Former acting CIA director Mike Morell took it upon himself to change what he was being told by people who were actually in the Benghazi firefight and reporting to him.
Was he covering up?
Was he protecting Hillary in case she wanted to run in 2016 (so she would see him as her savior and put him in some plum spot in her administration)?
Was he protecting Obama's votes in the election that was about to happen?
I hope those questions are answered, but Morell is stonewalling as much as he possibly can.......to his own detriment.
Morell seemed to make it a point NOT to know what was going on. He still makes that claim and says he didn't even know what Rice said on the air until well after she said it.
Another operative said
Even Morell's reports on what happened seemed to change with each subsequent question asked.
Sources:
Note that the major networks: CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC dealt with this topic minimally or not at all.
Washington Times
Fox News
C-Span
Was he covering up?
Was he protecting Hillary in case she wanted to run in 2016 (so she would see him as her savior and put him in some plum spot in her administration)?
Was he protecting Obama's votes in the election that was about to happen?
I hope those questions are answered, but Morell is stonewalling as much as he possibly can.......to his own detriment.
The CIA’s former deputy director disclosed Wednesday that Obama administration officials were alerted the day before they went on national television that a key tenet of their original Benghazi storyline might be inaccurate. But he did not explain why the administration continued to cling to its narrative even after U.S. intelligence debunked reports that the deadly attack was born out of a protest over an anti-Islam video.
Morell seemed to make it a point NOT to know what was going on. He still makes that claim and says he didn't even know what Rice said on the air until well after she said it.
One operator watching the hearing [said]: "He doesn't have any idea what happened that night. Why is he speculating? He wouldn't have to speculate if he talked to the people in Libya that night, or others who were watching."
Another operative said
Morell either still has no idea what happened that night, or he is covering for someone.
Even Morell's reports on what happened seemed to change with each subsequent question asked.
intelligence on the ground [knew] within the first 20 minutes was consistent that a terror attack was underway. Yet in Wednesday's testimony, Morell said analysts didn't know for sure and the only way he knew Al Qaeda was involved was through classified sources -- and that's why it was taken out of the talking points. But later in the testimony, Morell said he did not take out Al Qaeda from talking points, and that a group of "officers" from another CIA department did..........
Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., alleged during the hearing that Morell's testimony directly contradicted that of the chief of station, who testified on Tuesday behind closed doors due to his classified status. Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., alleged during the hearing that Morell's testimony directly contradicted that of the chief of station, who testified on Tuesday behind closed doors due to his classified status.
Sources:
Note that the major networks: CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC dealt with this topic minimally or not at all.
Washington Times
Fox News
C-Span