New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Only old people die of COVID?

Bugsy McGurk

President
I don't know of anyone who says only old people die of COVID. However, the data clearly shows that the risk of death by COVID grows exponentially with age.



In fact, deaths in the 65-74 age group dwarf all deaths of people ages 0-34 by 21.8 times.

Perspective. Do you have information on the parents' age, so that we can offer more targeted perspective?
 
Last edited:
I don't know of anyone who says only old people die of COVID. However, the data clearly shows that the risk of death by COVID grows exponentially with age.



Even in just the next highest age group, deaths are more than 10 times higher than the age group of the case you just cited.

In fact, deaths in the 65-74 age group dwarf all deaths of people ages 0-34 by 21.8 times.

Perspective.

Excellent. Perhaps we can end the drivel about “vulnerable people just protecting themselves.” Everyone is vulnerable. So just be honest and admit you are willing to trade lives for an absence of things like mandatory mask laws and restrictions on economic activity.

The “pro life” approach, no?
 
Excellent. Perhaps we can end the drivel about “vulnerable people just protecting themselves.” Everyone is vulnerable. So just be honest and admit you are willing to trade lives for an absence of things like mandatory mask laws and restrictions on economic activity.

The “pro life” approach, no?

Why yes, of course we trade lives for the freedom and convenience of others- every single day.

Oh and I have some good news! I read your article more thoroughly. The kid's parents were both in the 25-34 age group, which constitutes 0.71% of total COVID deaths.

Now, as to your "vulnerable people just protecting themselves". Who said that? And specifically, how does relate to or contribute to honest debate and discussion?

Oh and for bonus points.... tell me about these mandatory mask laws? And whose economic activity should we be limiting? And why?
 
Excellent. Perhaps we can end the drivel about “vulnerable people just protecting themselves.” Everyone is vulnerable. So just be honest and admit you are willing to trade lives for an absence of things like mandatory mask laws and restrictions on economic activity.

The “pro life” approach, no?
That’s NOT how public health policy is made. The statistical remarkably low risk to people under 50 is staggering. That this statistic is not “zero” is a pathetically dishonest and flatly non-compelling argument to make for shutdowns - or any larger policy. I could point you to the fact that this holds for all disease and associated policy, but what point would that serve?

Pathetic.
 
Why yes, of course we trade lives for the freedom and convenience of others- every single day.

Oh and I have some good news! I read your article more thoroughly. The kid's parents were both in the 25-34 age group, which constitutes 0.71% of total COVID deaths.

Now, as to your "vulnerable people just protecting themselves". Who said that? And specifically, how does relate to or contribute to honest debate and discussion?

Oh and for bonus points.... tell me about these mandatory mask laws? And whose economic activity should we be limiting? And why?

Enjoy your rabbit holes. I won’t be joining you.

I just wanted to dispel that notion that “vulnerable people can just protect themselves.” Everyone is vulnerable. I graciously accept your concession on the point.
 
That’s NOT how public health policy is made. The statistical remarkably low risk to people under 50 is staggering. That this statistic is not “zero” is a pathetically dishonest and flatly non-compelling argument to make for shutdowns - or any larger policy. I could point you to the fact that this holds for all disease and associated policy, but what point would that serve?

Pathetic.

Maybe we can get someone to read your tirade to the five year old boy who lost both parents to COVID. That should make him feel better, no?
 
Enjoy your rabbit holes. I won’t be joining you.

I just wanted to dispel that notion that “vulnerable people can just protect themselves.” Everyone is vulnerable. I graciously accept your concession on the point.

Yes, anecdotes can be very fun. That is the only thing I concede.
 
Maybe we can get someone to read your tirade to the five year old boy who lost both parents to COVID. That should make him feel better, no?
Yes - and maybe we can shut down everything everywhere every time based on non-zero risk factors...right, honest, science-following poster?

Good grief. What a hack.
 
You infer it with each [underachieing...yet subsidized] post. Awful stuff.

Have a swell day.

Oh, you claim I “infer” something I did not say.

Perhaps you should ask people what they think instead of just concocting things. Try to be honest. Just try.
 
Enjoy your rabbit holes. I won’t be joining you.

I just wanted to dispel that notion that “vulnerable people can just protect themselves.” Everyone is vulnerable. I graciously accept your concession on the point.
FFS Bugs, man up and answer the questions.
 
Back
Top