAGA

This meme makes me lol...
339897966_3231943587026133_8844857509926805283_n.jpg

Trump charged with 34 felony counts

Assistant Manhattan district attorney Chris Connolly told the court that Trump falsified business records in order to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election, disguised false payments in violation of election laws and worked with others to suppress damaging information. He said that a Trump lawyer, presumably Cohen, paid Daniels for the purpose of avoiding negative attention, and that Trump reimbursed Cohen in monthly payments afterward, disguising those payments and also disguising them in tax records. The intent to further another crime is a felony under New York law.
The Washington Post - Breaking news and latest headlines, U.S. news, world news, and video - The Washington Post
 
Last edited:
No cuffs
No perk walk
No cell

hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

34 felonies
don't try that at home
 
Actually, what we witnessed today was only a dress rehearsal. :)

No mugs shot
Yes, there's many more to come after today to be indicted
Since they're Eliets a special Mansion will probably be built
 
This meme makes me lol...
View attachment 74591

Trump charged with 34 felony counts

Assistant Manhattan district attorney Chris Connolly told the court that Trump falsified business records in order to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election, disguised false payments in violation of election laws and worked with others to suppress damaging information. He said that a Trump lawyer, presumably Cohen, paid Daniels for the purpose of avoiding negative attention, and that Trump reimbursed Cohen in monthly payments afterward, disguising those payments and also disguising them in tax records. The intent to further another crime is a felony under New York law.
The Washington Post - Breaking news and latest headlines, U.S. news, world news, and video - The Washington Post

How exactly is that different from Hillary paying for the Steele "dossier" and disguising it as "legal expenses?" You guys keep saying that this shows "no one is above the law/" but it sure looks like a case of "selective prosecution" to me.
 
No mugs shot
Yes, there's many more to come after today to be indicted
Since they're Eliets a special Mansion will probably be built

As I heard someone say they don't need a mug shot of Trump, everyone knows what he looks like. :)
I could have missed it, but I am wondering if they did a DNA on him.
It sounds like you have some others in mind, is that what you're implying?

230404_Thumbs_Up_t800.jpg
 
As I heard someone say they don't need a mug shot of Trump, everyone knows what he looks like. :)
I could have missed it, but I am wondering if they did a DNA on him.
It sounds like you have some others in mind, is that what you're implying?

View attachment 74593

Must be first human arrested with 34 felonies and NO mug shot, yeah but they don't have a mug shot in courts files
I missed all of it, had to take some stuff to field
Yes of course (who isn't under investigation)!
 
Fs5gedsWcAEjLEt.jpg
 
How exactly is that different from Hillary paying for the Steele "dossier" and disguising it as "legal expenses?" You guys keep saying that this shows "no one is above the law/" but it sure looks like a case of "selective prosecution" to me.

Did Hillary exempt the money as a business deduction?
If there's a lawyer on PJ maybe they can answer your question.
 
Did Hillary exempt the money as a business deduction?
If there's a lawyer on PJ maybe they can answer your question.

If a business man in charge of a $50 billion financial deal pays, say, Hunter Biden a half mil to not reveal details of their past past hooker and blow parties, is that a legitimate business expense?
 
I really don't understand your comments. Luke, sorry.

Will be back later, Trump is about to make a speech at Mar-A-Lago on CNN.
 
Must be first human arrested with 34 felonies and NO mug shot, yeah but they don't have a mug shot in courts files
I missed all of it, had to take some stuff to field
Yes of course (who isn't under investigation)!
Lots of Mug Shots online...Some are quite Funny
 
How exactly is that different from Hillary paying for the Steele "dossier" and disguising it as "legal expenses?" You guys keep saying that this shows "no one is above the law/" but it sure looks like a case of "selective prosecution" to me.
Hillary, Hillary, Cankles - oh my
 
If a business man in charge of a $50 billion financial deal pays, say, Hunter Biden a half mil to not reveal details of their past past hooker and blow parties, is that a legitimate business expense?
The subject of this thead is NOT Hillary, Obama or Hunter - do you understand yet?
 
Back
Top